Beyond Watson: NYU-poly researchers create smarter circuits

Mar 03, 2011
NYU-poly researchers create smarter circuits

(PhysOrg.com) -- Watson’s recent supercomputer victory over Jeopardy’s best players has some wondering if computers are getting smarter than, or at least as smart, as humans.

Garrett S. Rose, a Polytechnic Institute of NYU assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering, describes Watson as something similar to a giant search engine with the ability to mimic some behavior of the human mind. Because it depends on conventional computing hardware, he says, its ability to adapt and learn – an ability that would make computer smarts more like human smarts — is limited.

Dr. Rose is a member of an NYU-Poly research team that has created a technique for controlling circuits that process information similar to the way neural networks do.

“Circuits in PCs have been designed to output exact results — and for good reason,” he says. “They need to know that one plus one is two. Circuits used for artificial intelligence are different. They need to be able to fill in the gaps. They need to have plasticity like the brain does.”

The research team’s technique, which won the 24th IEEE International Symposium on VLSI Design Best Student Paper Award in January, helps circuits perform more reliably so they can fill in those gaps and carry out human-like functions — recognizing voices and images, for example.

A key part of the technique is an algorithm that helps control the variations in memristors, nano-scale devices used in for artificially intelligent hardware. Jeyavijayan Rajendran, a computer and electrical engineering PhD candidate, devised the algorithm, which the team presented in the award-winning paper, “An Approach to Tolerate Process Related Variations in Memristor-Based Applications.” Ramesh Karri, professor of electrical and computer engineering, and Harika Manem, also a computer and electrical engineering PhD candidate, co-authored the paper with Dr. Rose and Mr. Rajendran.

The team has been working with the Air Force Research Laboratory to develop its research and potential applications.

Explore further: Communication-optimal algorithms for contracting distributed tensors

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Memristor chip could lead to faster, cheaper computers

Mar 17, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The memristor is a computer component that offers both memory and logic functions in one simple package. It has the potential to transform the semiconductor industry, enabling smaller, faster, cheaper chips ...

Cat brain: A step toward the electronic equivalent

Apr 14, 2010

A cat can recognize a face faster and more efficiently than a supercomputer. That's one reason a feline brain is the model for a biologically-inspired computer project involving the University of Michigan.

Circuit board materials may like it hot (or not)

Jun 09, 2006

Electrical circuits may act differently in Arizona than they do in Alaska--potentially affecting the performance of computers and other electronics. A new technique identifies and quantifies an important cause of this temperature ...

Recommended for you

Designing exascale computers

Jul 23, 2014

"Imagine a heart surgeon operating to repair a blocked coronary artery. Someday soon, the surgeon might run a detailed computer simulation of blood flowing through the patient's arteries, showing how millions ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

baudrunner
2 / 5 (1) Mar 03, 2011
I guess we're still looking for a description of intelligence. To say that a computer is smarter than a human is like saying that Wikipedia is smarter than my Funk and Wagnall's. Actually, the human will always be smarter than a computer because the human can solve problems creatively, arbitrarily selecting one of the many ways to solve a single geometry problem for example, whereas the computer's method must be pre-programmed. What makes a human unique is the freedom to apply a policy of unpredictability, as a matter of choice. So, in the long run, a computer will lose out to the human challenger, if the questions it is asked can be tailored to obfuscate the result by first knowing how the computer will address the problem.