Polar ice adding more to rising seas: study
Store Glacier, West Greenland. A new NASA funded study finds that the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are losing mass at an accelerating pace, three times faster than that of mountain glaciers and ice caps. Image credit: Eric Rignot, NASA JPL
(PhysOrg.com) -- The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are losing mass at an accelerating pace, according to a new NASA-funded satellite study. The findings of the study -- the longest to date of changes in polar ice sheet mass -- suggest these ice sheets are overtaking ice loss from Earth's mountain glaciers and ice caps to become the dominant contributor to global sea level rise, much sooner than model forecasts have predicted.
The nearly 20-year study reveals that in 2006, a year in which comparable results for mass loss in mountain glaciers and ice caps are available from a separate study conducted using other methods, the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets lost a combined mass of 475 gigatonnes a year on average. That's enough to raise global sea level by an average of 1.3 millimeters (.05 inches) a year. (A gigatonne is one billion metric tons, or more than 2.2 trillion pounds.)
The pace at which the polar ice sheets are losing mass was found to be accelerating rapidly. Each year over the course of the study, the two ice sheets lost a combined average of 36.3 gigatonnes more than they did the year before. In comparison, the 2006 study of mountain glaciers and ice caps estimated their loss at 402 gigatonnes a year on average, with a year-over-year acceleration rate three times smaller than that of the ice sheets.
"That ice sheets will dominate future sea level rise is not surprising -- they hold a lot more ice mass than mountain glaciers," said lead author Eric Rignot, jointly of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., and the University of California, Irvine. "What is surprising is this increased contribution by the ice sheets is already happening. If present trends continue, sea level is likely to be significantly higher than levels projected by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007. Our study helps reduce uncertainties in near-term projections of sea level rise."
Total ice sheet mass balance between 1992 and 2009, as measured for Greenland (top), Antarctica (middle) and the cumulative sum of both ice sheets (bottom), in gigatonnes per year, as measured by the two different methods used by the researchers: the mass budget method (solid black circles) and time-variable gravity measurements from the NASA/German Aerospace Center’s Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (Grace) satellites (solid red triangles). Image credit: NASA/JPL-UC Irvine-Utrecht University-National Center for Atmospheric Research
Rignot's team combined nearly two decades (1992-2009) of monthly satellite measurements with advanced regional atmospheric climate model data to examine changes in ice sheet mass and trends in acceleration of ice loss.The study compared two independent measurement techniques. The first characterized the difference between two sets of data: interferometric synthetic aperture radar data from European, Canadian and Japanese satellites and radio echo soundings, which were used to measure ice exiting the ice sheets; and regional atmospheric climate model data from Utrecht University, The Netherlands, used to quantify ice being added to the ice sheets. The other technique used eight years of data from the NASA/German Aerospace Center's Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (Grace) satellites, which track minute changes in Earth's gravity field due to changes in Earth's mass distribution, including ice movement.
The team reconciled the differences between techniques and found them to be in agreement, both for total amount and rate of mass loss, over their data sets' eight-year overlapping period. This validated the data sets, establishing a consistent record of ice mass changes since 1992.
The team found that for each year over the 18-year study, the Greenland ice sheet lost mass faster than it did the year before, by an average of 21.9 gigatonnes a year. In Antarctica, the year-over-year speedup in ice mass lost averaged 14.5 gigatonnes.
"These are two totally independent techniques, so it is a major achievement that the results agree so well," said co-author Isabella Velicogna, also jointly with JPL and UC Irvine. "It demonstrates the tremendous progress that's being made in estimating how much ice the ice sheets are gaining and losing, and in analyzing Grace's time-variable gravity data."
The authors conclude that, if current ice sheet melting rates continue for the next four decades, their cumulative loss could raise sea level by 15 centimeters (5.9 inches) by 2050. When this is added to the predicted sea level contribution of 8 centimeters (3.1 inches) from glacial ice caps and 9 centimeters (3.5 inches) from ocean thermal expansion, total sea level rise could reach 32 centimeters (12.6 inches). While this provides one indication of the potential contribution ice sheets could make to sea level in the coming century, the authors caution that considerable uncertainties remain in estimating future ice loss acceleration.
Study results are published this month in Geophysical Research Letters.
