iPads fuel flight of paperless planes

Mar 18, 2011 By Alan Levin

Tablet computers such as the iPad are revolutionizing aircraft cockpits as tens of thousands of private pilots bring the powerful mini-computers into planes. Several of the nation's largest airlines are poised to follow suit.

The this year for the first time granted approval for two commercial operators to use iPads instead of the bulky paper charts and manuals that pilots have been required to carry since the birth of modern aviation. Alaska Airlines is testing iPads in some of its planes, and Delta Air Lines and say they're planning on launching tests soon.

Safety advocates also are enthusiastic about tablet computers, but warn that there could be a downside: more distractions in the cockpit. "It's a two-sided coin," says National Chairman Debbie Hersman.

While the devices could become inexpensive safety warning systems for weather and other uses, distractions have increasingly played a role in NTSB accident investigations. On Oct. 21, 2009, a Northwest Airlines flight crew working on their laptops stopped talking to controllers and flew past their destination.

Concerns about distractions have not slowed sales of the devices. Private pilots, who do not need FAA approval to use the devices, have vaulted aviation software firms into the top-seller lists at Apple's App Store. Pilots say the iPad is faster, lighter and more versatile than paper. Another attraction is cost: airlines are hoping to save millions of dollars a year in reduced fuel and paper.

"Any pilot who looks at it, wants it," says Michael Klein, president of OpenAir, a Gaithersburg, Md., charter operator. "It's better than paper. It does everything for you. It's amazing."

Klein says he uses the iPad on all his personal flights and is hoping to receive FAA permission soon to use it while carrying paying customers.

Before commercial operators can use the iPad, they have had to demonstrate to the FAA that it can withstand an explosive decompression, that it doesn't emit radio waves that could interfere with a plane's electronics and that it is reliable.

The FAA also shares the concern about the device becoming a possible distraction, says spokesman Les Dorr. Under a directive issued after the Northwest incident, airlines are expected to improve training and review internal policies to ensure that electronic devices do not create distractions, Dorr says.

The rush to bring iPads into the cockpit has helped the fortunes of aviation firms, both large and small.

The iPad app for pilots created by a four-person Houston software firm, ForeFlight, became the largest grossing weather-related app at Apple.

"It has really vaulted our company into the stratosphere," says Tyson Weihs, a co-founder of the company. Weihs predicts that by year's end 25 percent of the nearly 600,000 licensed pilots will be using iPads or similar devices when they fly.

Jeppesen, which supplies airlines with paper charts, has also entered the market, already selling versions of its software for the .

Explore further: Apple to open 25 new stores in China in the next two years

1 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Lawmakers seek ban on laptops in airliner cockpits

Nov 03, 2009

(AP) -- Lawmakers are moving to ban the use of computer laptops and other personal electronic devices in airline cockpits to prevent another incident like the Northwest Airlines plane that overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles.

New system helps aircraft avoid turbulence

Sep 06, 2007

A new turbulence detection system now being tested is successfully alerting pilots to patches of rough air as they fly through clouds. The system, designed by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) ...

Apple iPad supply catching up to demand

Aug 31, 2010

Apple on Monday promised that US orders for its iPad tablet computers would ship within 24 hours, in a sign that supply of the hot-selling devices was catching up to demand.

EasyJet to test infrared ash detectors on planes

Jun 04, 2010

(AP) -- Low-cost airline easyJet PLC unveiled plans Friday to test infrared technology's ability to detect volcanic ash clouds and urged other airlines to help map the ash risk across Europe's skies.

Recommended for you

Microsoft drops Nokia name from smartphones

1 hour ago

Microsoft said Friday it was dropping the Nokia name from its Lumia smartphones, rebranding following the acquisition earlier this year of the Finnish group's handset division.

Amazon's loss makes holidays a question mark

2 hours ago

Amazon's trademark smile icon is becoming more of a grimace. The world's largest online retailer reported a wider third-quarter loss than analysts expected and gave a disappointing holiday forecast.

Ericsson profit down 10 pct despite higher sales

6 hours ago

Wireless equipment maker Ericsson says its third-quarter earnings slumped 10 percent despite higher sales due to increased operating costs and negative effects from currency hedging.

Glass maker deals to exit Apple, Arizona plant

9 hours ago

Nearly 2,000 furnaces installed in a factory to make synthetic sapphire glass for Apple Inc. will be removed and sold under a deal between the tech giant and the company that had been gearing up to produce huge amounts of ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

wealthychef
2 / 5 (1) Mar 18, 2011
I love the iPad, but what if the iPad fails? Paper has the advantage that its batteries never dies and it's not vulnerable to the types of failures that electronics are, such as breakage.
sherb
not rated yet Mar 20, 2011
I love the iPad, but what if the iPad fails? Paper has the advantage that its batteries never dies and it's not vulnerable to the types of failures that electronics are, such as breakage.

Obviously the device will be connected all the time. But malfunction of the device I guess the risk factor could be same as the components of an aircraft, like the communication device,etc. And ofcourse they could always keep the papers as backup in case anything goes wrong.