Japan quake causes day to get a wee bit shorter

Mar 12, 2011 By SETH BORENSTEIN , AP Science Writer
Earth

You won't notice it, but the day just got a tiny bit shorter because of Friday's giant earthquake off the coast of Japan.

NASA geophysicist Richard Gross calculated that Earth's rotation sped up by 1.6 microseconds. That's because of the shift in Earth's mass caused by the 8.9-magnitude . A microsecond is one-millionth of a second.

That change in rotation speed is slightly more than the one caused by last year's larger earthquake. But 2004's bigger Sumatra earthquake caused a 6.8-microsecond shortening of the day.

The Japan quake is the fifth strongest since 1900.

Read also: Chilean Quake May Have Shortened Earth Days

Explore further: Japan volcanic isle may collapse, create tsunami, study says

3.8 /5 (20 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Chile aftershocks could go on for years: scientists

Mar 05, 2010

Chileans will be feeling aftershocks from the devastating 8.8-magnitude earthquake for months and possibly years to come, scientists said Friday, as three strong tremors rocked the country.

Fewer earthquake fatalities in 2005

Jan 14, 2006

There were fewer deaths worldwide in 2005 due to earthquakes, but almost 90,000 casualties were reported, the U.S. Geological Survey reported.

Did the Chilean Quake Shift Earth's Axis?

Mar 11, 2010

Pictures of widespread devastation leave no doubt: Last month's 8.8 magnitude earthquake in coastal Chile was extremely strong. Indeed, say NASA scientists, it might have shifted the axis of Earth itself.

Chile quake in 'elite class' like 2004 Asian quake

Feb 28, 2010

(AP) -- The huge earthquake that struck off the coast of Chile belongs to an "elite class" of mega earthquakes, experts said, and is similar to the 2004 Indian Ocean temblor that triggered deadly tsunami ...

Quake is 5th biggest, but Japan best prepared

Mar 11, 2011

(AP) -- Take the world's most earthquake-prepared country, jolt it with one of the biggest quakes in history and add a devastating tsunami minutes later. In the classic battle of Man vs. Nature, Nature won again.

Recommended for you

NASA sees Depression 12-E become Tropical Storm Lowell

13 hours ago

In less than 24 hours after Tropical Depression 12-E was born in the eastern Pacific Ocean it strengthened into Tropical Storm Lowell. NOAA's GOES-West and NASA's Aqua satellite captured infrared images of ...

Why global warming is taking a break

14 hours ago

The average temperature on Earth has barely risen over the past 16 years. ETH researchers have now found out why. And they believe that global warming is likely to continue again soon.

User comments : 12

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

snowman95
5 / 5 (7) Mar 12, 2011
An earthquake can also lengthen a day. In the long run the effects of quakes cancel each other out. The long term slowing of the earth due to tidal locking (with the moon) is still the dominant effect. NASA stated 2.3 milliseconds per century, though I've seen other sources at 1.4 ms.
plasticpower
5 / 5 (2) Mar 12, 2011
So after about 500,000 years our day will be a second shorter?
snowman95
5 / 5 (2) Mar 12, 2011
If the tidal deceleration lengthened the day by 2 ms/day per century, a billion years would find the day about 5 1/2 hrs longer. I'd bet the effect of the moon was more pronounced earlier in earth's history because it was so much closer.
2*(10^-3)*(10^9/100)/60/60 = 5.556 hrs., implying that the day was really short 4 billion yrs. ago, assuming that the oceans were in place to contribute tidal friction.
trekgeek1
4 / 5 (4) Mar 12, 2011
If the tidal deceleration lengthened the day by 2 ms/day per century, a billion years would find the day about 5 1/2 hrs longer. I'd bet the effect of the moon was more pronounced earlier in earth's history because it was so much closer.
2*(10^-3)*(10^9/100)/60/60 = 5.556 hrs., implying that the day was really short 4 billion yrs. ago, assuming that the oceans were in place to contribute tidal friction.


Many creationists have done that calculation unsuccessfully in an attempt to show that billions of years ago the Earth would have been spinning so fast that animals would have been practically thrown around. Your number seems reasonable, good job.
ryggesogn2
1.4 / 5 (10) Mar 12, 2011
"BBCs Hawksley implicitly suggests that man-made climate change also contributed to the Japanese earthquake."
http://www.sovere...?p=15770

Global warming did it.
Ramael
5 / 5 (4) Mar 12, 2011
From what I've read, when the earth first formed the day was 8 hours long, then the collision that formed the moon shortened that to 5 hours. But the moon was 200 times larger from the earth's perspective, and its gravitational pull supposedly cause the hot new crust of the earth to rise by about a mile when the moon was directly overhead. Of course this affect rapidly decreased as the moon grew in distance from the earth, at a gradually slower rate over because of the reduced tidal interactions at the gradually increasing distances.

At that rate, by the time anything started crawling on the earth, the earth was likely already past the 20 hour day mark.
Skeptic_Heretic
5 / 5 (4) Mar 12, 2011
"BBCs Hawksley implicitly suggests that man-made climate change also contributed to the Japanese earthquake."
http://www.sovere...?p=15770

Global warming did it.

Well that's a lie.
Stephen_Druesedow
Mar 12, 2011
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Fiona_Myrglwitz
1 / 5 (2) Mar 13, 2011
how come no-one is blaming it on the particle accelerator?
Global warming is such a crock! But consider this, the weight of all that water coming inland could be enough to set the next tremor off.
Since Japan is dislocated from it's previous position what is now under pressure? (there were five in the bed and the little one said roll over....)
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (4) Mar 13, 2011
"BBCs Hawksley implicitly suggests that man-made climate change also contributed to the Japanese earthquake."
http://www.sovere...?p=15770

Global warming did it.

Well that's a lie.

Those are the people, AGWites, so many here support and defend.
NickFun
5 / 5 (1) Mar 13, 2011
I always rely on that extra millisecond of sleep! ;)
dan42day
1 / 5 (3) Mar 14, 2011
Well if global warming caused it, then it was Bush's fault.
Skeptic_Heretic
not rated yet Mar 14, 2011
Well that's a lie.

Those are the people, AGWites, so many here support and defend.
Again Mr. Swenson, reading skills are important.

Your source is lying.