Rewrite the textbooks: Findings challenge conventional wisdom of how neurons operate
Brain diagram. Credit: dwp.gov.uk
(PhysOrg.com) -- Neurons are complicated, but the basic functional concept is that synapses transmit electrical signals to the dendrites and cell body (input), and axons carry signals away (output). In one of many surprise findings, Northwestern University scientists have discovered that axons can operate in reverse: they can send signals to the cell body, too.
It also turns out axons can talk to each other. Before sending signals in reverse, axons can perform their own neural computations without any involvement from the cell body or dendrites. This is contrary to typical neuronal communication where an axon of one neuron is in contact with another neuron's dendrite or cell body, not its axon. And, unlike the computations performed in dendrites, the computations occurring in axons are thousands of times slower, potentially creating a means for neurons to compute fast things in dendrites and slow things in axons.
A deeper understanding of how a normal neuron works is critical to scientists who study neurological diseases, such as epilepsy, autism, Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia.
The findings are published in the February issue of the journal Nature Neuroscience.
"We have discovered a number of things fundamental to how neurons work that are contrary to the information you find in neuroscience textbooks," said Nelson Spruston, senior author of the paper and professor of neurobiology and physiology in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences. "Signals can travel from the end of the axon toward the cell body, when it typically is the other way around. We were amazed to see this."
He and his colleagues first discovered individual nerve cells can fire off signals even in the absence of electrical stimulations in the cell body or dendrites. It's not always stimulus in, immediate action potential out. (Action potentials are the fundamental electrical signaling elements used by neurons; they are very brief changes in the membrane voltage of the neuron.)
Similar to our working memory when we memorize a telephone number for later use, the nerve cell can store and integrate stimuli over a long period of time, from tens of seconds to minutes. (That's a very long time for neurons.) Then, when the neuron reaches a threshold, it fires off a long series of signals, or action potentials, even in the absence of stimuli. The researchers call this persistent firing, and it all seems to be happening in the axon.
Spruston and his team stimulated a neuron for one to two minutes, providing a stimulus every 10 seconds. The neuron fired during this time but, when the stimulation was stopped, the neuron continued to fire for a minute.
"It's very unusual to think that a neuron could fire continually without stimuli," Spruston said. "This is something new -- that a neuron can integrate information over a long time period, longer than the typical operational speed of neurons, which is milliseconds to a second."
This unique neuronal function might be relevant to normal process, such as memory, but it also could be relevant to disease. The persistent firing of these inhibitory neurons might counteract hyperactive states in the brain, such as preventing the runaway excitation that happens during epileptic seizures.
Spruston credits the discovery of the persistent firing in normal individual neurons to the astute observation of Mark Sheffield, a graduate student in his lab. Sheffield is first author of the paper.
The researchers think that others have seen this persistent firing behavior in neurons but dismissed it as something wrong with the signal recording. When Sheffield saw the firing in the neurons he was studying, he waited until it stopped. Then he stimulated the neuron over a period of time, stopped the stimulation and then watched as the neuron fired later.
"This cellular memory is a novelty," Spruston said. "The neuron is responding to the history of what happened to it in the minute or so before."
Spruston and Sheffield found that the cellular memory is stored in the axon and the action potential is generated farther down the axon than they would have expected. Instead of being near the cell body it occurs toward the end of the axon.
Their studies of individual neurons (from the hippocampus and neocortex of mice) led to experiments with multiple neurons, which resulted in perhaps the biggest surprise of all. The researchers found that one axon can talk to another. They stimulated one neuron, and detected the persistent firing in the other unstimulated neuron. No dendrites or cell bodies were involved in this communication.
"The axons are talking to each other, but it's a complete mystery as to how it works," Spruston said. "The next big question is: how widespread is this behavior? Is this an oddity or does in happen in lots of neurons? We don't think it's rare, so it's important for us to understand under what conditions it occurs and how this happens."
More information: The title of the paper is Slow Integration Leads to Persistent Action Potential Firing in Distal Axons of Coupled Interneurons. http://www.nature. … nn.2728.html
Provided by
Northwestern University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
30 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Potential Breakthrough in Seizure Control
17 hours ago
-
Popping/Cracked sternum.
21 hours ago
-
Which Mental Illness Encompasses This Problem?
22 hours ago
-
A question about drug tolerance
May 23, 2012
-
Poor nutrition leading to overeating?
May 23, 2012
-
Math and dyslexia?
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences
More news stories
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
2 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Medicine & Health / Alzheimer's disease & dementia
11 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Transvaginal mesh op restores pelvic organ prolapse at price
(HealthDay) -- Transvaginal mesh (TVM) procedures are effective for anatomical restoration of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but patients report a worsening of sexual function following surgery, according to ...
12 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Travel to high altitudes tied to Crohn's, colitis flare-ups
(HealthDay) -- People with inflammatory bowel disease, which includes Crohn's disease and colitis, may be at increased risk for flare-ups when they fly or travel to high altitudes for skiing or mountain climbing, ...
Medicine & Health / Inflammatory disorders
12 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
Feb 17, 2011
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (7)
Feb 17, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Is this similar to how memristors work? maybe you could use them to simulate a physical neural net.
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (5)
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Sometimes parts of the body react quickly to external stimuli, e.g. before we are consciously aware of the stimuli.
Is there a connection between slower axon communication and conciousness, or am I dreaming ?
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (4)
We may need a new term for it like apparent self awareness. If it happens there will be 2 camps that would argue about it forever, one will say it is and one will say it isn't. Just like a lot of other things.
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Not really since the neural nets in computer science are highly abstract.
Neural nets only model connections from node A to node B. The connections are parametrized by signal strengths and transmission times (in the simplest cases). In order to incorporate 'slow' axon action you just need to model each biological axon as two connections: one slow and one fast.
To model the 'axon computation' mentioned in the article you insert a virtual node in each connection (i.e. you treat each connection also like a node).
Neural nets are modelled in software, not hardware (there used to be some dedicated hardware but it has long been superceded by software modeling). Hardware has the disadvantage that it's tricky to make/break connections to other nodes or insert/delete nodes dynamically.
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Yes, but software simulation is much slower and so the more complex the simulation, the slower it becomes.
Also true, which is why it's difficult to make progress. FPGA's have the reconfigurability, but simply can't approach the complexity required.
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Actually, it was thought for long that the backpropagation algorithm wasn't biologically plausible because it needs backwards connections. This study shows it's indeed the case and brings more biological plausibility to the Multi Layer Perceptron (just one type of artificial neural network among many).
antialias already gave excelent explanations about how artificial neural networks are abstracted from natural ones and how to simulate some behaviors. I just want to add that the slow connections could be (and already are) modeled by introducing unitary delays.
Another interesting thing is that there is a model of artificial neuron that uses "leaky integration". In other words, it reacts to stimuli history using a local decaying memory, exactly as the study has found.
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
Simulating self awareness and being self aware are equal; as long as the simulation is flawless. You can only ever be sure of your own consciousness anyway.
Feb 18, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
They are no more equal than an orange is to one made of antimatter. Looks the same, acts the same, but isn't the same. As for the last statement, I've said that more than once.
Evidently considering the marks I got for my comment I was wrong about us not knowing how the brain works and the mark givers must have already known what was in this article. What's more you must already know more than researchers now know so why don't you enlighten us?
Feb 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Feb 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)