Many vulnerable patients have poor access to trauma care

Jan 17, 2011

A significant portion of the U.S. population does not have access to trauma care within an hours' drive, with certain vulnerable groups at higher risk of worse access, according to a report in the January issue of Archives of Surgery.

"Trauma centers are a key component of the infrastructure of the U.S. because they have been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality [illness and death] for injured patients of all age ranges, from children to the elderly," the authors write as background information in the article. "However, as highlighted in the media and in scholarly literature, trauma centers are more likely to be safety-net hospitals, are often underfunded, and are more likely to be poorly or not reimbursed for their provision of lifesaving but expensive care. These financial hardships are cited as contributing to the increasing closures of trauma centers in the United States and are part of the growing national crisis in access to ."

As trauma centers close, concern has increased regarding disparities in access to trauma care. Renee Hsia, M.D., M.Sc., of the University of California, San Francisco, and Yu-Chu Shen, Ph.D., of Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, Calif., linked data from an annual survey conducted by the American Hospital Association with zip code–level data from the U.S. Census. They then calculated the odds of having easy (defined as travel times of less than 20 minutes), moderate (travel times of 20 to 60 minutes) and difficult (travel times greater than 60 minutes) access to trauma care.

Overall, a significant segment of the population did not have access to trauma care within one hour of driving time. In urban areas, 67 percent of the population had easy access and 12 percent had difficult access; in rural areas, 24 percent had easy access and 31 percent had difficult access.

In addition, access to was uneven across communities, and areas with higher proportions of certain vulnerable groups had a higher risk of difficult access. "In particular, we found that areas with a higher proportion of certain groups, such as African American and near-poor populations in urban and rural areas and foreign-born populations in urban areas, were at higher risk of having difficult access to trauma centers or, in other words, were farther away from trauma centers," the authors write.

The findings do not suggest that trauma centers should be built in every small town in the United States, but highlight the fact that access is more limited for poor and minority populations in both rural and urban settings, they note. "Stakeholders and health care planners should consider these factors in the development of trauma systems because a mismatch of potential need and access could signal inefficiencies in the delivery of care," the authors conclude.

Explore further: Socioeconomic status and gender are associated with differences in cholesterol levels

More information: Arch Surg. 2011;146[1]:46-52.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Are trauma centers prepared for mass-casualty disasters?

Oct 20, 2006

Natural and manmade disasters, including the terrorist attacks of Sept.11, 2001 and Hurricane Katrina, have raised concerns about the capacity of trauma centers to absorb large numbers of patients from mass-casualty events. ...

Race and insurance status associated with death from trauma

Oct 20, 2008

African American and Hispanic patients are more likely to die following trauma than white patients, and uninsured patients have a higher death risk when compared with those who have health insurance, according to a report ...

Diabetics experience more complications following trauma

Jul 16, 2007

Individuals with diabetes appear to spend more days in the intensive care unit, use more ventilator support and have more complications during hospitalization for trauma than non-diabetics, according to a report in the July ...

Recommended for you

A VA exit strategy

3 hours ago

As the federal government plans its exit strategy from the war, now may be the time for it to rethink its role in providing health care to veterans, says a Perspective piece in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Real tremors, or drug-seeking patient? New app can tell

3 hours ago

A 42-year-old investment banker arrives at the emergency department with complaints of nausea, vomiting, anxiety and tremor. He drinks alcohol every day—often at business lunches, and at home every evening. ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

geokstr
1 / 5 (1) Jan 17, 2011
Yes, of course, we can certainly bend the cost curve for health care, already out of control, downward by rapidly expanding the number of high quality trauma centers, especially in poor neighborhoods, where a big chunk of the overdoses and knife and gunshot wounds occur anyway.

I have an idea. How about we close the ones at Harvard, and UCLA, and Beverly Hills, and other toney locations, so we can move the resources to where the rich can't have them either.

Then everyone can die equally as often.

Everywhere you look, the left, out of the purest intentions, of course, is trying to reduce the incentives for the poor to actually, like, you know, do something about their own situation. Like emphasizing study instead of sports and rap music, or holding up doctors, and teachers, and police and firefighters, and yes, even people who work in offices, as role models, instead of actors and athletes and druglords and other leeches on society.
ryggesogn2
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 17, 2011
Tucson Medical Center, a level 1 trauma center closed because of the failure of the federal govt to control the border.

In general, rural folks learn to fend for themselves and take fewer stupid risks, or die faster. Survival of the fittest.