Political narratives on race, Southern identity influence national elections

Mar 07, 2011

New research from North Carolina State University shows how attempts to define the South by Republicans and Democrats may have set the stage for President Obama's victories in Southern states – and shaped the way Americans view themselves.

"Every presidential election is a chance to discuss what it means to be American," says Dr. Christina Moss, teaching assistant professor of communication at NC State and author of a paper on the research. "The South garnered a great deal of attention in the 2004 election season, and the narratives from that election may provide clues to Obama's success in 2008."

In 2004, then-Senator Zell Miller, a Democrat, gave a speech at the Republican National Convention that garnered widespread attention for its angry tone and its refutation of the Democratic Party as representing Southern interests. Following Miller's speech, Republicans and spun competing political narratives about the American South.

"The portrayed Southerners as rural, loyal to their party, God-fearing, pragmatic and family-oriented people who had learned their lesson about racial prejudice," Moss says. "Democrats highlighted the South's history of racial strife, intolerance and resistance to change. However, both narratives painted a picture of a predominantly white Southern electorate, giving little voice to the African-American population.

"One factor in Obama's later success in the South may have been his ability, as an African-American, to cut through those competing narratives and allow African-American Southerners to regain a political identity."

The two narratives in 2004 effectively reinforced the idea that political power rested primarily in the hands of white voters. "The narratives effectively marginalized African-Americans," Moss says, "by defining the South's regional identity in terms of how whites have handled political power."

This is important nationally, Moss explains, because Southern regional identity informs our national identity. "How we think about the South affects the way that we think about what it means to be American," Moss says. "In Obama's next presidential campaign, it will be interesting to see how these political narratives have changed, in terms of how the parties address race and regionalism."

Explore further: Crude conspiracy theories could be right, study shows

More information: The paper, "A Nation Divided: Regional Identity, National Narratives and Senator Zell Miller in the 2004 Presidential Election," is forthcoming from the Southern Communication Journal.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Voter behavior can explain midterm mood shift

Oct 29, 2010

Based on news accounts predicting Republican gains in both houses of Congress and more energized GOP voters in Tuesday's midterm election, it appears as though the nation's political landscape could change again -- just two ...

Which politicians do voters blame for the down economy?

Aug 17, 2010

A down economy usually spells trouble for incumbents, but a new Brigham Young University study shows that six Republicans up for re-election this year caught a break when John McCain lost the last presidential election.

Why New Political Parties Sizzle or Fizzle

Aug 04, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Across the globe, new political parties, from green parties to anti-immigration parties, are constantly emerging in democratic countries. But while some of these nascent single-issue groups fade away, others, ...

Recommended for you

Retreat of multiculturalism 'is a myth'

11 hours ago

Perceptions of a decline in multiculturalism as a means of integrating ethnic minorities are unfounded, research led at the University of Strathclyde has found.

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.