Solar goes Hyper in the U.S.
February 21, 2011 By Karl Burkart
As the U.S. government continues to heap billions in subsidies to the world's wealthiest coal and oil companies, the solar industry has been struggling to make it in the United States. This is sad for many reasons, not the least of which is that we're missing out on one of the biggest growth industries in the world.
Currently there are 16 gigawatts of installed solar power globally. That number will grow to about 1,800 gigawatts in the next 20 years, making it one of the best job creators. U.S. engineers invented the solar panel, and the U.S. should be dominating that market. Instead, foreign manufacturers (particularly in China) have taken our IP and run with it, as we become increasingly dependent on foreign oil and dirty coal operations to meet our power needs.
Fortunately HyperSolar, a new U.S. company, offers a ray of sunny hope on the clean energy frontier.
The company does not manufacture solar panels. It makes them ultra-efficient using a field of science called photonics. Similar to a microchip that moves individual bits of data around at hyperspeed, HyperSolar's thin magnifying film routes and separates specific light spectrums, delivering them exactly where they're needed to make an array of PV solar cells ultra-efficient.
I saw an early prototype for such a magnifying optical layer a few years back, but the company was "dark" at the time, so I couldn't write about the innovation. But I'm as excited now as I was then for good reason - HyperSolar's optical layer can increase PV efficiency by up to 300 percent!
Theoretically that means cutting the installation cost of a solar array in half. Instead of a home solar system costing $30,000 (or more) it would only cost $15,000 (or less), making the upfront investment much lower and payback periods much quicker.
This is a great example of a disruptive technology that could get us to the holy grail of "grid parity" - meaning that solar would be as affordable as other sources of energy like coal and natural gas. And no more polluting coal mines or fracking for natural gas! The sun (for at least the next 5 billion years) will provide free and abundant energy. It's up to us whether we want to invest in that technology or continue to destroy our beautiful landscapes for a few more years of "cheap" (i.e. heavily subsidized) coal.
Innovations like this make several recent reports ring true. If we have the political will to overcome the stranglehold of the fossil fuel industry on our nation's energy policy, we could become 100 percent renewably powered in a 2030-2050 time frame. Check out these two reports and a new study by the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) about how large-scale wind power is now cost-competitive with natural gas:
- Physorg.com: 100 percent renewables by 2030: http://www.physorg … -energy.html
- WWF: 100 percent renewables (no nuclear) by 2050: http://wwf.panda.o … tive-by-2050
- AWEA: Wind cost-competitive with gas: http://www.ecogeek … article/3422
(c) 2011, Mother Nature Network.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
30 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
16 hours ago
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
-
Question from a non-engineer: Pulley Systems
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (20) |
50
|
Delphi gasoline-injection engine technique rivals hybrid's edge
(Phys.org) -- Running a diesel like engine on gasoline is something Delphi is doing in notable fashion. They claim they are on to a promising way to enjoy an engine that gives the vehicle owner high efficiency ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (11) |
18
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Large scale wind isn't even competitive with solar. It's only advantage over solar is that it works rain or shine, day or night, BUT in most cases, Solar is around 5 to 10 times more productive per unit area of land used.
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Reading on sugar production, I was surprised that cane is considered among the most efficient converters at about 1%. 1% of 1350 Watts is 14 Watts. The Solar Constant, nevermore.
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
You are talking about biofuels. I'm talking about solar steam power and photovoltaics.
But I agree, biofuels sucks. It's a waste of time, money, land, and fertilizer.
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (5)
Not to mention their effects on world commodity prices. Higher food prices are affecting the political unrest in the middle east. The AGW priesthood wants us to believe that people will die if we don't get off of fossil fuels, yet our insane biofuel policies are killing people right now!
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (9)
Damn where do all these dumbass people come from? its not even funny anymore.
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
I will refrain from name calling and suggest you read up on ethanol production. Waste is not currently used because cellulosic ethanol production is not yet possible.
http:DELETE//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corn_ethanol
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (4)
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (5)
I am familiar with the process. Waste from any source can be used in that way. How in any way does that negate my argument that turning food into fuel is bad policy- environmentally, economically, politically, and most of all- morally!
