Ancient catastrophic drought leads to question: How severe can climate change become?
A boat on Lake Tanganyika today; the lake's ancient surface water level fell dramatically. Credit: Curt Stager
How severe can climate change become in a warming world? Worse than anything we've seen in written history, according to results of a study appearing this week in the journal Science.
An international team of scientists led by Curt Stager of Paul Smith's College, New York, has compiled four dozen paleoclimate records from sediment cores in Lake Tanganyika and other locations in Africa.
The records show that one of the most widespread and intense droughts of the last 50,000 years or more struck Africa and Southern Asia 17,000 to 16,000 years ago.
Between 18,000 and 15,000 years ago, large amounts of ice and meltwater entered the North Atlantic Ocean, causing regional cooling but also major drought in the tropics, says Paul Filmer, program director in the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Division of Earth Sciences, which funded the research along with NSF's Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences and its Division of Ocean Sciences.
"The height of this time period coincided with one of the most extreme megadroughts of the last 50,000 years in the Afro-Asian monsoon region with potentially serious consequences for the Paleolithic humans that lived there at the time," says Filmer.
The "H1 megadrought," as it's known, was one of the most severe climate trials ever faced by anatomically modern humans.
Africa's Lake Victoria, now the world's largest tropical lake, dried out, as did Lake Tana in Ethiopia, and Lake Van in Turkey.
The Nile, Congo and other major rivers shriveled, and Asian summer monsoons weakened or failed from China to the Mediterranean, meaning the monsoon season carried little or no rainwater.
What caused the megadrought remains a mystery, but its timing suggests a link to Heinrich Event 1 (or "H1"), a massive surge of icebergs and meltwater into the North Atlantic at the close of the last ice age.
Previous studies had implicated southward drift of the tropical rain belt as a localized cause, but the broad geographic coverage in this study paints a more nuanced picture.
"If southward drift were the only cause," says Stager, lead author of the Science paper, "we'd have found evidence of wetting farther south. But the megadrought hit equatorial and southeastern Africa as well, so the rain belt didn't just move--it also weakened."
Climate models have yet to simulate the full scope of the event.
The lack of a complete explanation opens the question of whether an extreme megadrought could strike again as the world warms and de-ices further.
"There's much less ice left to collapse into the North Atlantic now," Stager says, "so I'd be surprised if it could all happen again--at least on such a huge scale."
Given what such a catastrophic megadrought could do to today's most densely populated regions of the globe, Stager hopes he's right.
Provided by
National Science Foundation
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
30 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Delphi gasoline-injection engine technique rivals hybrid's edge,
37 comments
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
-
determining time frame for most recent geological layers
May 17, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
11 hours ago |
4.6 / 5 (15) |
0
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
11 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
11 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
11 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
0
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Feb 24, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (14)
Interesting article anyway.
Feb 24, 2011
Rank: 4.9 / 5 (8)
You are probably right though. This kind of study usually gets the knees jerking pretty good.
Feb 24, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (18)
As severe as the warmists computer models can make it.
I see that the obligatory apocalyptic apologistic got here first though.
Feb 24, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (12)
Actually I have my reservations about the climate change case. But nowhere near as many as I have about you.
Feb 24, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (15)
"Warmists"? You are aware that it isn't a political party that you get to support, right? It's something called reality, as confirmed by decades of data.
Feb 24, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (15)
Feb 24, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
On the whole, the article itself seems pretty well done. Its speculations aren't presented as established facts, and it closes with kind of the opposite of the sub-title, i.e. with Curt Stager doubting that it could happen again, at least at such a scale.
I'm obviously a true blue, red-blooded, hard-core "AGW Denier". For that and other reasons have to say to GaryB that while I agree with the premise that the Earth is an ill-understood dynamic system, I disagree and think it would be crazy to tax carbon fuels more than is already being done in order to push nukes, etc. And I'm very pro-nuke.
The article, on the other hand, I'll give a thumbs-up and 4 stars.
Feb 24, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (12)
Feb 25, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Feb 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Assuming we are modelling the current climate changes, would it not be possible to also model (with less accuracy) different scenarios that could have caused the drought 16k or so years ago?
Feb 25, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
That's a good question. The short answer is both yes and no. The models probably could be set up to simulate that time period, however they way the models work is that you have to know a lot of things about the state of the atmosphere before you can model it. The atmosphere was radically different at that time period, with much lower oceans, large continental ice sheets, etc. With a large and concentrated effort, you may be able to use successive model runs to tighten constraints on some of the well-understood variables enough to figure out some of the less understood variables. The time and work required to do that, versus the confidence you would have in the results probably doesn't justify the time and money to do it right now. And of course, what would it gain us?
Feb 25, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
The big models are set up in grids. Each grid has to be pre-conditioned with a few different variables. If you don't know the values of those parameters then you are stuck. With a lot of work, you can use the model itself to make some good guesses, but you have to understand how many parameters there are and also how many grids there are. If any parameter in any grid is off by a little bit, then what is the confidence in the model results. When they model the modern world, they can check model results against the real world and then do what is called "tuning" to get the model to match up with reality. When trying to reconstruct a time period 10k years ago, you can't do very much comparrison to the real world because many of those measurements just aren't available. For example, how many places around the world have been analyzed with tree ring studies, ice cores, stalagmites, sediment cores, etc. There are just too many grid cells that wouldn't have any data.
Feb 25, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
"Hey, let's not study things because we don't understand them very well." You took two posts to say virtually that.
Feb 25, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
You read through two posts and missed his point.
Feb 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Feb 25, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
Actually, as I stated in my first post, I think this research is great. They are filling in some of the missing pieces that make it so hard to use a CGCM to simulate the climate 10k years ago. Over time, through good research like this, we can begin to fill in more and more of the missing pieces and gain a more and more complete picture of how our world works. What you said is actually opposite of my views. I was pointing out that computer models aren't the best way. Field studies like the one above are much better at this point.
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Feb 26, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
"The Polar Bears will be fine." - Freeman Dyson.
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
And I am supposed to give a rat's derriere about what reservations you have about me exactly why?
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Where's the problem? You have to take it precisely as seriously as anyone else takes you. This is not burdensome.
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (2)
That changed 100 years ago. Now we are busy populating the planet with CO2 and methane belching machines. Climate change is going to happen quicker than it ever did in the past because of us. It is no coincidence that climate change is happening now. Evidently skeptics think it is a coincidence which just goes to show how dumb they are.
Feb 27, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
What he means is the Canada bears because the pole will be nothing but bearless water.
Feb 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
There's plenty of desal plants around the world. Miami Florida gets a lot of its water that way already. I don't know the percent, but it could even be the majority of their water now. They have one of the largest single desal plants in the world. Other places have smaller ones. The real problem is money. Running a desal plant is expensive, so a wealthy area like Florida can afford to pay extra for water, but a poor place like Somalia can't. Even if you raised UN money to build one there, you would also have to build the entire water grid because there just isn't any public infrastructure there. Then you would also have to train thousands of people with the technical skills to run and maintain it. Transporting water long distances from the coast is also a problem if you don't have money. The US will never run out of water, but poor countries are already.