Long and narrow, free of defects, and soluble: graphene nanoribbons by bottom-up synthesis

February 8, 2011

Long and narrow, free of defects, and soluble: graphene nanoribbons by bottom-up synthesis

Enlarge

(PhysOrg.com) -- Electronic components based on graphene could render our current silicon-based electronics obsolete. Graphene, a more recently discovered form of carbon, consists of two-dimensional sheets of aromatic six-membered carbon rings in a honeycomb arrangement. In contrast to extended graphene layers, narrow graphene nanoribbons have semiconducting properties and could thus be candidates for electronic applications.

Klaus Müllen and a team from the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research in Mainz have now introduced a new method for the synthesis of long, narrow graphene ribbons with defined dimensions in the journal Angewandte Chemie.

Previously, graphene ribbons were mainly cut out of larger graphene sheets or were obtained by slitting open carbon nanotubes lengthwise. However, with these methods it is impossible to produce ribbons that have a precisely established ratio of width to length as well as defined edges. These details are important because they determine the electronic properties of the ribbons. The search has thus been on for a method that allows controlled production of very narrow graphene ribbons—an extremely difficult challenge. The German researchers working with Müllen are now well on the way to overcome it. They are not starting with large structures to cut up (top-down); instead they are building their ribbons from smaller components (bottom-up).

The building blocks selected by Müllen and his team are long chains of aromatic six-membered carbon rings called polyphenlyenes. In contrast to previous approaches, they did not produce straight chains; instead they made them with a flexible, zigzagging, bent backbone. Furthermore, they attached hydrocarbon side-chains to the backbone to increase the solubility in organic solvents, which allows the compounds to be synthesized and processed in solution.

The next step is a reaction that splits off hydrogen (dehydrogenation). This causes a ring-closing reaction in each pointy tip of the zigzag, forming a new aromatic six-membered ring that shares a side with three neighboring rings—the chain transforms in to a narrow ribbon.

In this way, the team was able to produce a series of different nanoribbons with lengths reaching over 40 nm. The width of the ribbon was defined by the size of the “points” of the polyphenylene precursor. The resulting ribbons are free of defects and soluble in common organic solvents.

“We have been the first to demonstrate that structural perfection can be achieved by the classical bottom-up synthesis of defined ,” says Müllen. “The solubility of the is an important requirement for the large-scale production of .”

More information: Klaus Müllen, Graphene Nanoribbons by Chemists: Nanometer-Sized, Soluble, and Defect-Free, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Permalink to the article: http://dx.doi.org/ … ie.201006593

Provided by Wiley search and more info website

3.8 /5 (4 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

nuge
Feb 08, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Would someone please clarify something for me: is graphene actually a sheet of benzene rings bonded together at each of the corners, or what? This makes me wonder if you could make a similar structure to buckyballs or nanotubes with Benzene rings.
PinkElephant
Feb 08, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
@nuge,

You can think of it as a sheet of benzene rings, except the classical definition of a benzene ring is a hexagon of C with H atoms at each corner. In graphene, there is no H, only pure C. And it's just one continuous sheet of C. You can visually parse it into "rings", but there are no distinct rings in the sheet (each C atom belongs equally to 3 adjacent "rings".) The chemistry is a bit different, because of this: the different affinity of valence electrons toward C vs. H in benzene, compared to uniform and symmetric affinity in a pure-C sheet.

Similar to buckyballs and nanotubes, a graphene sheet is just one big holistic macromolecule. You can parse it into a collection of hexagonal rings, just like you can parse a buckyball into a bunch of hexagons and pentagons. But in the end, it's a single entity, and its electronic properties derive from its integrated structure (rather than any artificially delineated substructure.)
nuge
Feb 08, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Ah, righto. Thanks PinkElephant. So there are delocalised electrons in the middle of the rings?
PinkElephant
Feb 08, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
So there are delocalised electrons in the middle of the rings?
Well... sort of. Firstly, they aren't actually in the middle of the rings (nor would they be in benzene.) Delocalized electrons are simply free to skip from one atom to another immediately neighboring one.

