Research sheds new light on black holes
(PhysOrg.com) -- The quantum phenomenon which is thought to cause black holes to leak energy and ultimately explode is more common than first thought according to Victoria University researchers.
Physicist Stephen Hawking famously discovered in 1973 that black holes are not entirely black. Instead, a subtle quantum effect results in them losing energy and particles into space, causing them to shrink and, over trillions of years, disappear. Until Hawkings discovery, black holes were considered to have such a strong gravitational field that nothing could escape.
Research led by Matt Visser, Professor of Mathematics at Victoria, has shed new light on the theory, known as Hawking Radiation, by calculating the conditions that would be needed for radiation leaks.
"We now believe there are a number of theoretically plausible objects in the universe that emit Hawking Radiation. Its more robust and more prevalent than scientists thought."
While Hawkings discovery is widely accepted in the scientific world, no observational astronomer has yet seen a black hole exploding. The final moments are thought to involve several hundred tonnes of matter converting itself to energy in 2 or 3 seconds, causing an explosion that would dwarf any nuclear weapon ever envisaged.
Professor Vissers research team, which includes colleagues in Spain and Italy, has also provided new information about what happens just before a black hole disappears.
"It is the last few seconds we dont understand. Our work has helped us to probe that period more closely and we have produced calculations that work down to the last few millionths of a second.
"It sounds good from the outside and it has added significantly to our understanding of what happens right at the end. However, a lot of unanswered questions remain."
Scientific papers on the research findings have recently been published in the Journal of High Energy Physics and in Physical Review D (the American Physical Society journal of particles, fields, gravitation & cosmology).
Professor Visser says discovering that Hawking Radiation is a more frequent occurrence helps unravel some of the mysteries of the Universe, but is not a cause for alarm.
"Wed have to be incredibly unlucky for a small black hole to wander into our solar system just before it was due to explode. Its very very unlikely."
Another area of Professor Vissers research is analogue spacetimes which are ways of mimicking gravity using simpler physical systems. One example is modelling acoustic black holes using sound in a moving fluid.
A former student of Professor Vissers is setting up a laboratory in Trieste, Italy, where she hopes to construct an experiment using sound in moving fluid, to observe Hawking Radiation and test the various theories about how it works.
"We would love to have a direct experience of the Hawking effect but the most likely way we will see it is by using some kind of analogue model.
"Distance is not the issue, its that there are lots of sources of radiation in the Universe and whats being emitted by a black hole, even at the end, would be dwarfed by other sources. The last few seconds of a black holes existence would be impressive by human standards but not by cosmological ones."
Provided by Victoria University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Question about induced E field.
1 hour ago
-
Charging a capacitor in a tesla coil
1 hour ago
-
Water Rocket
4 hours ago
-
why do trucks have bigger brakes?
9 hours ago
-
Solar Sail Physics - Do they work on a large scale?
10 hours ago
-
How should I switch an air conditioner off?
10 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (20) |
47
|
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?
The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.
May 21, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (3) |
8
Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector
A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...
May 21, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (16) |
7
|
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Mar 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 23, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (4)
A quick glance at the Wikipedia entry on "Hawking radiation" shows at least two problems with the HR hypothesis (not: "discovery").
Mar 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The object at the center of our galaxy is about 4 million solar masses, calculated by observing the orbits of the stars closest to it. Can you suggest any other possible type of object this massive? If not, would you consider black holes eternal? Aren't there any "problems" with that?
Mar 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
But there seems to be a huge gap between the mathematical concept of a singularity and physical reality where infinities are not possible for several reasons. This is a problem of the model. Obviously, GR cannot tell us all we want to know.
Mar 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Would you agree with me if I'd say that any functional system must appear eternal and infinite for any observer that is bound to only roam within it?
That may be true. Would you suggest we stop all progress in this field until the nature of black holes has been fully proven, or continue the research with the best assumption we have (and we do have some pretty solid theories)? Would you agree that ignoring obstacles for now may lead research to a point where these obstacles can more easily and at a lesser "cost" be parried?
Mar 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
2) Can you give me one single hypothetical example of such a system? (Of course it must have functional and compatible physical laws)
3) I can only assume you answer no to both questions. If you do answer no to the latter you're implying that ignoring Newton and going straight to Einstein would have been "easier" or "cost efficient." Which only shows you don't quite understand the notion of evolution, or rather: the necessity of evolution.
Mar 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
No.
No.
No.
It doesn't matter what I understand and what I don't understand. But I don't see any necessity to postulate the necessity of evolution when it's alive and kicking.
Mar 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet