Giant stars reveal inner secrets for the first time
This discovery has led to new insight into how stars evolve.
(PhysOrg.com) -- University of Sydney astrophysicists are behind a major breakthrough in the study of stars known as red giants, finding a way to peer deep into their cores to discover which ones are in early infancy, which are fresh-faced teenagers, and which are facing their dying days.
The discovery, published in the latest edition of the journal Nature and made possible by observations using NASA's powerful Kepler space telescope, is shedding new light on the evolution of stars, including our own sun.
The paper's lead author, the University of Sydney's Professor Tim Bedding, explains that "red giants are evolved stars that have exhausted the supply of hydrogen in their cores that powers nuclear fusion, and instead burn hydrogen in a surrounding shell. Towards the end of their lives, red giants begin burning the helium in their cores."
The Kepler space telescope has allowed Professor Bedding and colleagues to continuously study star light from hundreds of red giants at an unprecedented level of precision for nearly a year, giving a window into the stars' cores.
"The changes in brightness at a star's surface is a result of turbulent motions inside that cause continuous star-quakes, creating sound waves that travel down through the interior and back to the surface," Professor Bedding said.
"Under the right conditions, these waves interact with other waves trapped inside the star's helium core. It is these 'mixed' oscillation modes that are the key to understanding a star's particular life stage. By carefully measuring very subtle features of the oscillations in a star's brightness we can see that some stars have run out of hydrogen in the centre and are now burning helium, and therefore at a later stage of life."
Astronomer Travis Metcalfe of the US National Center for Atmospheric Research, in a companion piece in the same Nature issue which highlights the discovery's significance, compares red giants to Hollywood stars, whose age is not always obvious from the surface. "During certain phases in a star's life, its size and brightness are remarkably constant, even while profound transformations are taking place deep inside."
Professor Bedding and his colleagues work in an emerging field called asteroseismology. "In the same way that geologists use earthquakes to explore Earth's interior, we use star quakes to explore the internal structure of stars," he explained.
Professor Bedding said: "We are very excited about the results. We had some idea from theoretical models that these subtle oscillation patterns would be there, but this confirms our models. It allows us to tell red giants apart, and we will be able to compare the fraction of stars that are at the different stages of evolution in a way that we couldn't before."
Daniel Huber, a PhD student working with Professor Bedding, added: "This shows how wonderful the Kepler satellite really is. The main aim of the telescope was to find Earth-sized planets that could be habitable, but it has also provided us with a great opportunity to improve our understanding of stars."
Provided by University of Sydney
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
15 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (19) |
0
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
15 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
15 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
15 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
0
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
I look forward to learning if the cores of red giant stars are the same as the core of the Sun.
Neutron Repulsion [APEIRON (2011) in press]
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
The article isn't real clear, but are not "Red Giants", evolved from main sequence stars with masses in the range of ~0.5 solar masses to somewhere between 4 and 6 solar masses?
Can we not point at many "Red Giants" and say, "That is the Sun, 5 billion years from present"?
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
That is the popular view. But I never took a class in astronomy.
My research has been concerned mostly with nuclear and isotope studies of material in the solar system. Almost 50 years of measurements were required to finally convince us that the photosphere is simply a glowing sphere of waste products (91% H and 9% He) from the Sun's compact, energetic core - a neutron star.
H-fusion generates 35% of the Sun's energy today, but that fraction might change later and cause the Sun to become a "Red Giant."
I do not know. Perhaps studies like this will answer the question.
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
'Us' ??
I'm sorry, Dr Manuel but, IIRC, the neutron core hypothesis does not yet represent mainstream solar physics and may yet be disproven by helioseismology.
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (6)
Thanks for your comment.
I did not mean to imply that the neutron core hypothesis is mainstream.
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (6)
Coauthors include, for example
1. A professor of mathematics and statistics,
2. A bright high-school student from Germany,
3. Other professors with better credentials than me,
4. A freshman student who graduated in mathematics,
5. Other freshman students who now have PhD degrees.
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Yes, I know. I read your posts and try to digest what I understand.
