US energy future hazy on Japan, environment fears

Mar 31, 2011 by Rob Lever
Trafic is seen near a series of wind turbines in California. The US faces tough questions as it tries to plot its energy future in the wake of the Japan nuclear disaster and long-running environmental and security concerns, analysts say.

The United States faces tough questions as it tries to plot its energy future in the wake of the Japan nuclear disaster and long-running environmental and security concerns, analysts say.

Natural gas appears to be gaining the inside track as the favored short-term source although coal, biofuels and renewables such as wind and solar power are also generating interest.

A report by the Washington-based Energy Policy Research Foundation says it would be difficult to replace the 5.5 of electric generating capacity at US nuclear plants with permits expiring in the next five years.

But if it had to be done, "natural gas would be the easiest and most economical," said Ben Montalbano, a senior research analyst at the think tank.

Despite efforts to produce power, he said this "still is in the test tube phase," he added. Renewable sources such as wind and solar energy "require large amounts of land and are very expensive."

John Rowe, chairman and chief executive of Exelon, a major US utility operator which operates several kinds of power generators, told a Washington forum recently that if new capacity is needed, "the answer is gas, gas, gas. The economics are driving you in one direction."

President , in a speech on energy policy, Wednesday reiterated his goal of cutting oil imports as part of his "Blueprint for A Secure Energy Future," as he called for more use of domestic natural gas and biofuels.

Daniel J. Weiss, senior fellow at the left-leaning Center for American Progress think tank, praised Obama's proposal but called for a "more aggressive" energy strategy that would derive at least 35 percent of electricity from renewable sources such as wind, solar, tidal and geothermal energy.

Weiss said the United States needs to move "more quickly because of the urgency to reduce our dependence on oil which has volatile prices and insecure sources."

Separately, US officials in March announced coal lease sales in Wyoming's Powder River Basin that contain an estimated 758 million tons of low sulfur coal. "Coal is a critical component of America's comprehensive energy portfolio," said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

An anti-nuclear protester is seen during a rally highlighting opposition to the fuel source. Experts note a new level of caution over atomic energy since the nuclear accidents in Japan

But with coal seen as too dirty and oil clouded by the massive BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico last year, much of the focus is now on natural gas.

Fueling interest in gas is what is believed to be a massive reserve in the so-called Marcellus Shale over a wide area of the eastern United States.

Pennsylvania State University's Terry Engelder estimates that the Marcellus shale holds between 168 trillion and 516 trillion cubic feet of gas that can be "easily produced."

Yet extraction requires a controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing or "fracking" -- injecting water mixed with chemicals into the rock formation.

Concerns have risen that fracking can pollute groundwater with toxic chemicals and possibly radioactive elements.

Montalbano said any worries about pollution from fracking can be solved with "simple engineering fixes."

But New York state has imposed a temporary moratorium on horizontal fracking, and some members of Congress are skeptical.

Representative Ed Markey has asked the Environmental Protection Agency for details on the practice.

"The natural gas industry has repeatedly claimed that fracking can be done safely. We now know we need a full investigation into exactly how fracking is done and what it does to our drinking water and our environment," Markey said in a February letter to the EPA.

The EPA has begun a review of fracking, findings of which are to be released in 2012.

Ernest Moniz, head of the Energy Initiative of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a member of the president's science advisory council, said that even though natural gas appears to be more economical, a national energy strategy should not rely on a single source.

Workers skim oil residue from the sea during the clean-up operation following the spill created by the Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf of Mexico.

"We have been through many significant excursions in natural gas prices over the last decade, resulting in caution about committing to only one fuel source," he told a congressional panel.

Still, the new caution since the nuclear accidents in Japan means "the cost of doing business at nuclear reactors will go up," he said.

Moniz, appearing before a congressional panel, said "small modular reactors" may be a better option for nuclear energy but would take time to develop.

Natural gas will likely be a short-term option amid pressures to reduce carbon emissions, he added. " does have emissions, but far less than coal, and will serve as a bridge to a very low emissions future," he said.

Weiss of the Center for American Progress said a big obstacle to any energy strategy is political.

He said the Republican opposition has been "reluctant to boost clean alternative sources at the expense of big oil."

Explore further: Scientists invent award winning 2-in-1 motor for electric cars

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Hundreds attend EPA hearing on Pa. gas drilling

Jul 22, 2010

(AP) -- Hundreds of people are attending a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hearing in southwestern Pennsylvania on a controversial natural gas drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking."

US asks firms to reveal gas extraction liquid

Sep 10, 2010

The US environmental regulator on Thursday asked gas companies to reveal what chemicals are used in deep extraction, addressing concerns by residents that their drinking water is being contaminated.

Obama seeks new path to environmental goals

Jan 27, 2011

(AP) -- Facing a Congress that is more hostile to environmental regulation, President Barack Obama is moderating his environmental goals: a clean energy standard that mixes nuclear, natural gas and "clean ...

European power plants boosting coal use

Apr 24, 2008

High oil and natural gas prices, coupled with increased demand, are driving Europe's return to coal-fired power plants, an industry official says.

Solar goes Hyper in the U.S.

Feb 21, 2011

As the U.S. government continues to heap billions in subsidies to the world's wealthiest coal and oil companies, the solar industry has been struggling to make it in the United States. This is sad for many reasons, not the ...

Recommended for you

First self-contained step dimming LED tube

21 hours ago

Samsung Electronics today introduced the industry's first AC Direct step-dimming LED linear replacement for T8 and T12 fluorescent tubes at the National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) Convention ...

Battery system will be able to light 2,500 homes

21 hours ago

One of the largest, most environmentally-friendly, battery-based energy storage systems in the nation will be installed at the University of California, San Diego the campus announced today (Sept. 29).

NREL software tool a boon for wind industry

23 hours ago

Wind energy is blowing away skeptics—it's so close to achieving cost parity with fossil fuels that just a little extra efficiency is all that is likely needed to push it into the mainstream and past the ...

Harvesting energy from walking

Sep 30, 2014

A device that fits into a shoe harvests the energy made by walking and successfully uses it in watch batteries.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gunslingor1
not rated yet Mar 31, 2011
Wow, not a bad article. Very unbiased.

Weiss of the Center for American Progress said a big obstacle to any energy strategy is political.

He said the Republican opposition has been "reluctant to boost clean alternative sources at the expense of big oil."

Couldn't agree more with that fellow.

When comparing nuclear to combustion turbines, I highly recommend you look at the fact that, the biggest fear with nuclear power is ground water contamination with radiation. This is occuring now with hydrolic fracking, not to mention 10,000 other chemicals which they claim are required for the fracking process, but are actually just industrial waste... they are using fracking as a way to dispose of toxic waste cheaply and to make money while doing it.

There are areas of the US where fracking has occured, where now, residents can light there water on fire. Gas producers have managed to keep this quite until recently.

Beard
not rated yet Apr 02, 2011
I don't understand why opinions would change after the Japan incident. If the entire United States were at risk of mega-quakes and 30 foot tsunamis; I would understand.

It makes no sense.
gunslingor1
not rated yet Apr 04, 2011
I don't understand why opinions would change after the Japan incident. If the entire United States were at risk of mega-quakes and 30 foot tsunamis; I would understand.

-Why? because those controlled by big oil think this gives them something to point at and spred fear and propagana about the competing and supieror technology. Well, I can point to millions of people a year being killing by fossil fuels, doesn't change a thing for me. Don't believe it.