Physicists observe antihelium-4 nucleus, the heaviest antinucleus yet
March 22, 2011 by Lisa Zyga 
This 3D illustration of the STAR Time Projection Chamber shows the track of an antihelium-4 nucleus (red). Image credit: STAR Collaboration, RHIC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
(PhysOrg.com) -- In 1932, scientists observed the first antimatter particle, a positron (or antielectron). Since then, scientists have observed heavier and heavier states of antimatter: antiprotons and antineutrons in 1955, followed by antideuterons, antitritons, and antihelium-3 during the next two decades. Advances in accelerator and detector technology led to the first production of antihydrogen in 1995 and antihypertriton (strange antimatter) in 2010. Now, scientists with the STAR collaboration at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory have observed another state of antimatter for the first time: the antimatter helium-4 nucleus, which is the heaviest antinucleus observed so far.
As the researchers report in a study posted at arXiv.org, the antihelium-4 nucleus consists of four antiparticles: two antiprotons and two antineutrons. To observe the new antimatter, the scientists collided gold nuclei with each other a billion times. These high-energy collisions produced a quark gluon plasma, which is a hot, dense matter that contains roughly equal numbers of quarks and antiquarks. As the plasma cooled, it transitioned into a hadron gas and produced protons, neutrons, and their antiparticles. The scientists observed a total of 18 antimatter helium-4 nuclei in this gas, demonstrating that antihelium-4 does indeed exist.
As the scientists noted, antihelium-4 will likely be the heaviest antinuclei to be observed for quite a while. The scientists predict that the production of the next heaviest stable antimatter nucleus, antilithium-6, is beyond the reach of current accelerator technology.
The amount of antihelium-4 that the scientists observed in the current experiment can be modeled very closely by thermodynamics, which suggests that there’s not a lot of naturally occurring antihelium-4 in the Universe. In fact, the scientists predict that we’re very unlikely to see any of it in space; if we did observe antihelium-4 in space (or any antinuclei heavier than antihelium-4), it would mean that the antimatter is being produced by another mechanism. And if there were another mechanism for producing antimatter in large enough quantities that we could observe it, that would indicate the existence of a large amount of antimatter somewhere in the Universe.
The Space Shuttle Endeavour, which is currently scheduled to launch in April, is carrying the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer to the International Space Station to search for particles of antimatter in cosmic rays. The scientists predict that the spectrometer will not detect any antihelium, but if it does, it could have significant implications for antimatter research. One of the biggest questions that cosmologists have is why the observable Universe is made almost entirely of matter and not antimatter. Finding a part of the Universe that contains more antimatter than expected could help scientists find an answer and shed light on what was happening during the early Universe.
More information: STAR Collaboration. "Observation of the antimatter helium-4 nucleus." arXiv:1103.3312v1 [nucl-ex]
via: The Physics ArXiv Blog and Press Release
© 2010 PhysOrg.com
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Question about induced E field.
37 minutes ago
-
Charging a capacitor in a tesla coil
38 minutes ago
-
Water Rocket
4 hours ago
-
why do trucks have bigger brakes?
8 hours ago
-
Solar Sail Physics - Do they work on a large scale?
9 hours ago
-
How should I switch an air conditioner off?
9 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (20) |
46
|
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
May 24, 2012 |
4.7 / 5 (15) |
36
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?
The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.
May 21, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (3) |
8
Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector
A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...
May 21, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (16) |
7
|
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Mar 22, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
Mar 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
Mar 23, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
That is a very valid question .. Using a magnetic bottle with anti-hydrogen ions , i don't see any problem getting spectrometric readings off it even if it is a very minute quantity.
It looks like they are doing precisely this @ http://www.mpq.mp...dex.html
They claim be making something called a "superconducting radiofrequency Paul trap" to do this.
Mar 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Theoretically, there is no difference between the interaction of matter and light vs antimatter and light. Your spectrometer readings should be the same.
However, a spectrometer ionizes the molecules when taking a reading. The charge on an antimatter ion is opposite that of a matter ion. You could differentiate the two based on that if you could compare a matter sample with an antimatter sample.
Mar 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet