CO2 emissions from biomass combustion

March 16, 2011

An article in the current issue of Global Change Biology Bioenergy proposes a new method to account for CO2 emissions from biomass combustion in bioenergy systems.

CO2 emissions resulting from bioenergy production have traditionally been excluded from most emission inventories and environmental impact studies because bioenergy is carbon- and climate- neutral as long as CO2 emissions from biofuel combustion are sequestered by growing biomass. Its climate impact has not therefore been considered.

Cherubini and coauthors propose that CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy should no longer be excluded from Life Cycle Assessment studies or be assumed to have the same global warming potential as anthropogenic CO2 emissions. is emitted when biomass is burnt and the sequestration in the new vegetation can be spread for up to several decades in the case of slow-growing biomass, like forests.

The authors believe that the global warming potential of CO2 emissions from bioenergy production depends on the interactions with the full and its sinks, the oceans and the terrestrial biosphere, which work on different time scales. Most significant is the formulation of Impulse Response Functions to predict atmospheric decay of CO2 emissions from biomass combustion and the adoption of an index to estimate the contribution of those emissions to global warming.

According to Dr. Francesco Cherubini, Postdoctoral Fellow at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), "This work reduces the inaccuracy of CO2 accounting in environmental impact studies, and is a first step towards the development of an accurate and standardized procedure for quantifying the effective of CO2 emissions from biomass ."

Explore further: Pricing can cut CO2 emissions from electric generators

More information: www.gcbbioenergy.org/

Related Stories

Pricing can cut CO2 emissions from electric generators

April 28, 2008

Levying a price on carbon dioxide released by electric generators could considerably reduce greenhouse gas emissions — even before the deployment of any environmentally friendly technology — according to scientists in ...

New tool gets handle on cropland CO2 emissions

February 9, 2009

For the first time, farmers have data that tracks at the county level on-site and off-site energy use and carbon dioxide emissions associated with growing crops in the United States.

CO2 emissions continue significant climb

November 24, 2009

The annual rate of increase in carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels has more than tripled in this decade, compared to the 1990s, reports an international consortium of scientists, who paint a bleak picture of the Earth's ...

Recommended for you

Ice sheets may be more resilient than thought

September 3, 2015

Sea level rise poses one of the biggest threats to human systems in a globally warming world, potentially causing trillions of dollars' worth of damages to flooded cities around the world. As surface temperatures rise, ice ...

Clues from ancient Maya reveal lasting impact on environment

September 3, 2015

Evidence from the tropical lowlands of Central America reveals how Maya activity more than 2,000 years ago not only contributed to the decline of their environment but continues to influence today's environmental conditions, ...

Climate ups odds of 'grey swan' superstorms

August 31, 2015

Climate change will boost the odds up to 14-fold for extremely rare, hard-to-predict tropical cyclones for parts of Australia, the United States and Dubai by 2100, researchers said Monday.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
1 / 5 (1) Mar 16, 2011
It is easy to "account for CO2 from biomass combustion."

1 C (from biomass) + 1 O2 (from air) =>
1 CO2 (combustion product from biomass)

The problem is to convince the public that CO2 is a dangerous air pollutant - after climatologists were caught hiding and manipulating the experimental data to "hide the decline" in the global temperatures that Al Gore, world leaders, the UN's IPCC, the US National Academy of Sciences, the UK's Royal Society, and the Norwegian Noble Prize Committee were promoting.

That is the problem.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.