Flu reduction policies don't need to start at the beginning of an outbreak, study suggests

Feb 10, 2011

It might be better to implement policies to reduce the impact of a flu epidemic a few weeks after the start of an outbreak rather than straight away, according to a new study that uses mathematical models to simulate the effects of different interventions. The research is published today in the online journal PLoS Computational Biology.

When an outbreak of severe influenza or another severe disease like Sars takes hold and grows rapidly, governments consider various "social distancing" measures to limit the impact of the outbreak, such as closing schools and public places, and placing restrictions on transport. However, the economic cost and societal impact of these measures mean that it is undesirable to use them for a sustained period of time. The US pandemic plan, for instance, mentions a maximum duration of 12 weeks for many transmission-reducing interventions.

Researchers at Imperial College London and Utrecht University used mathematical models to consider the effectiveness of short-term interventions and evaluate the best policies for a range of objectives, such as minimising the peak demand for public health services or minimising the social or of containing the outbreak. They also considered different constraints, such as a limited stockpile of treatments.

According to the results, an intervention starting a few weeks into the epidemic is almost as effective at containing both the size of the epidemic and the peak number of cases below a certain target as one that starts at the beginning of the outbreak. The researchers conclude that because of the social and economic costs of imposing the policies for an extended period of time, it might be better not to implement social distancing measures straight away.

The study was co-authored by Dr Deirdre Hollingsworth, a Junior Research Fellow from the Medical Research Council Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling at Imperial College London, and Dr Don Klinkenberg, from Utrecht University in the Netherlands.

"If it is not possible to eradicate an epidemic, it is often assumed that you need to deploy all of your mitigation options as soon as possible," Dr Hollingsworth said. "But we found that waiting a few weeks is as effective at achieving key public health aims as starting interventions immediately. If you take into account the impact that those policies will have on society, it might be better to hold back at the start.

"If you can only use an intervention for a limited period of time, then it's likely that there will be a resurgence of the epidemic after the intervention is lifted. This happened in a number of American cities after the 1918 pandemic. Waiting a few weeks before starting to implement containment policies can reduce this resurgence," added Dr Hollingsworth.

The study also found that the best policy strategy depended on the precise objectives to be achieved. In order to limit the peak prevalence of illness, weak interventions starting early are required. In order to minimise the total size of the epidemic, stronger measures are required but they can start later.

Dr Klinkenberg said: "National plans for dealing with pandemics set out various policy options, but there is rarely any clear statement of their objectives. Different objectives can conflict with each other, so it's vital to set out your priorities.

"Epidemics are dynamic. If you intervene in an epidemic, you change the dynamics, and the effect might not be intuitive. This is why it's important to use mathematical models to simulate the effects of different policies."

Professor Sir Roy Anderson, Chair in Infectious Disease Epidemiology at Imperial College
London, and a senior author on the study, said: "Simple models of epidemics can exhibit
complex behaviours and it is important to understand these dynamic patterns when
designing optimal control policies. This is especially the case for influenza A epidemics that
move on a fast time scale of weeks and months as opposed to years".

Explore further: Second western Minnesota turkey farm hit by bird flu outbreak

More information: T.D. Hollingsworth et al. "Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza A: balancing conflicting policy objectives" PLoS Computational Biology, 10 February 2011. www.ploscompbiol.org/doi/pcbi.1001076

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Social separation stops flu spread, but must be started soon

Apr 30, 2009

A disease spread simulation has emphasized that flu interventions must be imposed quickly, if they are to be effective. Researchers writing in the open access journal BMC Public Health have shown that staying at home, closin ...

Boys will infect boys, swine flu study shows

Jan 31, 2011

Boys predominantly pass on flu to other boys and girls to girls, according to a new study of how swine flu spread in a primary school during the 2009 pandemic, published today in the journal Proceedings of the National Ac ...

Pitt receives grant to create virtual models for epidemics

Jul 31, 2009

As the world prepares for a probable resurgence of H1N1 in the coming months, University of Pittsburgh researchers are controlling the spread of infectious diseases virtually with a $13.4 million National Institutes of Health ...

New study tracks the spread of bird flu between farms

Apr 04, 2007

A new way of understanding how highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) spreads among farm birds is published today in PLoS ONE. The study could help analyse the success of different control measures in the event of future ...

Recommended for you

Nocturnal GERD tied to non-infectious rhinitis

6 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) appears to be a risk factor for non-infectious rhinitis (NIR), according to a study published online March 24 in Allergy.

COPD takes big toll on employment, mobility in US

10 hours ago

(HealthDay)—The respiratory illness known as COPD takes a toll on mobility and employment, with a new report finding that nearly one-quarter of Americans with the condition are unable to work.

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.