Asia faces climate-induced migration 'crisis'
February 6, 2011 by Martin Abbugao
Pakistanis displaced by floods line up for water at a makeshift tent camp on the outskirts of Karachi, in September 2010. Asia must prepare for millions of people to flee their homes to safer havens within countries and across borders as weather patterns become more extreme, the Asian Development Bank warns.
Asia must prepare for millions of people to flee their homes to safer havens within countries and across borders as weather patterns become more extreme, the Asian Development Bank warns.
A draft of an ADB report obtained by AFP over the weekend and confirmed by bank officials cautioned that failure to make preparations now for vast movements of people could lead to "humanitarian crises" in the coming decades.
Governments are currently focused on mitigating climate change blamed for the weather changes, but the report said they should start laying down policies and mechanisms to deal with the projected population shifts.
"What is clear is that Asia and the Pacific will be amongst the global regions most affected by the impacts of climate change," said the report entitled "Climate Change and Migration in Asia and the Pacific".
"Such impacts include significant temperature increases, changing rainfall patterns, greater monsoon variability, sea-level rise, floods and more intense tropical cyclones," it said.
An aerial photo taken on February 3, shows the aftermath of Cyclone Yasi at the Hinchinbrook Marina, Australia. Asia must prepare for millions of people to flee their homes to safer havens within countries and across borders as weather patterns become more extreme, the Asian Development Bank warns.
The report, expected to be released in the next few weeks, comes as flooding overwhelms parts of Asia-Pacific, most recently in Australia, where a powerful cyclone worsened the impact of weeks of record inundations."Asia and the Pacific is particularly vulnerable because of its high degree of exposure to environmental risks and high population density. As a result, it could experience population displacements of unprecedented scale in the next decades," said the report, primarily targeted at regional policymakers.
Research carried out for the United Nations showed that 2010 was one of the worst years on record worldwide for natural disasters.
Asians accounted for 89 percent of the 207 million people affected by disasters globally last year, according to the Belgium-based Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED).
Summer floods and landslides in China caused an estimated $18 billion dollars in damage, while floods in Pakistan cost $9.5 billion dollars, CRED's annual study showed. Not to mention the catastrophic human cost.
"Governments are not prepared and that is why ADB is conducting this project," said Bart Edes, director of the Manila-based lending institution's poverty reduction, gender and social development division.
"There is no international cooperation mechanism established to manage climate-induced migration. Protection and assistance schemes to help manage that flow is opaque, poorly coordinated and scattered," he told AFP.
"Policymakers need to take action now," he stressed, noting that negotiating treaties and efforts to raise funds takes time.
This photo, taken in August 2010, shows an aerial view of Zhouqu county after a deadly flood-triggered landslide in northwest China's Gansu province. Summer floods and landslides in China last year caused an estimated $18 billion dollars in damage.
Last year's natural disasters in the Asia-Pacific, including millions of people displaced in Sri Lanka and the Philippines, "give us a flavour of what to expect in the future", said Edes."Migration in general is not being properly addressed and the situation is going be made worse," added Edes, referring to the additional impact of climate change on migration patterns, fuelled by economic needs and armed conflicts.
"Now we have another driver of migration."
The draft ADB report said the people forced to leave due to the extreme weather changes "have come to incarnate the human face of climate change" and while many of them will return home, many will be displaced permanently.
Those expected to suffer the most will be the poor as they lack the means to easily pack up and leave for safer havens, the report said.
"The issue of climate-induced migration will grow in magnitude and will take different forms," the report added, urging national governments and the global community to "urgently address this issue in a proactive manner."
"Failure to do so could result in humanitarian crises with great social and economic costs," it warned.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
30 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Delphi gasoline-injection engine technique rivals hybrid's edge,
37 comments
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
-
determining time frame for most recent geological layers
May 17, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
11 hours ago |
4.6 / 5 (15) |
0
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
11 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
11 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
11 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
0
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...


Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (14)
Uh huh, wanna bet?
wunderground.com/hurricane/deadlyworld.asp
Only 11 of the 31 most deadly cyclones in world history happened in the past 110 years. By the time you figure most of the world population increase(75%) occured in the past 110 years, this number 11 is almost certainly statistically below average of what you would expect for massive loss of life, given the other 21 storms and their locations. Particularly since many of the most deadly storms hit the exact same areas over and over...which makes you wonder how they repopulated that fast only to be killed again...
These data prove the Bay of Bengal has never been a safe region for human habitation. After seeing those statistics going back 426 years, only a lunatic would choose to live there...
AGW alarmists are morons.
Read a history book. This stuff is nothing new.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (14)
You would expect death tolls in the 1700s to be half the 1800s, and in the 1600s to be half the 1700s, if no GW happened at all...yet 6 of the ten worst (numbers 2 through 7,) happened before 1900.
Statistically, all 30 of the worst should be since 1900, even if no GW happened. Modern meteorology, and later satellites, have helped alleviate much of these death tolls.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (14)
Anyone want to take numbers?
Katrina, Wilma, Rita, Dennis, Emily...
Right there might get to a million or more in US, Mexico and the Caribbean...maybe 2 or 3 million...
Little or no satellite warning, nobody boards up, nobody leaves town...NOLA floods and kills 500k in one day, not counting Slidell,LA and Mississippi towns and the surrounding regions...Heck special K might have killed over a million without satellites and television...people would have just woke up that morning with 15ft of water in their house...well, actually they wouldn't have woke up...
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (15)
Droughts at least can be prevented through modern technological means through desalination and irrigation.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (8)
How "deadly" these events is is largely a matter of where they hit, and the nature and preparedness of the areas they hit. This measure is way too fuzzy to indicate correlations with climate change. More interesting are the fairly consistent observations like this:
"Atlantic tropical cyclones are getting stronger on average, with a 30-year trend that has been related to an increase in ocean temperatures over the Atlantic Ocean and elsewhere" [The increasing intensity of the strongest tropical cyclones, James B. Elsner et al, Nature 455, 92-95 (4 September 2008)]
There are easy to find papers in reputable peer-reviewed journals that show trends such as a 70% increase increase in the total amount of energy dissipated by cyclones etc. over the past few decades.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (11)
We can classify a category five storm within about an hour of it reaching 156 sustained, through microwave, radar, infrared, visible, and endless lines of buoys and UAVs.
the zeros was the most active cat 5 decade, with 25 percent of all cat 5 on record.
the 1960's was the second most active with ~19 percent of all cat 5 on record...yet world population was half, and world energy consumption was 1/3rd what it is now, and they hadn't experienced the alleged cumulative "Keeling curve" warming of the 70s, 80s, or 90s which supposedly contributed to the "evil" zeros...explain that one...
Before 1924, there were probably countless cat 5, just nobody would know the diffrence between 155mph and 170mph anyway, as either storm would annihilate almost anything built then anyway.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (12)
100 years ago people didn't have that. A storm hit, killed everybody, and then within a few generations everyone except the historians forgot it even happened. About the only thing remembered is, "There was a badass storm that killed everybody on such and such a day/year. Yup, that was the day we lost a whole territory/province;" particularly in places like the Bay of Bengal...
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (12)
http
://m.timesofindia.com/india/Huge-spike-in-illegal-Indian-traffic-to-US-via-Mexico/articleshow/7440241.cms
-Strange influx of Sikhs to the US across the mex border illegally. Just one of many examples. This is happening all over the globe as excess peoples flee north.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (11)
So this is well above the long term average for what is RECORDED, but again, records are biased by the satellite and radar era.
The 40's and 60's also had a high number of cat 4 storms with 8 each. The long term average is 6 per decade. No satellite before Camille
The 50's had 9 category 4 storms...that we know of...no satellite
The 20's had 7...that we know of...no satellites or radar.
