Quantum explanation for how we smell gets new support

Mar 28, 2011 by Lisa Zyga report
Scientists are trying to find out if, in addition to a molecule's shape, its vibrational energy also plays a role in how we distinguish smells. Image is part of an 1895 painting by John William Waterhouse.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Since 1996, when biophysicist Luca Turin first suggested that quantum mechanics may help explain how we smell various odors, the idea has met with controversy. In the past 15 years, some studies have found evidence supporting the theory, while other studies have found problems with it. Now Turin - who is currently at MIT and the Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Centre in Vari, Greece - along with his colleagues, has published a study that provides further evidence for the vibration theory of smell, and may make the theory a bit less controversial.

In the traditional “lock and key” model of , odorant of different shapes and sizes fit into different receptors, similar to the current understanding of how drugs affect the body. When a molecule enters a receptor, the receptor sends a signal to the brain, and we smell that molecule.

However, there is one problem with this model, which is that some molecules with nearly identical shapes smell very different. This evidence suggests that some other criteria in addition to size and shape must cause receptors to react differently and to send different signals to the brain.

According to Turin’s theory, the additional criteria are the vibrational frequencies of odorant molecules. A molecule’s vibrational frequency can cause electrons in the nasal receptors to tunnel between two energy states if the vibrational frequency matches the energy difference of the two states. Tunneling is a quantum mechanical phenomenon, since the electrons do not have enough energy to move between the two states by classical means. When receptors detect these vibrational frequencies, they send signals to the brain based on the molecules’ vibrations in addition to their shapes.

The theory is controversial: the prestigious science journal Nature rejected Turin’s original paper, and some studies have found evidence that conflicts with the theory. But other studies have found the theory to be mathematically and physically sound. For instance, in 2007, Jennifer Brookes, et al., found that Turin’s vibration theory of smell is consistent with the laws of physics, and also that there appears to be a connection between a molecule’s vibration spectrum and its odor.

In Turin and his coauthors’ latest study, the scientists found that flies can distinguish between an odorant molecule containing hydrogen and the same molecule when the hydrogen is replaced with the isotope deuterium. While hydrogen and deuterium have the same shape, deuterium has a lower vibrational frequency. The scientists also trained the flies to avoid either of the two molecules. They found that flies trained to avoid an odorant molecule containing deuterium also avoided an unrelated molecule with a similar vibrational mode. Because the flies reacted similarly to molecules with similar vibrational energies but different shapes, the results support the theory that molecular vibration plays an important role in how flies distinguish smells.

Overall, the researchers still have a lot of details to work out in the theory. However, the idea is slowly becoming more acceptable, as demonstrated by presentations given at a recent meeting of the American Physical Society in Dallas, Texas. If scientists can better understand the details about how we smell, they could potentially design an electronic nose that is superior to today’s chemical sensors.

Explore further: Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states

More information: via: BBC

Related Stories

Fruit flies can detect heavy hydrogen: study

Feb 16, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new study by researchers in Greece and the US has found that fruit flies can discriminate between normal and heavy hydrogen (deuterium) isotopes, which adds weight to a new theory of how ...

Humans, flies smell alike, neurobiologists find

Mar 26, 2007

The nose knows – whether it’s on a fruit fly or a human. And while it would seem that how a fruit fly judges odors should differ from how a human smells, new research from Rockefeller University finds that at the neurobiological ...

Solving single molecule mobility

Oct 18, 2010

Nanotechnologists assemble intricate nanodevices, such as computer chips, molecule by molecule using ‘bottom-up’ techniques that mirror nature. One approach shuttles molecules along surfaces into ...

Recommended for you

Study finds physical link to strange electronic behavior

56 minutes ago

Scientists have new clues this week about one of the baffling electronic properties of the iron-based high-temperature superconductor barium iron nickel arsenide. A Rice University-led team of U.S., German ...

Refocusing research into high-temperature superconductors

13 hours ago

Below a specific transition temperature superconductors transmit electrical current nearly loss-free. For the best of the so-called high-temperature superconductors, this temperature lies around -180 °C – a temperature ...

MRI for a quantum simulation

18 hours ago

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is the medical application of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, is a powerful diagnostic tool. MRI works by resonantly exciting hydrogen atoms and measuring ...

50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet installed at Fermilab

18 hours ago

One year ago, the 50-foot-wide Muon g-2 electromagnet arrived at the U.S. Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois after traveling 3,200 miles over land and sea from Long Island, ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

hush1
5 / 5 (3) Mar 28, 2011
For me, Fourier transformations (energy distributions) makes sense to enable the brain to interpret and store what perception delivers. Kudos to Luca Turin and colleagues.
Going
5 / 5 (1) Mar 28, 2011
Turin's book 'The Emperor of Scent' , as well as being a good read is a study of the way a scientific establishment will put barriers in the way of a new explanatory idea rather than explore it in a detached way. Social standing seems to trump the search for truth , at least in the short term.