But a hypothesis must be testable. The currently accepted view of main sequence stellar evolution matches well, the currently accepted view of main sequence stellar nuclear processes and the inescapable buildup of "ash" (helium) and the depletion of hydrogen as a fuel source. You say you do not know if main sequence stars evolve into Red Giants, yet the physics itself suggests that is the case.
How can your hypothesis be tested? Can your hypothesis explain the various observed populations of stars as a predictable outcome of neutron repulsion powering stellar bodies?
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
For instance, take a look at that picture attached to the article. Note how there is pretty much no room for heavy elements whatsoever. Given that the expected age of the universe is such that most stars form from some kind of supernova waste, you would have to expect a siginficant core of heavy elements.
Take the planets for example. They formed from the same waste as the Sun, yet most mainstream theories put the sun at some illogical % of H/HE.
Logically, the Sun has to have some large core of heavy elements, making up a high fraction of it's total mass. It could even be a neutron core, though that wouldn't have to be the case.
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (4)
That just doesn't fit well with me logically.
The Sun is so enourmously massive, that the combination of dense core and all the H/HE/etc sitting on top, should produce enough pressure to have varying degrees of fusion throughout the star, especially at the various element boundaries.
I could even see a transition from heavy element core, to a neutron core being the trigger for most supernova events.
Or not. Either way though, the mainstream theories are far too simplistic and illogical for me to put any stock into.
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Our hypothesis was developed to address experimental data:
a.) Missing solar neutrinos
b.) Age dating with short-lived radioactivities
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
c.) Solar mass-fractionation
www.omatumr.com/D...ata1.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
d.) Nucleogenetic anomalies of elements and isotopes in meteorites and planets
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
Turn the story around and say the observations are tests.
Does anyone here have a better explanation for the above data?
Mar 31, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
Discussed in these research papers:
1. "Attraction and repulsion of nucleons: Sources of stellar energy"
Journal of Fusion Energy 19, 93-98 (2001)
www.omatumr.com/a...tnuc.pdf
2. "Nuclear systematics: III. The source of solar luminosity",
Journal of Radioanalytical & Nuclear Chemistry 252, 3-7 (2002)
www.omatumr.com/a...sym3.pdf
3. "Neutron repulsion confirmed as energy source",
Journal of Fusion Energy 20, 197-201 (2003)
www.omatumr.com/a...nrep.pdf
"The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass",
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 69, 1847-1856 (2006)
http://arxiv.org/.../0609509
"Solar abundance of elements from neutron-capture
cross sections," LPSC, 1033 (2005)
http://arxiv.org/...412502v1
I regret that I will not be available to reply to any comments for a few days.
Apr 01, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (7)
http://arxiv.org/...91v1.pdf
What's the TOTAL mass of the Sun? Oh yeah, 1.00 solar masses, by definition.
But who cares about theory? It's not like we actually have ridiculous quantities of observations of stars in the process of forming amid giant molecular clouds, without any help from any neutron star cores... Oh wait, we do!
Oh, hell. That WOULD explain a lot. After all, why should one familiarize oneself with even the very basics of a field to which one aspires to contribute?
Naaah, existing knowledge and data are irrelevant, and definitely interfere with cranking.
Apr 01, 2011
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (5)
http://en.wikiped...Universe
How is that logical? The Sun is 99.86% of the solar system's mass. Its composition reflects the contents (and metallicity) of the protostellar nebula which gave birth to it. Why should that nebula have differed so drastically from the rest of the universe?
http://en.wikiped...tructure
Which ones? The giant gas bags, or the tiny rocky specks and asteroids that couldn't hold on to H/He gravitationally, so it all blew away when the Sun ignited?