See how false the AGW claims are? They probably had just as many storms as we have, they just didn't detect them all because some were at sea. Probably as many as 1 or 2 hurricanes per year would have gone un-noticed before the satellite era. Of these, 1 or 2 per decade might have been a category 4 or 5 at some point...
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (11)
The three strongest landfalling atlantic systems are, in this order:
Labor Day 1935 (lf 892mb...30mb below Katrina)
Gilbert 1988 900mb ( 2mb below K peak intensity)
Camille 1969 905mb
Note that Labor Day and Gilbert landfell as more intense than Katrina ever became. Note that Labor Day landfell almost as strong Wilma's peak intensity over open water.
Note that Camille landfell more intense than any storm ever became over open water, except six storms, including labor day and gilbert.
The strongest landfall on record was 75 years ago, and the third strongest landfall on record was 41 years ago...
What we can take from this is the fact that there is no correlation between the Keeling Curve and the number of hurricanes nor their landfall intensity.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (10)
Oh wow, I bet they didn't think of checking that (not). If you want to write a paper disputing the large body of evidence, then probably best to go to a climate science journal, not a comments sections of a news site, eh?
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (11)
Actually, they do, but they "conveniently" rarely, if ever, mention such things in their "findings", that is, unless you directly confront them about it.
The other thing this article conveniently doesn't mention is the fact that hurricane experts actually predict, as did I, that global warming would actually DECREASE the number of hurricanes, due to increased wind shear and certain thermodynamic issues.
While it's popular for "climate change" alarmists to blame bad hurricanes on GW, anyone who has read a few leading papers on thermodynamics and hurricane intensity and how this works, knows that GW would in no way increase the average power of hurricanes. It may even decrease the average power. The increased shear would destroy many storms or weaken them more than average.
Try learning something from someone who doesn't have an agenda.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (10)
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (11)
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (12)
Sorry, I don't subscribe to the incredible theory that all of the climate scientists, science institutions and political parties in the developed the world have miraculously joined together to form one massive global conspiracy. That is simply ridiculous tin foil hat stuff.
"anyone who has read a few leading papers on thermodynamics and hurricane intensity and how this works, knows that GW would in no way increase the average power of hurricanes"
The actual real climate scientists disagree with you there, sorry. As a PhD holding physicist myself, I tend to side with them . The fact that you try to lay down you argument here instead of a peer-reviewed climate science journal tells me that you wouldn't possibly want your your scrapbook of factoids cobbled together from shady websites and a vast array of apocrypha from ever reaching the scrutiny of those scientists with any expertise in this field.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
My data came from well established public domain, such as the actual facts from the NHC, wikipedia, and leading weather sites.
If you like, you can try contacting someone like Dr. Jeff Masters or Dr. Kerry Emanuel or even Steve Lyons, because last I heard, which was about 6 months ago, the consensus between them was that if GW is real, it would most certainly cause increased wind shear, which would decrease the number of hurricanes.
Hurricanes intensity is based off the DIFFERENCE between surface temperature and cloud tops, which means that if the ATMOSPHERE heats up, the maximum potential intensity of hurricanes goes DOWN, not up. The maximum intensity is limited by how cold the top of the troposphere gets even much more so than surface temperatures.
You can find the formula here:
wind.mit.edu/~emanuel/holem/holem.html
Save link. The site is a bit buggy when you are trying to back up...make sure you read it all and check the figures.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
The tropopause is at minus 100 celsius.
But a greenhouse effect traps heat in the ATMOSPHERE from the top down, like in a...yeah...greenhouse... and NOT from the "surface up".
So GW would actually tend to heat upper layers of the troposphere more than the surface layers or oceans, both because heat rises anyway, and because greenhouse effect is in the air, not the water, and because it's far easier to heat -100C air than it is to heat +28C water anyway, specific heat capacity being 4 times smaller and all...
So basicly your peak intensities go down significantly when atmospheric (upper troposphere) temperatures go up.
