Refining atmospheric climate models
The fresh scent of pine may end the search for missing sources of organic molecules in the air—which, it could well turn out, aren't missing after all. In work appearing in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Early Edition Online, researchers found that particles containing compounds such as those given off by pine trees evaporate more than 100 times slower than expected by current air-quality models
(PhysOrg.com) -- A long, frustrating search for the source of "extra" aerosols seen in field experiments but not in models might have come to an end when scientists at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Imre Consulting discovered the particles aren't what people thought. The particles are not liquids. Instead, the aerosols, known as secondary organic aerosols (SOA), are solid and evaporate more than 100 times slower than expected. What researchers previously thought takes seconds actually takes days.
"This work could resolve the discrepancy between field observations and models," said principal investigator Dr. Alla Zelenyuk, a chemist at PNNL. "The results will affect how we represent organics in climate and air quality models, and could have profound implications for the science and policy governing control of submicron particulate matter levels in the atmosphere."
In predicting the impact of different scenarios on the planet's climate, atmospheric scientists want to use the most accurate models possible. This study gives scientists the information they need to properly represent secondary organic aerosols in the models, more accurately reflecting what is measured in the environment.
For a couple of decades, researchers have interpreted lab and field measurements under the assumption that secondary organic aerosols are liquid droplets that evaporate quickly, to establish equilibrium with their surroundings, which is central to the way these particles are modeled. Secondary organic aerosols are tiny particles of chemically modified organic compounds floating in the air. They absorb, scatter or reflect sunlight, and serve as cloud nuclei, making them an important component of the atmosphere. However, researchers have failed to explain the high amounts observed in real-world measurements.
So, researchers at PNNL and Imre Consulting used equipment that could study the particles under realistic conditions. Zelenyuk developed a sensitive and high-precision instrument called SPLAT II that can determine the composition, count, size, and measure the evaporation characteristics of these particles at room temperature. The instrument is located in EMSL.
To establish their methodology the researchers made particles from other, well-understood organic molecules that are known to form solids or liquid droplets, such as one called DOP and demonstrated that they behaved precisely as expected.
They then created secondary organic particles in the lab by oxidizing alpha-pinene, the molecule that makes pine trees smell like pine. Oxidation of this and similar volatile organic compounds is what happens in the atmosphere and results in formation of secondary organic aerosols.
Monitoring the various particles with SPLAT II for up to 24 hours, the research team found that while DOP particles behaved as expected, the pinene-based particles did not. About 50 percent of their volume evaporated away within the first 100 minutes. Then it slowed. Only another 25 percent of their volume dissipated in the next 23 hours. In addition, this fast-slow evaporation occurred similarly whether the particle was big or small, indicating the particles were not behaving like a liquid.
In the world, the secondary organic aerosols from pinene are formed in the presence of many other organic molecules, and some of these molecules slam into the particle and get incorporated, forming coatings. Experiments with the co-mingled secondary organic aerosol precursors and other organic compounds showed the researchers that these coated particles evaporate even slower than single-source secondary organic aerosols.
This lack of evaporation could put to the rest an intense effort by many scientists focused on finding other sources of atmospheric organics. "Our findings indicate that there may, in fact, be no missing SOA," said Zelenyuk.
The team then tested how close to reality their lab-based secondary organic aerosols were. By sampling the ambient air in Sacramento, Calif., they found the behavior of atmospheric secondary organic aerosols (whether from trees and shrubs or anthropogenic pollution) paralleled that of the co-mingled pinene-derived aerosols in the lab and did not behave like liquids.
The results suggest that in the real atmosphere, secondary organic aerosols evaporation is so slow that scientists do not need to include the evaporation in models. The researchers believe that incorporating this information into atmospheric models will improve the understanding of aerosols' role in the climate.
The scientists are continuing their research into measuring the properties of secondary organic aerosols and working with modelers on properly representing the aerosols' properties and their impact on the environment and atmospheric models.