Provided by NASA
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
2 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
16 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (19) |
0
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
16 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
16 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
1
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
16 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
0
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...

Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (12)
It is like an echo chamber in here. Where are all the fossil fuel mouth pieces?
Must be out for lunch with the boss.
Or getting their dose of enthusiasm.
Maybe it is payday and they are at the pub.
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (12)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (11)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (9)
Climate model data? Does this mean what it seems to be saying?
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (11)
WOLF!!!!!!!!!
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (16)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (8)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (12)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (14)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (12)
They really don't seem to be concerned with the fact that if they're wrong about AGW, scientists will lose a lot of integrity. Even if AGW were true we wouldn't be able to stop it anyhow, without convincing China, India and the rest of the world to stop modernizing themselves. Besides, I don't think the ice ages were well known for food production. Somebody call me non-intellectual along with all the other predictable baggage.
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (11)
Gee that's funny I came to the exact opposite conclusion. Well not opposite, just that Europeans believe anything they're told from anyone in authority...the ultimate lemmings.
Baaaaaahhh....beeeeeeehhh.....
Good sheep!! Pretty sheep :)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
(It's a joke, not a reference to people)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (7)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (5)
Was that a deliberate joke, a minor typo, or are you actually confused about what El Nino and La Nina are, and what an unusually strong La Nina means?
La Nina is the cold surface phase, not the hot. The unusually strong La Nina we just had produced unusually cool sea surface temperatures. The relationship between La Nina/El Nino and arctic ice loss is extremely weak though, as it can have different final concequences on arctic weather patterns from one ENSO cycle to the next.
The PDO and NAO (pacific decalal and north atlantic oscillations) have a much stronger influence on polar weather than the ENSO (El Nino Souther Oscillation) cycles.
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (14)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Any idea what might have gone on in '95/'96? Seems like a drastic outlier compared to the rest of the trend.
But I agree with you in your comments. Frankly, to claim an "accelerating pace" without prior data comparison is poor wording in this article in the least. The loss of ice mass is a negative rate for sure, but according to the graphs, this rate has decelerated in the past 5 to 6 years.
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Can't get a link to post, so look up the NASA Earth Observatory home page, type "arctic sea ice" into their search box, wich brings up the page for Antarctic sea ice, then click on the link on the left margin that says "Arctic Sea Ice".
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
So, it's not really a strongly positive or negative effect, causing a positive effect on one side and the opposite on the other side.
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (9)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (8)
Feel free to add you brilliant thoughts to the discussion, and point out where you seem to think I have posted in error. It's no fun to just down-rate a post without bothering to say why. I eagerly await the inspiration of your wise comments.
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (8)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (4)
Care to back that up with data?
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Mar 09, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
It's a lot, so global warming should be a lot. The two correlate very well.
Mar 10, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
ht_delete_tp://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/09/antarctic-ice-models-not-correct-sea-level-rise-complicated/
Mar 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Well, they may not use that phrase, but the link is inferred. From the article:
and
Also, in the conclusions, they say that if the current rate continues for the next 100 years then sea level will rise xx amount. That's an AGW assumption. Without AGW it's absurd to assume the short trend we've seen will continue.
I didn't mention AGW in my comments either, but people who support it rated my comments low, although my sources are credible studies by reputable organizations.
Mar 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The story about the ice refreezing from the bottom was covered here on this site too. It didn't say that the overall growth/shrinking of the ice sheet has been measured wrong. It just said that there's a mechanism they didn't know about that causes ice at the bottom to move around in ways they didn't expect, causing a change in the directions of flow in the ice sheet that isn't accounted for in the models. It also means that the ice at the bottom in certain places may not be the oldest ice, wich has implications on interpreting ice cores. It's a big deal for the people who model the ice flows and may be the missing piece that explains why they've had so much trouble modeling it up to now. We should get way better ice flow models now that they discovered this.
I'm waiting to see if they still think the oldest ice core samples are original ice as they previously thought, or if it could be refrozen. I'm pretty sure that's being looked at now.
