Greenhouse solar plant for cheaper extraction of oil

March 2, 2011 by Lin Edwards report

Greenhouse solar plant for cheaper extraction of oil

Enlarge

(PhysOrg.com) -- A Californian company has found a way to reduce the cost of making steam for use in extracting oil from old oil fields: they heat the water using free sunlight.

The new demonstration solar thermal steam plant at McKittrick in California uses sunlight concentrated by mirrors in a greenhouse to pre-heat water. is then used to boil the hot water to produce steam to heat the rock in the old oil field in order to scour out more oil and melt the thicker and heavier oils and extract them. In a full-scale plant the mirrors could be used to produce the steam, but in the pilot the wellhead is too far away from the greenhouse for piping the steam to be practical.

Vice president of business development at GlassPoint Solar, John O’Donnell, explained that producing steam is the largest cost in thermal extraction of oil. He said that with the solar assistance they can get 10-20 percent more oil from the same well because the cheaper steam means you can run the extraction longer.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

The demonstration plant covers an area of 650 square meters among the derricks of the oil field, which is owned by the Berry Petroleum Company. The plant consists of a greenhouse with a crenellated roof to maximize the exposure to sunlight. Two rows of seven-meter-wide mirrors are suspended from the top of the greenhouse and concentrate the sunlight onto tubes containing the water. The mirrors generate about a million British thermal units (BTUs) of heat each hour. The amount of steam needed depends on the age of the oil field, but is typically around two million BTUs per barrel of oil.

GlassPoint Solar says the steam can be produced at a cost of $3 to $3.50 per million BTUs, compared to around $4 per million BTUs with natural gas. Costs are also reduced because the greenhouse blocks the wind, which means lighter components can be used than in traditional solar thermal mirror systems (mostly used to make steam to drive generators) and the steel supports are no longer needed.

Greenhouse solar plant for cheaper extraction of oil
Enlarge


The greenhouse is at higher pressure than the outside, which prevents dust from collecting on the mirrors. The glass of the is kept clean using conventional automatic water sprayers as used in agricultural greenhouses, and the water is re-used.

A solar thermal power project being built by BrightSource Energy has been under construction since 2009, but the GlassPoint pilot plant took only six weeks to build. O’Donnell said a full scale plant could be built quickly.

Around 40 percent of Californian oil is extracted using steam heated by natural gas, and extraction is the greatest industrial use of natural gas in the state.

More information: http://www.glasspoint.com/

© 2010 PhysOrg.com

4.7 /5 (6 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Quantum_Conundrum
Mar 02, 2011

Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
Excellent example of a rube Goldberg machine. They won the prize with this one.

A) Use the free energy of the Sun to heat water. (If the bozos used vacuum tubes they could skip B all together.)

B) Burn natural gas to further heat water.

C) Use the water to extraction oil...so you can...burn it...

or they could just...

A) Use vacuum tubes and make electricity directly...
MrsButterworth
Mar 02, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
I'm just so happy that we're all saved! That was a close one!
djr
Mar 02, 2011

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
Agreed Quantum - I just checked - a barrel of oil has less than 6 million btu's. If they can produce steam at $3.50 per mbtu, that would be about $20 per barrell equilevant. It would seem to make a lot more sense to use the steam to generate electricity.
antialias
Mar 03, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
I think you're missing the point: Oil is an energy carrier that can be transported and stored easily/indefinitely. Electricity/heat can't. (and oil can be stored better/more efficiently than gas)

I love clean energy as much as anyone on the planet, but oil DOES have some advantages for specific applications where indefinite storage is needed (which basically means any application where usage must be independent of generation capacity over short periods of time)

This is why the battery/storage topic is a far hotter area of research in the alternative energy sector thna the generation of the energy itself. Until that is solved (or at least until there are satisfactory/cheap enough methods available) alternative energy will have a hard time competing with oil.
yoatmon
Mar 03, 2011

Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
I think you're missing the point: Oil is an energy carrier that can be transported and stored easily/indefinitely. Electricity/heat can't.

Are you sure that you're not missing the point?
My major concern is pollution with all the consequences that we and following generations shall have to bear. We must get away from fossils. Restrict their use for chemical processing; they're far to valuable to burn.
Transporting electric energy is even easier and cheaper than transporting any type of fossil fuel. Sustainable energy (solar) is clean and unlimited for the next 5 billion years.
Storage of electric energy is a bit more difficult (yet). There are viable methods to accomplish this and the sooner we get moving, the sooner these problems will be solved.
It's sad that there are too many people about, always willing to take the easiest, and cheapest way out. I guess it's just human nature to be selfish and egoistic and avoid, wherever possible, mental and physical productive work.
antialias
Mar 04, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
We must get away from fossils.

I completely agree. But that day is not yet here. To give us the time to make the change we need to move via hybrid methods (like the one in the article that saves a lot of extra gas that would have otherwise been needed) to cleaner methods. Something like a complete switchover can't be accomplished in one day (or one year ... or one decade)

Transport of electricity is OK (though still more wateful over long distances - expressed as a percentage loss - than lugging oil around via tankers). storage is the problem. I'm hoping they solve it very soon. Until then we will have to keep relying (at least partially) on oil and gas.
Rank 4.7 /5 (6 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Technology / Hi Tech & Innovation

created 15 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 12 | with audio podcast report

Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study

Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (21) | comments 52 | with audio podcast

Delphi gasoline-injection engine technique rivals hybrid's edge

(Phys.org) -- Running a diesel like engine on gasoline is something Delphi is doing in notable fashion. They claim they are on to a promising way to enjoy an engine that gives the vehicle owner high efficiency ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 21, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (18) | comments 37 | with audio podcast report

HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world

(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the company’s ultimate vision, successfully producing ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (15) | comments 17 | with audio podcast report

Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22

Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (11) | comments 18


Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit

Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.

Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision

Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.