Sorry, this is the leading expert's data. Hell, he even programmed some of the models the NHC uses...
Learn something new every day, maybe
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
It was because the upper troposphere was COLDER than average, combined with ridiculously low shear, which made the "cold reservoir" much more efficient as the storm was forming.
When you look at infrared, the brighter the clouds the COLDER they are, which means they are either higher up, or the atmosphere itself is just colder, which happens. With Wilma, it so happened to be that the surface low hit this anomaly under all the right conditions, and it exploded in power.
It would be like comparing a liquid CO2 refrigerant vs water cooling or something. When it hit these abnormally cold troposphere, it went nuts.
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (11)
Drop the strawman about frequency. At no stage did I say that the number of hurricanes increased, and nor does the article for that matter. It says "more intense tropical cyclones" which agrees with every peer-reviewed climate journal paper I have read on the topic (even Emanuel's).
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (9)
Yeah, sure, because people flock to comments sections to learn science (or factoid/pseudo-science in this case).
Feb 06, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (11)
You do realize your the one "coming out in force". You have 13 posts on this story in the last 10 hours. There are only 5 posts, not including this one, that aren't yours.
Feb 07, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (5)
real world answer.photos are via Google Earth.
Feb 07, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (8)
QC, I hope you are young enough to live long enough to see how wrong you are, which will be in about 30 years considering how sadly misinformed you are. Your facts may be right but your conclusions aren't.
Truly intelligent people already know the truth. We are overpopulated by about 5 billion people for long term survival of the race. The title of this article is almost correct but it isn't climate, that is just a symptom. Overpopulation is going to be the cause and will cause migration due to lack of food, drought, rising sea level and climate change. All brought about by there being too many people for the ecosystem to handle. Want to see the future as it will be and as it could be? Compare Haiti to the Dominican Republic for a rough analogy. They occupy 2 halves of the same island. Haiti has denuded their half due to overpopulation and caused all the problems the planets overpopulation will cause eventually.
Feb 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Feb 07, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (10)
"Overpopulation" is the biggest envirowacko red-herring there is...including "climate change".
Feb 07, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (8)
Okay try the following sources. Just google the phrases I give you and take the first real link (not the google link to another search for scholarly articles):
The first is from Florida State University. Note 2010 is a record low since satellite records began:
Global Tropical Cyclone Activity Dr. Ryan N. Maue
This one is from MIT, but it is a little dated and does not have data from the past 3 years. Note the conclusion that the data and models do not show enough evidence to draw any statistically significant conclusions:
Anthropogenic Effects on Tropical Cyclone Activity
Finally, this page from NOAA shows conflicting results, but with a slight leaning towards an increase in storms. Once again, they find that more study is needed:
Global Warming and Hurricanes An Overview of Current Research Results
Hard to draw conclusions.
Feb 07, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (6)
Feb 07, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (4)
Feb 07, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
This comment is so ignorant it doesn't even merit a rebuttal. Do you live under a rock? Probably not, you would have noticed species disappearing even there.
Feb 08, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
Dr. Kerry Emanuel wrote the book on hurricane intensity, and the intensity models...
The reason I had more posts is because I needed more space to write in because I used FACTS, including links to real experts peer reviewed papers, instead of the bullshit comments other people made.
It is a fact that hurricanes require COLDER cloud tops to intensify. Warming the upper troposphere, which is what GW would do, will WEAKEN hurricanes.
If we were seeing a Wilma or a "Labor Day" every year you people would have an argument.
There has been one t-7.5 in the Atlantic since Wilma, and no t-8 since Wilma. The last t-8 before 2005 was Gilbert, and there have never been any other t-8 hurricanes in the atlantic on record, based on pressure. Though pressure estimates based on dvorak technique can be off by a margin of plus or minus ten to fifteen millibars...
Feb 08, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
You're right about the species disappearing, I did not consider this in my original comment.
However population is a function of technology, that was the main point I was making.
