Quizzes key to learning for middle school students

Mar 07, 2011 By Tony Fitzpatrick

(PhysOrg.com) -- Practice might not always make perfect, but a novel study of Midwestern middle school science students suggests it just might.

A new study by researchers at Washington University in St. Louis shows that who received three quizzes on content questions before a unit test performed at the “A” level on those test questions, compared to a “C” level on questions that were not quizzed but still on the test.

WUSTL psychologists quizzed 8th grade science students over a broad range of science content across three different semesters, thereby allowing generalization to the results and the opportunity to “tease apart” the effectiveness of the three quizzes.

A first quiz (pre-lecture) was given before the teacher’s lecture, say, on an anatomy unit; a second (post-lecture) was given after the lecture, and a third (review) spaced several days later and immediately before the unit exam.

The study was a follow-up of their previous study on social studies students, and had never been done in middle school science classes before.

“Both in social studies middle school classes and junior high science classes we have shown that quizzing dramatically improves students’ performances on exam items related to the quizzes,” says Mark McDaniel, PhD, professor of psychology in Arts & Sciences.

“It’s important to note that if only the non-quizzed questions had been graded on the exam, the average grade would have been a 78, or C-plus. If only the quizzed items, the average score would have been 93.

“It’s many people’s observations that in middle school, we often see an achievement decline in science and waning student interest,” McDaniel says. “If you can do something as easy as quizzing to help increase students’ performance, maybe that will help boost their self-efficacy, and we’ll start seeing improvement.”

Results were published in the recent issue of the Journal of Educational Psychology.

Using questions included on the teacher’s past tests and which were going to be on subsequent unit and semester exams, the researchers used an educational software program aligned with a white “smart board” that records data and recognizes which student is making responses with hand-held clickers coded for each individual student.

The program even records aggregate data to see the spread of responses to the strictly multiple-choice questions.

The quizzes were deliberately “low stake,” accounting for a very small percentage of overall grade, and the students found the exercise “fun and something to look forward to,” McDaniel says. “They’d be disappointed to not see our research assistants conducting the quizzes. The teacher was out of the room, so she had no idea which questions were quizzed and which not. The kids loved the clickers.”

While a quiz is relatively easy, three quizzes may seem time-consuming, especially for teachers with five sections and 100-plus students to evaluate. Plus, some teachers are skeptical of the usefulness of quizzes. McDaniel and his colleagues sought to find the quiz most effective in boosting scores, and that was the review quiz.

“It became important to ask: Do you need all three, just two, or just one? You can get big benefits from just the strategically placed review quiz, and not just for that exam but for the semester exam down the road as well,” McDaniel says.

“The post-lecture was more effective than the pre-lecture quiz. The pre- and post- lecture quizzes aren’t very well spaced, but the review quiz is spaced out by several days. The result agrees with basic memory literature that spacing exposure to material produces better memory retrieval and retention,” McDaniel says.

The researchers evaluated the effectiveness of the different quizzes by reducing the number of questions in two semesters’ rounds of quizzing. In a unit on genetics, for example, in the first semester of study, six questions would be on each of the quizzes for each unit test throughout the semester.

In a second semester on a different unit, for example, in evolution, they would get subsets of the six questions in “watered down” quizzes; that is, questions one and two might be on the pre- quiz, three and four on the post-quiz, five and six on the review quiz.

This way students were still exposed to all of the quizzed material at different times in the quizzing process. In yet a third semester, a completely different group of students was quizzed in the same way but did not have a long-term cumulative (final) exam.

“Students got all the items, select subsets of the questions, but at different times,” McDaniel says. “This tested the value of each particular quiz on its own.”

McDaniel says that critics of his study might claim that the approach simply encourages rote learning. While he disagrees, calling the quizzing method “a learning device meant to build a core of knowledge at a student’s fingertips, from which problem solving and creativity might spring,” he acknowledges that some could interpret the quiz method as exercises in rote.

To address that concern, he and his colleagues tested subsequent groups of middle school science students and changed the overlap between quiz questions and exam questions.

For instance, for competition, a big concept in evolution, McDaniel and his collaborators designed a definition of the concept in quizzes but then asked an applications question in the unit test.

The sample exam question might be:

Squirrels and raccoons on Long Island going after the same nut supply is an example of:

(A) natural selection
(B) co-evolution
(C) competition
(D) none

Conversely, some quizzes asked the application question and the exam the definition one. The results of this work, currently under review, show that students are successfully making the leap between definition and applications, linking the two, and in effect are learning from the quizzing.

“We’ve been able to show that quizzing improves the learning of science concepts because the quizzes are improving performance on exam items that the students have never seen before,” McDaniel says.

Explore further: Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed

Related Stories

Useless online student quizzes

Jan 20, 2010

Online quizzes are not helping students learn their subject, according to a study just published in the International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education.

Binge drinking doesn't affect next-day student test-taking

Mar 23, 2010

In a first-of-its kind controlled experiment, researchers from the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) and Brown University have found that surprisingly, binge drinking the night before a test does not impact ...

Facebook knows too much, ACLU says in warning of quizzes

Aug 27, 2009

Privacy advocates have long warned that users of Facebook and other social networks who seek amusement from quizzes like "What Simpsons Character Are You?" might be mortified by the way creators of such applications can access ...

Recommended for you

Poll: Big Bang a big question for most Americans

2 hours ago

Few Americans question that smoking causes cancer. But they have more skepticism than confidence in global warming, the age of the Earth and evolution and have the most trouble believing a Big Bang created the universe 13.8 ...

Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed

Apr 18, 2014

Almost seven years have passed since Ontario's street-racing legislation hit the books and, according to one Western researcher, it has succeeded in putting the brakes on the number of convictions and, more importantly, injuries ...

Newlyweds, be careful what you wish for

Apr 17, 2014

A statistical analysis of the gift "fulfillments" at several hundred online wedding gift registries suggests that wedding guests are caught between a rock and a hard place when it comes to buying an appropriate gift for the ...

Can new understanding avert tragedy?

Apr 17, 2014

As a boy growing up in Syracuse, NY, Sol Hsiang ran an experiment for a school project testing whether plants grow better sprinkled with water vs orange juice. Today, 20 years later, he applies complex statistical ...

Creative activities outside work can improve job performance

Apr 16, 2014

Employees who pursue creative activities outside of work may find that these activities boost their performance on the job, according to a new study by San Francisco State University organizational psychologist Kevin Eschleman ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Occupodies
5 / 5 (2) Mar 07, 2011
duh...
TNick
not rated yet Mar 07, 2011
duh...

:)

More news stories

Poll: Big Bang a big question for most Americans

Few Americans question that smoking causes cancer. But they have more skepticism than confidence in global warming, the age of the Earth and evolution and have the most trouble believing a Big Bang created the universe 13.8 ...

Egypt archaeologists find ancient writer's tomb

Egypt's minister of antiquities says a team of Spanish archaeologists has discovered two tombs in the southern part of the country, one of them belonging to a writer and containing a trove of artifacts including reed pens ...

Finnish inventor rethinks design of the axe

(Phys.org) —Finnish inventor Heikki Kärnä is the man behind the Vipukirves Leveraxe, which is a precision tool for splitting firewood. He designed the tool to make the job easier and more efficient, with ...

Making graphene in your kitchen

Graphene has been touted as a wonder material—the world's thinnest substance, but super-strong. Now scientists say it is so easy to make you could produce some in your kitchen.