So in graphene, on average at any given instant 3 of the 4 valence electrons on each C atom are binding it covalently to its 3 neighboring C atoms, while the 4th electron is randomly migrating through the molecule.
nuge
Feb 08, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Thanks, you've been very helpful. One more question though - is the delocalised electron the reason for the high conductivity of graphene? And how good is the conductivity anyway, compared to metals like Gold?
PinkElephant
Feb 08, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Yes, the delocalized electron is responsible for the high conductivity. Or to put it more accurately, the pool of loosely bound electrons is responsible.

Though as opposed to metals, in graphene, due to the structure of the molecule, electrons can only migrate along the 2D plane of the graphene sheet (they cannot easily jump from sheet to sheet in bulk graphite.) So conductivity really depends on how well-aligned the electric field is with the graphene sheet's plane. It also depends on orientation of the sheet: current travels easier in some directions than in others along the sheet, due to how the bond axes align with the electric field.

The conductivity of isolated graphene is excellent. At room temperature it can be more conductive than any metal, when it is suspended in vacuum. However, when laid against a substrate, at room temperature the thermal vibration modes induced by the substrate can reduce carrier mobility significantly; by how much depends on the substrate.
yoatmon
Feb 09, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
On the nano scale, exact measurements have proven that the tensile strength of graphene is 217x that of steel. Its conductivity is 100 times higher than that of copper. Sequential conductivity ratings for:
1) Graphene = 5700
2) Silver = 66.5
3) Copper soft / hard = 57 / 56
4) Aluminum = 35
5) Brass = 15 - 19
Values are derived x = 1 : specific resistance.
yoatmon
Feb 09, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Oops I missed Gold. =s 45 and is somewhere between copper and aluminum. An almost unequalled property of gold is its resistance to oxidize.
yoatmon
Feb 09, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Though as opposed to metals, in graphene, due to the structure of the molecule, electrons can only migrate along the 2D plane of the graphene sheet (they cannot easily jump from sheet to sheet in bulk graphite).

Researchers at MIT were the first to successfully grow multiwalled CNTs on a graphene sheet. This enables the electrons to move just as easily in the 3rd dimension as in the other two within one plane.
antialias
Feb 09, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Researchers at MIT were the first to successfully grow multiwalled CNTs on a graphene sheet. This enables the electrons to move just as easily in the 3rd dimension as in the other two within one plane.

A surface (albeit a toridal one in the case of a CNT) is still topologically a 2D surface.
yoatmon
Feb 09, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
A surface (albeit a toridal one in the case of a CNT) is still topologically a 2D surface.

That may well be; it doesn't make my statement less viable.
kcameron
Feb 09, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
yoatmon, Where are you getting the 100x copper conductivity number? In my searches, I've only found values that show marginally better bulk conductivity than copper. The 100x numbers are for current carrying capacity which is not the same thing. High current carrying capacity is a useful property for nano-scale circuit interconnects since it avoids failures due to electro-migration.

100X copper conductivity would revolutionize many fields; especially electric motors and inductors. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like it's feasible.
nuge
Feb 09, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
How about superconductivity? What temperature does it superconduct at, and is that still only in the plane of the sheet? If so, that would be a pretty interesting effect.

And another thing, what is the magnetic behaviour of graphene like?
yoatmon
Feb 10, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
It should be noted that the astounding properties of graphene have been proven mainly on the nano scale. It is very difficult to maintain these properties when scaling up to the macro level but not impossible.
yoatmon, Where are you getting the 100x copper conductivity number?

Ref. to wikipedia:
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene

And another thing, what is the magnetic behaviour of graphene like?

Ref. to Berkeley News Bulletin:
//newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2010/07/29/graphene-under-strain/
StandingBear
Feb 13, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Ever seen a honeycomb with its six sided cells? Pass a plane through the comb at planarly parallel to its top surface...thats where the bees come out sports fans, the top.....and what you have is graphene, graphically. Really I am not goophin around!
kcameron
Feb 13, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
yoatman, I'd seen the wiki page before but I went back and checked it anyway. I don't see where the current carrying capacity is mentioned. The electrical conductivity numbers aren't clearly stated but the closest reference I could find is "The corresponding resistivity of the graphene sheet would be 10−6 Ω·cm". Copper resistivity is about 1.7x10-6 Ω·cm. So graphene's conductivity is about 1.7X that of copper; a far cry from 100X.

