Panel told no guarantee against unethical research

Mar 01, 2011 By MIKE STOBBE , AP Medical Writer

(AP) -- The nation has a "leaky system" for protecting patients in medical research, and it's possible - though unlikely - that the kind of unethical studies done in the past could occur again, bioethics experts told a presidential panel Tuesday in Washington.

The meeting was triggered by the government's apology last fall for federal doctors infecting prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala with 65 years ago.

The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues was told to explore the question of whether such a study could ever happen again. On Tuesday, the commission held its first public meeting on the topic and heard testimony from bioethicists, researchers and a historian.

Speakers noted that over the last several decades, as many as 1,000 ethical rules, regulations and guidelines have been enacted globally to ensure the ethical conduct of medical research. In the United States, there are rules to protect people in every study done by federal scientists, funded by federal agencies or those testing a product requiring federal approval to be sold.

But that oversight is inconsistent - ethical rules can vary among federal agencies. What's more, if federal funding or review is not involved, an unethical study could be done and no one in authority would ever know about it.

"We have a leaky system," said Eric Meslin, director of the Indiana University Center for Bioethics.

Dr. Robert Califf, Duke University's vice chancellor for clinical research, agreed there are weaknesses.

"It's night and day and what you could do in the `good old days' with no one knowing about it. But there's no 100 percent guarantee. There still will be bad things that will happen," he said.

The commission, ordered to report to President by September, was given two tasks:

-Examine federally funded international studies to make sure research is being done ethically. The commission named a 14-member international panel of experts to study the question.

-Take a more intensive look at the Guatemala study. More than a dozen commission investigators have already started poring through hundreds of boxes of old government documents.

What they will turn up is unknown, but there are doubtless more unethical studies from the past that have never been publicly reported, said Susan Lederer, a medical historian at the University of Wisconsin.

On Sunday, The Associated Press reported on dozens of studies from the past - most of them between 40 and 80 years ago - involving researchers deliberately infecting people to study the effects of diseases or to see if an experimental treatment might work.

The AP investigation itself was triggered by the Guatemala study.

At Tuesday's commission meeting, Lederer was the most pessimistic of five guest speakers about whether that kind of research could happen again.

"I don't think you should look to historians for optimism," she said.

Explore further: Color and texture matter most when it comes to tomatoes

More information: The Commission Web site: http://www.bioethics.gov/

4.5 /5 (2 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Guatemala STD study was 'wrong': US panel

Mar 01, 2011

The head of a bioethics commission convened by President Barack Obama said on Tuesday that a 1940s study of STDs using patients in Guatemala was wrong and that a US probe was continuing.

US apologizes for '40s syphilis study in Guatemala

Oct 01, 2010

(AP) -- American scientists deliberately infected prisoners and patients in a mental hospital in Guatemala with syphilis 60 years ago, a recently unearthed experiment that prompted U.S. officials to apologize Friday and ...

Past medical testing on humans revealed

Feb 27, 2011

(AP) -- Shocking as it may seem, U.S. government doctors once thought it was fine to experiment on disabled people and prison inmates. Such experiments included giving hepatitis to mental patients in Connecticut, ...

Feds to look at Apple policy on programming tools

May 04, 2010

(AP) -- Federal regulators plan to examine whether Apple Inc. is violating antitrust rules by requiring software developers to use Apple programming tools to create applications for the iPhone and iPad.

House member urges approval of Comcast, NBC deal

Aug 02, 2010

(AP) -- The head of the House subcommittee that deals with communications issues is calling on federal regulators to approve Comcast's plan to buy a controlling interest in NBC Universal with a handful of conditions attached ...

Recommended for you

Color and texture matter most when it comes to tomatoes

8 hours ago

A new study in the Journal of Food Science, published by the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT), evaluated consumers' choice in fresh tomato selection and revealed which characteristics make the red fruit most appealing.

How the lotus got its own administration

12 hours ago

Actually the lotus is a very ordinary plant. Nevertheless, during the Qing dynasty (1644-1911) a complex bureaucratic structure was built up around this plant. The lotus was part of the Imperial Household, ...

What labels on textiles can tell us about society

12 hours ago

Throughout Chinese history, dynastic states used labels on textiles to spread information on the maker, the commissioner, the owner or the date and site of production. Silks produced in state-owned manufacture ...

US company sells out of Ebola toys

Oct 17, 2014

They might look tasteless, but satisfied customers dub them cute and adorable. Ebola-themed toys have proved such a hit that one US-based company has sold out.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JOHNSPEAKS
not rated yet Mar 02, 2011
-You- have human rights violations done everyday as part of the treatment plan for mental health clients? This offical policy of the mental health industry is allowed because these supposed mental health professionals have lost any humanity for the mentally ill or mentally challenged etc.? When you loose -Full Time- personal touch with the clients and your bureaucratic approach to mental illness with all your advanced degrees? -You- have created a form of inbreeding that allows you to experiment on mental health clients and you don't realize or care about the suffering you cause? For many years I worked as a non professional in a mental health rehabilitation facility (FH) in northern new jersey and also interacted with another dozen mental heath facilities in the northeast? We interacted full time with the clients and gained their -Trust- and started to realize the horror of the mental health industry? Think twice before you get involved with the mental health industry?