Researchers can predict your video game aptitude by imaging your brain

Jan 13, 2011

Researchers report that they can predict "with unprecedented accuracy" how well you will do on a complex task such as a strategic video game simply by analyzing activity in a specific region of your brain.

The findings, published in the online journal , offer detailed insights into the brain structures that facilitate learning, and may lead to the development of training strategies tailored to individual strengths and weaknesses.

The new approach used established brain imaging techniques in a new way. Instead of measuring how differs before and after subjects learn a complex task, the researchers analyzed background activity in the basal ganglia, a group of brain structures known to be important for procedural learning, coordinated movement and feelings of reward.

Using and a method known as multivoxel pattern analysis, the researchers found significant differences in patterns of a particular type of MRI signal, called T2*, in the basal ganglia of study subjects. These differences enabled researchers to predict between 55 and 68 percent of the variance (differences in performance) among the 34 people who later learned to play the game.

"There are many, many studies, hundreds perhaps, in which psychometricians, people who do the quantitative analysis of learning, try to predict from SATs, GREs, MCATS or other tests how well you're going to succeed at something," said University of Illinois psychology professor and Beckman Institute director Art Kramer, who led the research. These methods, along with studies that look at the relative size of specific-brain structures, have had some success predicting learning, Kramer said, "but never to this degree in a task that is so complex."

"We take a fresh look at MRI images that are recorded routinely to investigate ," said Ohio State University psychology professor Dirk Bernhardt-Walther, who designed and performed the computational analysis together with Illinois electrical and computer engineering graduate student Loan Vo. "By analyzing these images in a new way, we find variations among participants in the patterns of brain activity in their basal ganglia," Bernhardt-Walther said. "Powerful statistical algorithms allow us to connect these patterns to individual learning success. Our method may be useful for predicting differences in abilities of individuals in other contexts as well," he said. "Testing this would be inexpensive because the method recycles MRI images that are recorded in many studies anyway."

After having their brains imaged, participants spent 20 hours learning to play Space Fortress, a video game developed at the University of Illinois in which players try to destroy a fortress without losing their own ship to one of several potential hazards. None of the subjects had much experience with video games prior to the study.

The game, which was designed to test participants' real-world cognitive skills, is quite challenging, Kramer said. It forces players to frequently shift their attention to pursue various goals or avoid threats. When they are first learning to play, study subjects "tend to start out with negative 2,000 points," he said. After 20 hours of training and practice, all the players' scores go up significantly. Some do much better than others, however, a difference that can be predicted to a large degree by analyzing activity in parts of the basal ganglia.

"We predict up to three times as much of the variance (in learning) as you would using performance measures," Kramer said. The researchers tested their results against other measures and replicated the findings in new trials with different study subjects.

The brain regions the researchers analyzed include the caudate (CAW'-date) nucleus and the putamen (pew-TAY'-min). These brain structures are active when one is engaged in learning new motor skills, such as moving a joystick, but they also are important in tasks that require one to strategize and quickly shift one's attention. A third region, the nucleus accumbens (ah-COME'-bins) is known to process emotions associated with reward or punishment.

The researchers found that patterns of activity in the putamen and caudate nucleus were better predictors of future performance than those in the nucleus accumbens. They also found that analyzing white matter (the axons and dendrites that carry signals between neurons), but not gray matter (the cell bodies), offered the best predictive power.

"Our data suggest that some persistent physiological and or neuroanatomical difference is actually the predictor of learning," Kramer said.

The findings should not be interpreted to mean that some people are destined to succeed or fail at a given task or learning challenge, however, Kramer said.

"We know that many of these components of brain structure and function are changeable," he said.

Explore further: Study links enzyme to autistic behaviors

More information: "Predicting Individual's Learning Success From Patterns of Pre-learning MRI Activity," PLoS ONE.

Related Stories

Children's brain development is linked to physical fitness

Sep 15, 2010

Researchers have found an association between physical fitness and the brain in 9- and 10-year-old children: Those who are more fit tend to have a bigger hippocampus and perform better on a test of memory than their less-fit ...

Unconscious learning uses old parts of the brain

Apr 06, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new study from the Swedish medical university Karolinska Institutet provides evidence that basic human learning systems use areas of the brain that also exist in the most primitive vertebrates, such as ...

Brain imaging identifies best memorization strategies

Aug 03, 2006

Exploring exactly why some individuals' memory skills are better than others has led researchers at Washington University in St. Louis to study the brain basis of learning strategies that healthy young adults ...

Scans show learning 'sculpts' the brain's connections

Oct 09, 2009

Spontaneous brain activity formerly thought to be "white noise" measurably changes after a person learns a new task, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and the University of Chieti, Italy, ...

Recommended for you

Study links enzyme to autistic behaviors

20 hours ago

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a genetic disorder that causes obsessive-compulsive and repetitive behaviors, and other behaviors on the autistic spectrum, as well as cognitive deficits. It is the most common ...

A new cause of mental disease?

Jul 23, 2014

Astrocytes, the cells that make the background of the brain and support neurons, might be behind mental disorders such as depression and schizophrenia, according to new research by a Portuguese team from ...

Molecular basis of age-related memory loss explained

Jul 22, 2014

From telephone numbers to foreign vocabulary, our brains hold a seemingly endless supply of information. However, as we are getting older, our ability to learn and remember new things declines. A team of ...

The neurochemistry of addiction

Jul 22, 2014

We've all heard the term "addictive personality," and many of us know individuals who are consistently more likely to take the extra drink or pill that puts them over the edge. But the specific balance of ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

haversine
not rated yet Jan 14, 2011
"The findings should not be interpreted to mean that some people are destined to succeed or fail at a given task or learning challenge, however..."

But they will be.
gwrede
not rated yet Jan 14, 2011
"The findings should not be interpreted to mean that some people are destined to succeed or fail at a given task or learning challenge, however..."

But they will be.
Not only will they be, they actually are predictors, and prove that some people are destined to fare better than others.

But stating this aloud today, is as bad as saying things about race.