Mar 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
No typo, just an illustration of the effects of global warming. The current La Nina, now fading, is showing its peak effects on tropospheric cooling the last two months. Global temperatures are at the same as the El Nino's in 1995 and just a little cooler than '91 and '88. As you say it was a particularly sharp La Nina so wouldn't one expect global temperatures to be much cooler than recent El Nino's? Here's Dr Roy Spencer's (one of Watt's friends)graph to illustrate
h___ttp://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_Feb_2011.gif
Mar 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The answer is: No, global temperatures do not always follow the ENSO cycle. ENSO is just one of many regional events. The complicated ways that different combinations of all the cycles can come together on any given year is hard to predict (to the point of it being nearly chaotic in nature). The ENSO cycle alone doesn't predict the global temperature trend really.
Mar 10, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Mar 10, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Just wtf is going on here?
Mar 11, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Mar 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I thought it was a funny quote and immediately saw how that relates to so many of the 1/5 comment raters on this site. If you don't agree with their philosophy then you get 1/5, even if you just asked a question.
Mar 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
To the AGW critics, I would have to think MO's contribution is about as welcome as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's is to the 9-11 Troother gang.
Mar 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Rising sea levels = More rain fall = More potable drinking water for all.
Mar 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
So youre sure that the rising seawater wont seep ind and contaminate our drinking water ressources, actually leaving us with lesser drinking water?
Actually this global warming thing is pretty awesome - if it happens to be true, it will most probably fix it self, because humanity will perish. If it is wolfcrying, it will die out too.
Which makes me thinking that all this bickering is just a simple ego size dispute... or?
Mar 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 13, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
What, you missed the record rain falls, and snow levels we are having now?
Is that sea water or fresh?
Mar 13, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Maybe that's not what he really means. It's all about the mind-control chemicals in the contrails, allowing the Illuminati to lull the "sheeple" into somnolence so they will buy AGW theories. Tinfoil-lined hats are no longer enough, people.
(Yes, I AM joking. I realize that considering some of the postings made on PSORG in all seriousness, it can be hard to tell.)
Mar 14, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
No, it's been shown that what you say is likely, but those conclusions are not strong. The constraints on the magnitude of the effect are not well defined yet. The best data is only in temporate regions. Once again, you make it sound like certainty because a study says that it is likely. There's a difference between experimentally verified theory with strong mathimatical modeling and the contrail theory you are talking about. They are not sure yet, and that's the best you can say about that. Positive feedback? maybe. If it is a positive feedback, then that's good because it means that even less of the 20th century warming was due to co2 alone, so the fact that we can't stop creating co2 is slightly less troubling. ...If your contrail assertion is true.
Mar 14, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
We are not the most stupid people on earth but we are way ahead of number 2.
I hate to repeat myself but not only is global warming real and climate change caused almost solely by us but it is as bad or worse than the worst case predictions and we will see devastating effects before 2050, maybe well before.
The tsunami in Japan is a great analogy for how we do everything. Did they know tsunamis happen before they built those power plants on the shore? Could they have spent the billions, that they are now going to spend on rebuilding, beforehand on sea walls to prevent this damage to begin with? Do you honestly think the US will learn anything from this? All we do is retroact instead of proact. Thanks in no small part to idiot skeptics. We learn nothing from the past and are forever doomed to repeat it because we ARE stupid as a species and many live here in the US, too many.
Mar 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
"Do you honestly think the US will learn anything from this? All we do is retroact instead of proact. Thanks in no small part to idiot skeptics. We learn nothing from the past and are forever doomed to repeat it because we ARE stupid as a species and many live here in the US, too many."
I agree for the most part. The historical significance of your last paragraph is in print. It is easily accessible either from online sources or the local library and yet, here we are, essentially bound up in an endless loop not having learned from past mistakes.
As researchers, we find ourselves in the old 'publish or perish' cycle. That pressure is not always well tolerated and "think before you speak" or WRITE A PAPER doesn't always come into play. The 'politics' of scientific research are having a negative effect on what is printed and 'peer review' is not always what it should be.
The world is changing but it's inhabitants it seems, are not; at least in this regard.
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
??? Global temperature doesn't follow ENSO cycles.....really?
h__ttp://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/scale:10/from:1900/mean:12/plot/jisao-pdo/mean:12
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
This shows how ENSO affects temperatures in the tropics:
http/http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/4685/ensotropicsvg9.png
and this shows how the tropic temperatures affect global temperatures:
http/http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/1857/rsstropicsglobalqq9.png
Now thats what I call firm correlation!