US will no longer dominate science and research

Feb 18, 2011

A shift in the global research landscape will reposition the United States as a major partner, but not the dominant leader, in science and technology research in the coming decade, according to a Penn State researcher. However, the U.S. could benefit from this research shift if it adopts a policy of knowledge sharing with the growing global community of researchers.

"What is emerging is a global science system in which the U.S. will be one player among many," said Caroline Wagner, associate professor of international affairs, who presented her findings today (Feb. 18) at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C.

The entrance of more nations into global science has changed the research landscape. From 1996 to 2008, the share of papers published by U.S. dropped 20 percent. Wagner attributes much of this output shift not to a drop in U.S. research efforts, but to the exponentially increasing research conducted in developing countries, such as China and India.

China has already surpassed the U.S. in the output of research papers in the fields of natural science and engineering. Based on current trends, China will publish more papers in all fields by 2015. Although China still lags in quality, according to Wagner, that gap is closing, too.

As enrollments in Chinese universities swell, there will also be more researchers in China than there are in the U.S., she noted.

Typical recommendations to spur U.S. research, such as spending more money on research, may not restore American preeminence in science and technology.

"Some consider America's loss in the 'numbers game' in research to be a scary scenario, but the answer may not be in spending more money," said Wagner. "The system may be operating at full capacity—and the law of diminishing returns exists in , just as it does in other sectors."

Instead of this low return-on-investment strategy, Wagner recommended that the U.S. rely on a more efficient knowledge-sharing strategy by tapping experts from other countries who have developed more knowledge and better skills than U.S. researchers in certain fields. Other nations would, in turn, have access to U.S. scientists to conduct research in fields where they are most proficient.

Wagner refers to the possibility of a global research community as the new "invisible college," a term coined in the 17th century to describe the connections among researchers from diverse disciplines and places who created the world's first scientific society.

One fallacy is that the Internet will naturally create this global research community, said Wagner. Despite the presence of global communication systems, such as the Internet and mobile phone technology, research remains a difficult network to navigate, especially for scientists in developing countries.

"The Internet helps speed up the rate of communication, but doesn't necessarily improve access for developing countries," Wagner said. "Since face-to-face contact is still the preferred way to connect with fellow researchers, participants can still be blocked by the cost of travel and access to research papers, for example."

Explore further: Can science eliminate extreme poverty?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Report: U.S. R&D publications decline

Nov 27, 2006

A science editor says the U.S. share of scientific papers published worldwide in peer-reviewed science and engineering journals is declining.

China to surpass U.S. emissions levels

Nov 07, 2006

The International Energy Agency says China will surpass the United States in carbon dioxide emissions by 2009, about a decade ahead of previous predictions.

Recommended for you

Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed

9 hours ago

Almost seven years have passed since Ontario's street-racing legislation hit the books and, according to one Western researcher, it has succeeded in putting the brakes on the number of convictions and, more importantly, injuries ...

Newlyweds, be careful what you wish for

Apr 17, 2014

A statistical analysis of the gift "fulfillments" at several hundred online wedding gift registries suggests that wedding guests are caught between a rock and a hard place when it comes to buying an appropriate gift for the ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

patnclaire
4 / 5 (4) Feb 18, 2011
I cannot use quotes or I will be filtered by phyorg. What we have here is failure to communicate. We must get our minds right.President Clinton stopped funding for the Superconducting Super Collider in Texas, thus assuring or mediocrity. Funding for our only working collider was stopped this year. He ignored Neil Armstrong about NASA. John Holdern said in April that the United States cannot expect to be number one in everything indefinitely. What more proof do we need that the fix is in? Americans are being told to stop the race and let the rest of the world lead us for a while. We have not done such a good job and so others may do it better goes the current thinking. Let the EU lead in experimental physics.
abdlzizk
not rated yet Feb 19, 2011
inkreasing The amount oF The science and researching is The solution
bluehigh
1 / 5 (1) Feb 19, 2011
The world can have all the basic research success it wants to invest in. When it comes to using the results of basic research to create usable and marketable products its USA all the way.
MarkyMark
not rated yet Feb 19, 2011
The world can have all the basic research success it wants to invest in. When it comes to using the results of basic research to create usable and marketable products its USA all the way.


Why?
Skepticus
3 / 5 (2) Feb 19, 2011
Oh well...the US will dominate ID science and research. USa is no.1 again, so no worry folks.
Paradox
5 / 5 (1) Feb 19, 2011
The world can have all the basic research success it wants to invest in. When it comes to using the results of basic research to create usable and marketable products its USA all the way.

That wont last long. I have watched the U.S. decline for many years now, in almost every way possible. Nothing lasts forever.
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Feb 19, 2011
If we didn't give everything away for free, we wouldn't be in this situation.

Don't expect everyone else to return the favor, 'cause they won't.
Beard
not rated yet Feb 19, 2011
Who cares as long as everyone benefits and the countries conducting the research are trustworthy? As long as US output and quality don't decrease; this global collaboration could stimulate new advances.
COCO
not rated yet Feb 22, 2011
trying spending a wee bit less on teaching the world the value of gunpowder - by focusing on war and bailing out banks who created their own problems you spend on the wrong things - keep it up and you will bankrupt yourselves and end up breaking up..............

More news stories

Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed

Almost seven years have passed since Ontario's street-racing legislation hit the books and, according to one Western researcher, it has succeeded in putting the brakes on the number of convictions and, more importantly, injuries ...

Researchers successfully clone adult human stem cells

(Phys.org) —An international team of researchers, led by Robert Lanza, of Advanced Cell Technology, has announced that they have performed the first successful cloning of adult human skin cells into stem ...