1.7X would still be pretty good. Given the greatly reduced density and ability to withstand much higher temperatures, graphene wires may someday lead to substantially improved electric motors, etc.
kcameron
Feb 13, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
yoatman, The relevant entry from the wiki page is "The corresponding resistivity of the graphene sheet would be 10−6 Ω·cm". That corresponds to conductivity of about 1.7X that of copper: a far cry from 100X.

Given graphene's greatly reduced density and ability to withstand high temperatures, it would still make for a substantial improvement to motors, etc.
kcameron
Feb 13, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
yoatman, The relevant entry from the wiki page is "The corresponding resistivity of the graphene sheet would be 10-6 ohm-cm". That corresponds to conductivity of about 1.7X that of copper: a far cry from 100X.

Given graphene's greatly reduced density and ability to withstand high temperatures, it would still make for a substantial improvement to motors, etc.
kcameron
Feb 13, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Sorry for the repeats. The web interface kept telling me that the formatting was wrong but apparently accepted the comments anyway.
nuge
Feb 13, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Apology NOT accepted.
yoatmon
Feb 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
------------------------------------------------------
"Copper resistivity is about 1.7x10-6 Ω·cm. So graphene's conductivity is about 1.7X that of copper; a far cry from 100X."
------------------------------------------------------
Check out e. g. : (http//www)
.electronicsweekly.com/Articles/2009/08/05/46677/georgia-tech-claims-100x-copper-conductivity-for-graphene-interconnect.htm
kcameron
Feb 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I had seen that electronics weekly article before. It is about current density; not conductivity. Unfortunately, the article's author also got confused about the difference.

Here's the relevant excerpt from that article:
"This makes them very robust in resisting electromigration and should greatly improve chip reliability. The current carrying capacity is at least two orders of magnitude higher than copper at these size scales"

Again: current carrying capacity != conductivity.
Rank 3.8 /5 (4 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • microstructure of titanium
    created6 hours ago
  • Steam in My Espresso Machine
    created12 hours ago
  • Density question
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Mass transport originating from a point source at a solid gas interface
    createdMay 22, 2012
  • Ammonia dispersion in Air
    createdMay 22, 2012
  • Multi Choice Help
    createdMay 21, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Materials & Chemical Engineering

More news stories

Dopant gives graphene solar cells highest efficiency yet

(Phys.org) -- By taking advantage of graphene’s favorable electrical and optical properties, and then adding an organic dopant, researchers have achieved the highest power conversion efficiency yet for ...

Nanotechnology / Nanophysics

created May 21, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (10) | comments 14 | with audio podcast feature

Nanomedicine: Quantum dots appear safe in pioneering study on primates

A pioneering study to gauge the toxicity of quantum dots in primates has found the tiny crystals to be safe over a one-year period, a hopeful outcome for doctors and scientists seeking new ways to battle diseases ...

Nanotechnology / Bio & Medicine

created May 20, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (3) | comments 8 | with audio podcast

In nanorod crystal growth, nanoparticles seen as artificial atoms

In the growth of crystals, do nanoparticles act as "artificial atoms" forming molecular-type building blocks that can assemble into complex structures? This is the contention of a major but controversial theory ...

Nanotechnology / Nanophysics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (6) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

First direct observation of oriented attachment in nanocrystal growth

Berkeley Lab researchers have reported the first direct observation of nanoparticles undergoing oriented attachment, the critical step in biomineralization and the growth of nanocrystals. A better understanding ...

Nanotechnology / Nanophysics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (3) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Synthetic nano-waste does not disappear

(Phys.org) -- Tiny particles of cerium oxide do not burn or change in the heat of a waste incineration plant. They remain intact on combustion residues or in the incineration system, as a new study by Swiss ...

Nanotechnology / Bio & Medicine

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 1 | with audio podcast


Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.