Wave-generated 'white hole' boosts Hawking radiation theory: research

January 18, 2011

A team of UBC physicists and engineers have designed a experiment featuring a trough of flowing water to help bolster a 35-year-old theory proposed by eminent physicist Stephen Hawking.

In 1974, Hawking predicted that black holes--often thought of having gravitational pulls so strong that nothing escapes from them--emit a very weak level of radiation. According to the theory, pairs of photons are torn apart by a black hole's gravitational field--one photon falls into the black hole, but the other escapes as a form of radiation.

In results outlined in the latest issue of , a team of UBC researchers led by international postdoctoral researcher Silke Weinfurtner put the test to Hawking's theory by creating a 'white hole' in a six-metre-long flume of flowing water.

Placing an airplane wing-shaped obstacle in the path of the flowing water created a region of high-velocity flow which blocked surface waves, generated downstream, from traveling upstream. The obstruction simulated a white hole, the temporal reverse of a black hole.

The shallow surface waves divided into pairs of deep-water waves, analogous to the photon pairs featured in Hawking's theory. Like in , they showed that the analog would also emit a thermal spectrum of radiation.

"While this creative simulation obviously doesn't prove Hawking's theory, it does show that his ideas apply broadly," says UBC William Unruh, part of the team which included European Union Marie Curie Fellow Weinfurtner, undergraduate student Matthew Penrice, Civil Engineering post doctoral fellow Edmund Tedford, and Canada Research Chair in Environmental Fluid Mechanics Gregory Lawrence.

"This experiment also exemplifies all of the strengths of UBC's research enterprise--the involvement of students, our international outreach and connections, and a very open, collaborative way of looking at scientific questions," says Unruh.

More information: Physical Review Letters paper: http://prl.aps.org … 6/i2/e021302

Provided by University of British Columbia search and more info website

3.5 /5 (17 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

lexington
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Bitchin'
Paljor
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
We should now check with our most powerful telescopes a nearby black hole for a specific kind of radiation leaking from it. (what kind i don't know what ever kind they were talking about.)
Skeptic_Heretic
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
What the hell was this?
BillFox
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
This my friend is SCIENCE!... No not really, got to love how an article discredits itself half way through. "While this creative simulation obviously doesn't prove Hawking's theory"

Essencially they stuck a model plane wing in a bathtub, threw on some sciency words and hit publish.
Royale
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I really am not sure what they're getting at. They've painted a completely fuzzy picture in my head. Since I'm rooting for Hawking radiation, I'm glad that they didn't disprove it.
TehDog
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (2)
The linked abstract and synopsis make it a little clearer. I'm not going to try and explain it myself, but I think I get what they're saying. A couple of diagrams would have helped, took me a few minutes to visualise the setup.
Pyle
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
What the hell was this?

This was AWESOME! It is totally true! When you catch a wave and cover a subsurface impediment (rock) you totally go faster, and that is HOT!

It could only be a clearer generalization of Hawking radiation if it involved gravity, quantum effects, photons, relativity, or really anything else at all related to Hawking radiation besides waves.
Royale
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Good point Pyle. They could only have made the example clearer if they used any other example. Heh.

TehDog, I read the abstract and I still don't follow. It's actually funny to me that a water example is harder for me to mentally picture than anything I've read so far in quantum physics. I can (no joke) more easily picture a fourth spatial dimension, than picture what they're talking about.

Skeptic,
I'm glad it's not just me alone here.
lexington
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
What the hell was this?

They got the water moving faster than the speed of sound in water (just as in a black hole space flows faster than light) and watched how waves interacted with it.
Terrible_Bohr
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
We should now check with our most powerful telescopes a nearby black hole for a specific kind of radiation leaking from it. (what kind i don't know what ever kind they were talking about.)

I believe it's thermal radiation. The problem with detecting Hawking Radiation is that it's very, very faint, and black holes tend to surround themselves with matter and other radiation. That's what makes this experiment so interesting.
TehDog
Jan 18, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Ah, found some more background on this I think.
ht(you know what to do)p://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/12/9/095018/fulltext
Mostly way over my head, but hopefully some of it will sink in :)
ubavontuba
Jan 19, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Uh, How is this different from a Venturi effect?

http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venturi_effect

Or Bernoulli's principle?

http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli's_principle
antialias
Jan 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
What the hell was this?

My thought exactly.

The analogy between water waves and gravity waves seems rather...tenuous.

Paljor: The paper has this to say about your question:
Unfortunately, the question of whether black holes really radiate does not seem to be amenable to experimental investigation, because such radiation would be completely swamped by the cosmic microwave background.

...upon delving into the paper (no, I didn't understand it fully, either) there seems to be some correlation in the mathematics involved.

Rank 3.5 /5 (17 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • why do trucks have bigger brakes?
    created3 hours ago
  • Solar Sail Physics - Do they work on a large scale?
    created4 hours ago
  • How should I switch an air conditioner off?
    created4 hours ago
  • Question about current decay in R-L circuit
    created5 hours ago
  • Elementary time - how does it work?
    created7 hours ago
  • How can squinting be used by both a myopic & hyperopic eye?
    created10 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

More news stories

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (17) | comments 46 | with audio podcast

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (15) | comments 35 | with audio podcast feature

Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector

Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4.2 / 5 (6) | comments 15 | with audio podcast

Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?

The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.

Physics / General Physics

created May 21, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (3) | comments 8

Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector

A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 21, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (16) | comments 7 | with audio podcast


Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision

Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.