More information: Vaden TD, et al. 2011. "On the Evaporation Kinetics and Phase of Laboratory and Ambient Secondary Organic Aerosol." Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, Early Edition. Online the week of January 24, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013391108
Provided by
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
30 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
-
determining time frame for most recent geological layers
May 17, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
12 hours ago |
4.6 / 5 (18) |
0
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
12 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
12 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
12 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
0
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Feb 01, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (11)
The Gipper was brilliant!
Feb 01, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (11)
Trees and plants emit up to 30 per cent of the world's methane, Frank Keppler at the Max Plank Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg, Germany, and his colleagues claim. After discovering that fallen leaves, or plant litter, produced methane, Keppler investigated whether living plants also produce this highly reduced gas in air - an oxygen rich environment. He calculated that plants give off between 60 and 240 million tonnes of methane per year.
The news has shocked the atmospheric science community."
ht_Delete_tp://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2006/January/12010601.asp
Feb 01, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
"In 2006, geochemist Frank Keppler of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz, Germany, reported that trees emit large quantities of methane, which is over 20 times more potent a greenhouse gas than the carbon dioxide that the trees soak up. Now a study by botanist Tom Dueck and his colleagues at Plant Research International in Wageningen, the Netherlands, found that methane emissions from plants were down in the noise, that the concentrations were so low and variable that they did not significantly differ from zero.'"
In reality, Keppler had never claimed the methane emissions from trees were any real problem. The emissions were large in absolute terms, but only a small fraction of the amount of CO2 sequestered sequestered by the tree, degrading the benefit of the tree by only 4% at most."
An academic quarrel followed between Keppler and Deuck over methodology.
Feb 01, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
And exactly where, in the article, does the quote you were kind enough to highlight appear? I can't find it...
Feb 01, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
https COLON SLASH SLASH //www DOT scientificamerican DOT com/article.cfm?id=are-plants-really-villains-in-climate-change
Google "Keppler Dueck trees methane" and a pile of links pop up, including this one.
Feb 01, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
http COLON SLASH SLASH www DOT pages DOT pomona DOT edu/~cjt04747/chem106ps/Scientific American Feb 2007 DOT pdf
It is actually abivalent in some ways, but it does state: " ... our calculations show that the climatic benefits gained by establishing new forests to absorb carbon dioxide would far exceed the relatively small negative effect of adding more methane to the atmosphere (which may reduce the overall carbon uptake of the trees by 4 percent at most)."
Feb 01, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Feb 02, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Yes, plants produce methane.
Feb 02, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
"The emissions were large in absolute terms"
Yup. Not to be ignored.
Feb 02, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
But it looks like there are at least 3 million.
And if the Ocean is acidifying, it is the volcanoes since no freshwater lakes are acidifying (since there aren't 3 million volcanoes in any lake)
ht_delete_tp://www.suite101.com/content/acid-oceans-due-undersea-volcanoes-not-humans-a220085
Feb 02, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
NotParker's source also provides us with the following nugget of Scientifically Illiterate Quackery...
"We are forever being told that the sun is a vast gas ball of hydrogen and helium at the center of our solar system. But new evidence may help prove this isn’t the case after all..." - John O'Sullivan - Jan 03, 2011
"The four key points made by the iron core theorists are:
1. We do not “see” the Sun;
2. We see waste products emitting light when they reach the top of the Sun's atmosphere (photosphere);
3. The "smoke" we see is (H and He) from a neutron star;
4. The global eruption was triggered by the tiny, energetic, dense neutron-rich core of the Sun or by the iron-rich mantle that surrounds it." - John O'Sullivan - Jan 03, 2011
Feb 02, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
But the 25 gigatonnes of human CO2 emissions per year can be ignored, right? Even though they are a fraction of natural emission processes.
Feb 02, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Actually, it was from a peer reviewed paper still considered valid in 2011. Look it up.
Try telling better lies. Your current crop is pathetic.
Feb 02, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Feb 03, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Being able to read and find papers on the internet is not a tough skill to learn. You should try it instead of just regurgitating Al Gore's lies.
Feb 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Feb 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Care to tell me which one I've parrotted or are you just listening to the media rather than the science?