Geographers recreate Louisiana hurricane of 1812

February 6, 2011

( -- Nearly 200 years before Hurricane Katrina, a major storm hit the coast of Louisiana just west of New Orleans. Because the War of 1812 was simultaneously raging, the hurricane’s strength, direction and other historically significant details were quickly forgotten or never recorded.

But a University of South Carolina geographer has reconstructed the storm, using maritime records, and has uncovered new information about its intensity, how it was formed and the track it took.

Dr. Cary Mock’s account of the “Great of 1812” appears in the current issue of the Journal of the American Meteorological Society, a top journal for meteorological research.

“It was a lost event, dwarfed by history itself,” said Mock, an associate professor in the College of Arts and Sciences. “Louisiana was just in possession by the United States at the time, having been purchased from France only years before, and was isolated from the press.”

Mock says historians have long known that a hurricane hit New Orleans on Aug. 19, 1812, but they didn’t know the meteorological details about the storm.

“Hurricane Katrina is not the worst-case scenario for New Orleans, as its strongest winds were over water east of the eye,” said Mock. “The 1812 hurricane was the closest to the city, passing just to the west. It wasn’t as big as Katrina, but it was stronger at landfall, probably a mid-three or four category hurricane in terms of winds.”

Detailed information about past hurricanes is critical to helping climatologists today forecast and track hurricanes. But until recently, little was known of hurricanes that occurred before the late 19th century, when weather instrumentation and record keeping became more sophisticated and standardized. Mock’s research has shed light on much of the nation’s hurricane history that has remained hidden for centuries.

“A hurricane like the one in August 1812 would rank among the worst Louisiana hurricanes in dollar damage if it occurred today,” said Mock. “Hurricane Betsey was 100 miles to the west. Katrina was to the east. A 1915 hurricane came from the South. By knowing the track and intensity, as well as storm surge, of the August 1812 hurricane, we have another worst-case-scenario benchmark for hurricanes. If a hurricane like it happened today -- and it could happen -- it would mean absolute devastation.”

Mock has spent the last decade conducting research and creating a history of hurricanes and severe weather of the Eastern U.S. that dates back hundreds of years. Using newspapers, plantation records, diaries and ship logs, he has created a database that gives scientists the longitudinal data they’ve lacked. His research has been funded by nearly $700,000 in grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Mock began researching the August 1812 hurricane along with other early Louisiana hurricanes in 2006. It took 18 months for him to reconstruct the 1812 storm’s complete track.

Newspaper accounts, which included five from Louisiana and 17 from other states, described hourly timing of the storm’s impact, wind direction and intensity, rainfall, tide height and damage to trees and buildings.

The Orleans Gazette description of the impact of storm surge on the levees is one example:

“The levee almost entirely destroyed; the beach covered from fragments of vessels, merchandize, trunks, and here and there the eye falling on a mangled corpse. In short, what a few hours before was life and property, presented to the astonished spectator only death and ruin,” reported the newspaper.

The environmental conditions of the Louisiana coast were different in 1812; the sea level was lower, elevation of the city was higher and the expanse of the wetlands far greater. These conditions would have reduced the storm surge by at least several feet, says Mock.

Some of the most valuable sources to Mock’s research were maritime records, which include ship logbooks and ship protests, records submitted by ship captains to notaries detailing damage sustained to goods as a result of weather. Ship logs, kept hour by hour, include data about wind scale, wind direction and barometric pressure.

Because of the war, England bolstered its naval presence, providing Mock, the first academic researcher to conduct historical maritime climate research, with a bounty of records to help him recreate the storm’s path and intensity.

“The British Royal Navy enforced a blockade of American ports during the War of 1812,” said Mock. “The logbooks for ships located in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea had all sorts of valuable information.”

In addition to 12 British Navy logbooks, he was able to use information from logbooks of the USS Enterprise and another from an American merchant vessel. Ship protest records from the New Orleans Notarial Archives provided Mock with some surprising contributions.

“I was initially pretty pessimistic on what I would find in the ship protests,” said Mock. “I thought I’d find a few scraps and be in and out in two days. I was wrong. I found a trove of material and ended up going back eight times.”

Archivists presented Mock with upwards of 100 books for every year, each 800 pages in length and none indexed with the word hurricane. After scouring the records, Mock uncovered nearly 50 useful items related to the 1812 hurricane, including accounts from the schooner, Rebecca, which described the storm in the middle of the Gulf of Mexico in a protest that was filed with notary Marc Lafitte.

It described a 4 p.m. heavy gale that increased to a perfect hurricane wind, with the shifting of winds by noon the next day. The shift of winds from the northeast to the northwest told Mock that the storm track passed to the east of the Rebecca.

Using the logs and protests, Mock was able to correlate the precise location of ships with the hourly weather and create a map of the storm’s path through the Gulf of Mexico.

“Its initial approach was toward Mississippi, but then it turned northwest toward Louisiana as it approached landfall in the afternoon on Aug. 19,” Mock said. “The USS Enterprise had the most detailed wind observations at New Orleans. A change in winds to the southwest around local midnight tells me that the storm center skimmed as little as five kilometers to the west of New Orleans.”

To further understand the hurricane’s formation and dissipation, Mock reviewed records stretching as far north as Ohio and east to South Carolina. Included among them were meteorological records by James Kershaw in Camden, S.C., which are part of the collections of USC’s South Caroliniana Library.

“I wanted to collect data from a wide area to understand the weather patterns, pressure systems and the very nature of the 1812 hurricane,” said Mock. “A better understanding of hurricanes of the past for a wide area provides a better understanding of hurricane formation and their tracks in the future.”

Explore further: East Coast most likely hurricane target

More information: Mock, C.J., M. Chenoweth, I. Altamirano , M.D. Rodgers, and R. García-Herrera. The Great New Orleans Hurricane of 1812. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 91: 1653-1663.

Related Stories

East Coast most likely hurricane target

May 16, 2006

Private forecasts say the East Coast is the most likely target of five to nine hurricanes expected to hit the United States this season, reports said.

Envisat Images Hurricane Gustav

September 5, 2008

The development and path of Hurricane Gustav is shown via a sequence of satellite images acquired by Envisat's Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) instrument on 25 August, 28 August, 30 August and 1 September 2008 ...

Recommended for you

Middle atmosphere in sync with the ocean

July 26, 2016

Water plays a major role for our planet not only in its liquid form at the surface. In the atmosphere too, it considerably affects our lives as well as weather and climate. Clouds and rainfall are one example. Water vapor, ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4 / 5 (1) Feb 06, 2011
That's hard to imagine, and I live in Louisiana. I'm familliar with the stories of some of the more obscure historical storms that wiped out entire towns.

Beating Katrina at landfall is hard to do. Special K hit Lousiana, officially, allegedly, as a 125mph Category 3, but it's landfall pressure was 922mb, which is almost identical to category 5 Andrew, 919 is category 5.

So if the 1812 storm was stronger than Katrina, it should be added to the list of category 5 landfalls, putting the total to 4, with 2 having hit Louisiana (Camille).

On the integrated Kinetic Energy index, Ike at peak intensity has the current world record, and Katrina is number 2.

In order to exceed Katrina, it would be a 216Tj storm with 40ft surge in right front quadrant, Katrina was in the low 30's in Waveland, MS.

If this happened in modern times it would kill at least a few hundred thousand people...even on the north shore and greater baton rouge area, all would flood scores of miles inland.
3 / 5 (1) Feb 06, 2011
Now the SS scale classifies storms by wind, so Andrew, being a smaller than average storm as it hit Florida, had higher winds than it's pressure suggested, while Katrina, being a larger than average storm, had slightly lower winds than it's pressure at landfall suggested.

But what I'm getting at is the fact that anything they are likely to have found to classify this storm would be pressure estimates or storm tide estimates to attempt to calculated integrated kinetic energy.

In order to beat Katrina on Integrated Kinetic Energy, it has to be either ridiculously large, but average intensity like Ike, or ridiculously intense, but average size like Camille, (Katrina beat Camille's mean sea level rise by about 4 to 8 feet in most locations)...or basicly top 5 in BOTH size and intensity.

That track push the lakes into the northshore, tangi, livingston, St. John Baptist, Ascension, and east baton rouge with about 20ft to 25ft water level rise. Greater NOLA area would be erased.
4 / 5 (1) Feb 06, 2011
Yah, now that I read the PDF, i see this article was sensationalism.

The PDF admits this storm could not have been as strong as Katrina.

This kind of reporting pisses me off when they do that.

The claim that this storm was stronger than K at landfall is pure BS...

They showed absolutely no data to support that ridiculous claim, and the log books are vague at best.

People survived this thing in wooden sail boats...Katrina washed up oil rigs onto the shore, and deposited casino boat a mile inland...there is no comparison...

This hyperbole is ridiculous...

100kts is 115mph, but almost direct hit from right front eye wall.

Katrina was allegedly 125mph, but not a direct hit at all.

Based on Velocity cubed, Katrina was both larger and 28% more powerful per square meter surface.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.