Apr 01, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
The Sun's average density is measured at just ~1.4 times that of ordinary water at room temperature and pressure.
http://nssdc.gsfc...act.html
Considering the Sun's powerful gravity and large volume, most of its gaseous content is quite dense, even long before you get closer down to the core (where the pressures reach billions of atmospheres.) What room do you see for there being any significant concentrations of heavy elements, while keeping the Sun's overall density (as ratio of mass to volume) what is actually is?In bulk terms, that's right. It has to do with whether a given fusion reaction yields any energy, or actually soaks up energy. The moment a massive star can no longer generate sufficient energy at its core, it collapses and its outer layers blow away in a supernova. E.g. see here:
http://en.wikiped...ron_peak
Apr 02, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
5 Stars. You're on a roll today.
Apr 02, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Except that I've already proven mathematically exactly what happened to the Crab Nebula's missing mass, and it was not and cannot be any form of "Nuclear Fusion". Roughly 1/4 to 1/3rd of the mass ended up in the Neutron Star, a further 1/3rd ended up in the expanding nebula which is well above the escape velocity of the gravity well of the Neutron Star and the Cloud's mass combined, and the remaining 1/3rd of the original mass was completely annihilated in a matter-anti-matter annihilation. The math works so perfectly as to be almost completely beyond any chance of coincidence.
Nuclear Fusion alone is not capable of producing the energy levels needed to obtain escape velocity from a 10M star.
Apr 02, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 02, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
But no that doesn't leave behind a neutron star. Are you suggesting some kind of pair instability/core collapse super nova?
Apr 03, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Apr 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
What I suggested was that when the neutron star is forming as the core collapses, particle collisions caused by the insane gravity well fuse a huge amount of the remaining materials to Neutrons (but some of it ends up as anti-neutrons, which you'll need to check google and wikipedia about how that happens.) Once this happens, the anti-neutrons annihilate with the nuetrons.
Additionally, the nuclear chemistry for it all actually works, in theory, accurate to within a fraction of a solar mass, producing a total annihilation and precisely the amount of energy needed to overcome the gravity of the Crab and end up with the 1500km/s velocity of the expanding nebula.
In addition, you can figure the apparrent brightness of the crab from the historical record and use this plus the inverse square law to calculate how much energy...
Apr 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
When you do the math, which I did on the main forum a couple months ago, you find that the amount of energy released from the crab can only be consistent with it's observed brightness if it was indeed a matter-antimatter annihilation, as nuclear fusion, even total fusion of all matter to the heaviest elements, could not have produced that much energy to appear so bright from such a distance.
Apr 03, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
... ha ha ha ....
Apr 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
a.) The lower mass limit of 1.08 solar masses does not consider neutron repulsion.
Neutron repulsion causes neutron stars to emit neutrons. Neutrons "evaporate" from the surfaces of neutron stars as water evaporates from the surface of water.
www.youtube.com/w...yLYSiPO0
b.) Here are some experimental data that you ignore:
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...ata1.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
www.omatumr.com/i...Fig2.htm
www.omatumr.com/i...Fig1.htm
www.omatumr.com/i...Fig3.htm
www.omatumr.com/i...Fig4.htm
Apr 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
We addressed this misinformation in "Earth's Heat Source - The Sun" [Energy & Environment 20 (2009) 131.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0704
"Densities within the Sun span many orders of magnitude. The average overall density of the Sun, which depends on both internal structure and composition, may be as meaningless as the average overall density in the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom."
"The solar density is about 10^-6 g/cm^3 in the photosphere, and the density of material
in the nuclear solar core is at least equal to that of the atomic nucleus, ~10^+15 g/cm^3.
The Sun extends outward about 100 AU above the photosphere and has an average
overall density of about 1.4 x 10^-13 g/cm^3."
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Earth's density is almost 4 times higher than that of the Sun. And they're made of similar stuff, which means I'm an actual pink elephant.
Apr 10, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
No.
Read the information just above your post:
"The Sun extends outward about 100 AU above the photosphere and has an average overall density of about 1.4 x 10^-13 g/cm^3."
Earth's density is greater than the Sun's density by a factor of ~40,000,000,000,000.