Natural selection makes some relatives selfish, others altruistic

Mar 02, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Cain and Abel certainly displayed it and the three daughters of King Lear proved the point too - families contain a mixture of the selfish and those who put themselves out to help others.

Previous research has shown that these traits - selfishness and altruism - can be passed down through families. A new study from the University of Reading shows how determines the frequencies of selfishness and altruism in successive generations.

Studies in behavior genetics show that around 40% of the willingness to help others is inherited. Those who do not help others help themselves, and anti-social behavior is inherited too. Depending on the genotypes of their parents, children may all be , all altruistic or a mixture of both.

The Reading study, based on , suggests that the numbers of altruistic and selfish individuals in society are controlled by a law of diminishing returns. If there are only one or two altruists in a family, and their actions help others in the family sufficiently compared to the cost of the , then genes for altruism will do better than genes for selfishness, resulting in more altruists in the family tree. So eventually all individuals in the population may be altruistic. Alternatively, when there are many altruists natural selection may ensure that altruistic are less likely to be passed on.

This is because the extra altruists may not bring enough extra benefits to the family. For example, if someone needs shelter when injured or food when starving, the first individual to help may save their life. Latecomers may also attempt to help, but the additional benefit is less.

In other words, there are diminishing returns because there are limits to how much individuals can be helped. Altruists are selected when rare but selected against when common. The result is an evolutionary equilibrium with some individuals selfish and others altruistic.

The research was conducted by Professor Richard Sibly, of the School of Biological Studies, and Professor Robert Curnow, of the School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

Professor Sibly said: "Understanding how altruism evolved was of absorbing interest to Darwin and has continued to fascinate biologists ever since. Help comes in many forms, presumably with different genetic bases, for example, child rearing, provisioning during times of need, and defence of resources against competitors. Each and any of these may be subject to laws of diminishing returns. The form of the relationship between help received and number of helpers requires quantitative description. The expected mix of selfishness and can then be calculated using the new equations."

Explore further: Research confirms controversial Darwin theory of 'jump dispersal'

Provided by University of Reading

4.5 /5 (2 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Acting selfish? Blame your mother

Sep 02, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The fact that our female ancestors dispersed more than our male ancestors can lead to conflicts within the brain that influence our social behaviour, new research reveals.

The economics of nice folks

Jun 19, 2008

A basic tenet of economics is that people always behave selfishly, or as the 18th century philosopher economist David Hume put it, "every man ought to be supposed to be a knave."

Recommended for you

Study shows sharks have personalities

9 hours ago

Some sharks are 'gregarious' and have strong social connections, whilst others are more solitary and prefer to remain inconspicuous, according to a new study which is the first to show that the notorious ...

Alaska refuge proposes killing invasive caribou

12 hours ago

Federal wildlife officials are considering deadly measures to keep an Alaska big game animal introduced more than 50 years ago to a remote island in the Aleutians from expanding its range.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

breadhead
1 / 5 (2) Mar 05, 2011
So then it is OK that I was born with a trait of not believing in macro-evolution? This is saying that it is NOT any fault of mine? So that I am not seen as selfish, let me help by saying that Jesus Christ is the son of God, the world was created in 6, 24 hour days. Your attempts to prove otherwise are in vain. If only the writers of the article would read more than the story of Cain and Abel.