For scientists, next challenge is to predict how tsunamis will behave

Mar 12, 2011 By Lisa M. Krieger

About 5,000 miles across the Pacific Ocean, the earth erupted more than 15 miles under the sea floor - the fifth most powerful quake ever recorded - unleashing a mammoth train of waves toward North America.

It was 9:46 p.m. PST Thursday in California, and tsunami experts knew exactly when Japan's wall of water, traveling the speed of a jet airliner, would hit the U.S. West Coast. The question was, what would it do when it got here? A new system of sensors and buoys, floating in the Pacific, successfully alerted scientists to the magnitude 8.9 earthquake's punch and then tracked the tsunami's route across the ocean.

But for scientists, the next challenge will be predicting how tsunamis will behave, once they arrive. Tsunamis are a series of "wave trains" of varying sizes and strengths.

They are highly influenced by each region's hidden underwater landscape, which can create powerful currents that pull, push and swirl.

"The forecast was very accurate in terms of the time it takes to reach our coast, but not in terms of amplitude," said U.S. Geological Survey oceanographer Guy Gelfenbaum. "There are a lot of factors that will determine how big the waves will be. Things like harbor orientation, rocky reefs ... these are features we are just starting to understand."

So, scientists knew the first surge would arrive on the California coast about 8 a.m. - right on schedule. In Santa Cruz, boats were ripped from moorings, while the waves along the San Mateo coast just strengthened their slap on the beach. In Crescent City, near Oregon, the harbor suddenly drained of water, then at least three dozen boats were crushed. A man taking photos on a beach at the mouth of the Klamath River was sucked out to sea - in what may be only the second time a tsunami caused a death in the continental United States. Boats in San Luis Obispo's Avila Beach tipped and tossed like bathtub toys.

Because it was low tide, greater damage was averted. Scientists know, in general, that the depth, orientation and configuration of a coastline influences a tsunami's impact - explaining why Crescent City and Santa Cruz harbors were hardest hit.

In the shallow bay of Crescent City, an offshore "fracture zone" acts as a "wave guide," directing waves into the harbor, said U.S. Geological Survey scientist Eric Geist. "Wave after wave piles up."

In Santa Cruz, "when the tsunami came into the harbor, the water got focused, because the entrance is narrow. So the water sped up and moved the boats and docks around, damaging them. The mooring lines weren't set up to hold them," Gelfenbaum said.

That's why scientists seek to conduct the detailed research needed to produce local measurements that would more precisely predict tsunami behavior.

Before Friday, the only place in the continental United States where people were known to have died in a tsunami was Crescent City. In 1964, a tsunami triggered by an earthquake off Anchorage, Alaska, killed 12 people in the Northern California fishing port. Tsunamis are caused by earthquakes generated in a "subduction zone," where an oceanic plate is being forced down into the earth's mantle by plate tectonic forces. The friction creates stress, and then the overriding plate ruptures, and snaps - displacing a giant column of water.

"There's a diving motion of the ocean floor under the North Japanese island," said USGS scientist Steve Kirby. It was an Indonesian subduction zone where an in December 2004 created a that killed a quarter of a million people. In contrast, some of California's faults - San Andreas, Calavaras and Hayward - are "strike slip" faults, where vertical plates slide past each other. While equally destructive, they do not lurch horizontally and so do not trigger vast volumes of water.

Much has changed since 2004, when scientists stood by helplessly because their mathematical models didn't produce a warning fast enough to prevent the massive tragedy in Indonesia.

Now, a system of underwater sensors, which detect changes in water pressure, transmit that information to - then to teams of scientists, with banks of computers.

Yet even the well-prepared Japan, close to the epicenter, did not have enough time to avert wreckage and death. "This wave is not like a storm wave, or a wind wave, which crashes over and is gone after 5 to 10 seconds," Gelfenbaum said. "This wave has many, many minutes' worth of water behind it. So you get 4 feet of water, but it comes for 10, 15 minutes. It keeps inundating. It is a large volume of water. It doesn't crash and go away."

Explore further: NASA's HS3 looks Hurricane Edouard in the eye

3.3 /5 (6 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

East Coast tsunamis maps to be created

Nov 23, 2005

Two University of Rhode Island scientists have been awarded an $86,000 grant to create tsunami warning maps of the East Coast of the United States.

Conditions combined for devastating tsunami

Sep 30, 2009

(AP) -- Because of a lethal combination of geology and geography, the people of American Samoa didn't stand much of a chance. Almost every condition that triggers bad tsunamis was in place this time, generating ...

Pacific tsunami threat greater than expected

Jul 20, 2009

The potential for a huge Pacific Ocean tsunami on the West Coast of America may be greater than previously thought, according to a new study of geological evidence along the Gulf of Alaska coast.

Cause of tsunami wave heights is studied

Aug 20, 2007

Irish-led scientists have found tsunami wave height is independent of earthquake magnitude and is instead linked to a rupture's vertical displacement.

Recommended for you

Sculpting tropical peaks

16 hours ago

Tropical mountain ranges erode quickly, as heavy year-round rains feed raging rivers and trigger huge, fast-moving landslides. Rapid erosion produces rugged terrain, with steep rivers running through deep ...

Volcano expert comments on Japan eruption

17 hours ago

Loÿc Vanderkluysen, PhD, who recently joined Drexel as an assistant professor in Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science in the College of Arts and Sciences, returned Friday from fieldwork ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
1 / 5 (3) Mar 13, 2011
Hopefully scientists are also questioning the source of hydrogen in damaged nuclear reactors:

"Inside the troubled nuclear power plant, officials knew the risks were high when they decided to vent radioactive steam from a severely overheated reactor vessel. They knew a hydrogen explosion could occur, and it did. The decision still trumped the worst-case alternative total nuclear meltdown." AP News report

After a neutron is expelled from the center of the Sun or a heavy nucleus, like U or Pu, the neutron decays to hydrogen in ~10 minutes.

Neutron => H+ + e-

That is the source of hydrogen pouring from the top of the Sun's atmosphere [1]. Could that also be the source of hydrogen released from the Japanese reactor?

[1] "Neutron Repulsion" [The APEIRON Journal, in press (2011), 19 pages]

http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1

Oliver K. Manuel
vidyunmaya
1 / 5 (2) Mar 14, 2011
Sub: Science to Progress-Need Comprehension
Many people are ignoring the origins that drive the SUN.Down the line- Solar events- Heavy duty earth bound - Lightning [TGF]-Corona mass ejections can find their way on Low-resistant paths. LHC experiments and Earth quakes cannot be viewed in isolation.Earth is a Floating Ball- Cosmology Vedas interlinks Knowledge base to wake-up in time
www.newciv.org/nl...hp/_v162
Vidyardhi Nanduri
barakn
5 / 5 (1) Mar 14, 2011
Neutron => H+ + e-
... Could that also be the source of hydrogen released from the Japanese reactor? -omatumr

No. It's not. They're using seawater mixed with boric acid in a desperate bid to cool the rods. Boron, as we all remember, is a neutron absorber with a very large cross section for fast neutrons. There should be very few free neutrons because of this. Also consider the enormous amount of hydrogen being produced. If neutrons were the source, the large numbers could only come from a runaway fission reaction so intense that the core and its containment vessel would already be a puddle of goo.

What's really going on is that the seawater is chemically reacting with the fuel rods under high temperature and pressure. The oxygen from the water is oxidizing the fuel rods and their casings, releasing hydrogen in the process.

I'm disgusted by your attempt to use this horrific tragedy to promote your pseudo-scientific dribble, and I'm reporting you to the admins.