Feb 08, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
Wilma made landfall as a t-6.5, category 4 hurricane. However, the labor day hurricane and Camille made landfall as a t7.5, while Andrew, Felix, and Dean made landfalls as t-7.0 storms..."barely" category 5...However the info on Labor Day is spliting hairs, because that pressure was only missing t-8 by 2 millibars...on land...so it may have been stronger over water...
There are 7 t-7.5 on record in the atlantic, and half of them happened at least 30 years ago: 31, 42, 76 years.
Feb 08, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (5)
And you may be right on a technical level but I am talking about long term survival of our species with a quality of life that is better than a hive civilization. To have as many people as we have now means crowding out almost every other species that we don't derive a direct benefit from, and that isn't many. Let alone 10 billion or more like the idiot economists say we can do. We were given a paradise. What's more I believe we CAN"T survive without most of the current species diversity. Call it Gaia, call it mother nature, I just know deep down that we won't outlive other species for very long if we destroy them all.
Feb 08, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (8)
I don't agree with that at all. That's just rediculous fearmongering, and I challenge you to support it with any kind of evidence. You are letting your emotions override reason and evidence to the contrary. It was once feared that the Gray Wolf and Mountain Lion would both be driven to extinction by human expansion. Unfortunately, the wolf is so numerous now that they are spreading into new areas and mixing with urban areas that have never been part of their range. Mountian lions repopulated unbeknownst to wildlife experts all the way to Kansas City, and several have been photographed by traffic cams in recent years there. The DNR at first denied the claims, but they now estimate a sustainable population there. Imagine that. They didn't even know. Always be open
Feb 08, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (6)
You do realize that this has much more to do with building codes than with storm intensity, right?
If you don't think so, compare the Chilean quake with the Haitian quake and tell me why Haiti had many magnitudes more casualties.
Basically, you're comparing infant mortality from the 1600's to infant mortality today and assuming that since the population is larger, more children should die at birth. No where do you take into account any of the technological and social advances that specifically counteract the deathtoll of natural events.
Feb 08, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Actually, he's wrong about that, too. The disappearances are almost entirely within "Ecologists'" computer models.
The current population of Earth could be entirely housed in families/groups of 4 on 4300 sq' lots in Texas.
IAC, the most accurate UN Population Projection tool, the lowest edge of the lowest band of their models, indicates pop. will peak at under 8Bn by 2030. And then decline slowly.
overpopulationisamyth.com/overpopulation-the-making-of-a-myth#FAQ1
Oops!
Feb 08, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
Feb 08, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
Feb 09, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Ah, now I see where you are coming from. You are one of those people who think anything humans do is bad, and that if something is ugly or smells bad, then it's bad for this concept you call 'nature', which is seperate and opposed to 'humanity'. You made several wild claims in your post. In stead of arguing with you, I will simply say that you have an extreme view of things and that you are way outside the mainstream scientific view and public opinion. I will politely disagree with your view, and you can continue to believe what makes you feel better. I would suggest that you go for a drive in the mountains sometime though, or take a boat out of view of the coast and look around. Walk the Appallacian trail sometime. Open mind
Feb 09, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Feb 09, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
We are coming closer and closer to destroying the chain of life in the ocean. If it dies, we will follow sooner or later. All it will take is killing the plankton. The Plankton are the foundation of oceanic life, if it dies so does everything else. That is the chain of life and it is similar on land except that there is more than one foundation. You may think we can treat the ocean as humanities personal toilet, I don't.
Feb 10, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Really? Do you seriously believe this nonsense? That is totally absurd. Destroying the chain of life in the oceans? You don't have a clue what you are talking about. Are you a member of PETA, by chance? It's possible that we are actually increasing the strength of the base of the ocean food chain. There isn't any accurate way to measure it, so your claims are as baseless as the one I just made.
You say it makes you sad. I say it makes you feel good to be sad. I happen to like movies that make me cry. It's the same thing.
Feb 11, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Oh come on. Weak argument from the Denier class.