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Not quite true, atmospheric refraction and ground reflectance can add quite a bit to solar density in any given cubic meter on the surface of the Earth, infact 5 ideal square meters could in some geologic locals intersect 12-15 kw/h for the cubic meter of space it takes up which is higher then the solar constant but still only the product many cubic meters worth reflecting through that point.
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Feb 21, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
LOL.
You know nothing about farming obviously, because virtually nothing goes to "waste". Quite literally, anything that doesn't end up in the market ends up as animal feed.
The bones of cattle aren't wasted either. They are used to make gelatin.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
Besides products of pyrolesis are fine for animal food and soil fertilization.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
You must get your facts from FOX. That would also explain your behavior.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
No, i am from europe, so it would be reasonable to think that food isnt used for fuel production, we just arent that stupid/greedy.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
There seems to be a simple solution to that: cut the subsidies.
Biofuel is not comparable to wind or solar. Simply adding up energy gained by square meter doesn't cut it. Biofuels are storable. They have extremely high energy densities (when compared to any type of storage system for electric power). Plus: Plants grow more or less by themselves. They are extremely cheap to produce - even for people who do not have the money to invest into other types of energy production (solar/wind/etc. ). And they will grow in places where solar/wind make no sense.
Solar and wind have their advantages, too (I'm in no way disparaging them). All these technologies have their place in a healthy/sustainable mix. In germany we tested a setup of such diversity on a small scale. Biofules took up the slack when sun/wind wasn't available. The system was able to deliver BASE LOAD all year long - showing that other energy types CAN be made obsolete.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Human food calorie usage 2010 : 21 exajoules.
Even if biofuels are 10 times more efficient than food crops, you would need to DOUBLE world farmland in order to provide 1/3rd of current world energy consumption, not even counting world energy consumption is going to increase 40% in the next 10 to 20 years.
So if you DOUBLED the amount of world farmland over the next 20 years, that would provide maybe 220 exajoules per year, however, energy demand will have gone UP roughly 264 exajoules.
So in reality, in order to match demand for fuels, you'd need to TRIPLE world farmland, not counting increased food demand, in order to get the "non-biofuels" energy use down to 480 exajoules per year.
So by 2030, world pop will be 8 billion, and energy consumption will be 925 exajoules per year, biofuels for 440 exajoules of it, by tripling farming!?!
Tripling farming is impossible without multi-storied hydroponics facilities.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Floating platform farms in the oceans, could increase "farm land," but those would be very, very expensive.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
That's pretty wrong since the part that is used for food is usually only a small part of the plant. Additionally there are plenty grasslands or other 'non food yielding' areas that can provide plant matter for biofuels.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Wrong. That value is the actual calories consumed by humans.
You are also wrong about the plants, because almost all of the "waste" of the plants is used to make animal feed, which is highly efficient because it keeps this stuff from being a total waste while continuing to provide more food. "culls" are used for seeds for the following season.
In the case of many food crops, we eat more than half the mass of the plant, including the sweetest, starchy parts:
Lettuce and cabbages
turnips and greens
carrots
potatoes
onions
beets
cauliflower and broccoli
pineapple
sugar cane
tomato
Where? We're already cutting down rainforests and everything else to make room either for cities or farms.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
solar-lamp.chinaeu.de
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
yes, but most plants contain a lot of parts (stems, leaves, roots) which are not consumable by humans. Arguing that we want to replace ALL energy consumption with biofuels is a strawman. Biofules can be used for those parts which require
- long range travel (i.e. high energy density)
- long storage of energy
- immediate availability of energy irrespective of weather factors to tide over troughs in solar/wind/wave energy production
If you factor in that food waste is high (e.g. in the US 20% of all food ends up in landfills). It is estimated that 40-50% of food produced worldwide is not consumed. There's plenty of material around to up biofuels to a level where they make sense without having an impact on either food prices or food availability.
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Yah no kidding! I'm amazed nobody remarked on this until now. Nothing more off-putting than cheerleading in what's supposed to be a scientific publication. WTF.
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet