Gender gap: Selection bias snubs scholarly achievements of female scientists

Feb 18, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Women scientists must confront sexism when competing for scholarly awards, according to a new analysis.

Research funded by the National Science Foundation and sponsored by the Association for in Science found that female scientists win service or teaching awards in proportion to the number of women in the PhD pool for their discipline, says Anne Lincoln at Southern Methodist University. That's not the case, however, for awards for their research, says Lincoln, one of three authors on the analysis, which was reported in Nature.

The number of women who win scholarly awards is far fewer, the authors report.

"Using data in the public domain on 13 disciplinary societies, we found that the proportion of female prizewinners in 10 of these was much lower than the proportion of female full professors in each discipline," the authors write.

Why the gap? Lincoln, an assistant professor in the SMU Sociology Department, and her co-authors point to the award selection process.

An analysis of selection practices found that selection committees carry out their duties with few guidelines, minimal oversight and little attention to conflict-of-interest issues, the authors write. The researchers' investigation found that the chances a woman will win an award for her research improve if a woman is serving on the committee. The analysis found, however, that many committees have no female members, that few have female chairs, and there are few female nominees, said the authors.

Nomination letters for women typically include personal details and contain stereotypically female adjectives, such as "cooperative" and "dependable," the authors report in the article.

"Notices soliciting nominations, by contrast, tend to use language that fosters male images, such as 'decisive' or 'confident,'" they say.

Co-authors were Stephanie H. Pincus, founder of the RAISE Project, sponsored by the Society for Women's Health Research; and biochemist Phoebe S. Leboy at the University of Pennsylvania and past president of the Association for Women in Science.

Explore further: A two generation lens: Current state policies fail to support families with young children

More information: www.nature.com/nature/journal/… 31/full/469472a.html

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Female candidates get fewer votes: Study

Nov 21, 2007

Female candidates get fewer votes, according to ANU research released today that analysed the performance of nearly 17,000 candidates who ran for the House of Representatives between 1903 and 2004.

Gender roles and not gender bias hold back women scientists

Nov 19, 2007

Traditional roles of women in the home and a negative bias in workplace support result in less career success for women versus men at the same stage of their research careers, determined researchers at the European Molecular ...

Are women voters more likely to vote for female candidates?

Mar 31, 2008

The research, conducted by University of Wisconsin’s Kathleen Dolan, examined the National Election Study (NES) data, which provided information about voters’ reactions to female candidates and whether gender affinity ...

Recommended for you

Scholar tracks the changing world of gay sexuality

16 hours ago

With same-sex marriage now legalized in 19 states and laws making it impossible to ban homosexuals from serving in the military, gay, lesbian and bisexual people are now enjoying more freedoms and rights than ever before.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

geokstr
1 / 5 (2) Feb 18, 2011
More taxpayer funded earmark money wasted by feminist "scientists" with predetermined agendas driven by leftist ideology.
Skeptic_Heretic
1 / 5 (1) Feb 19, 2011
More taxpayer funded earmark money wasted by feminist "scientists" with predetermined agendas driven by leftist ideology.

Because the above quoted comment isn't exactly what the article is referring to... /sarcasm