Short-term volatility drives stock prices upward, research finds

Jan 17, 2011 By John Fedele

While savvy investors might say that a stock’s value is the determining factor for how much they’re willing to pay, Pitt researchers have shown that recent price trends and other aspects unrelated to a stock’s value are important in determining the price investors actually pay.

“A basic rationale for price movement is due to changes in the value of the asset. In the absence of any insight into the motivations of and traders, one might stipulate that prices should fluctuate randomly about this basic valuation,” says Gunduz Caginalp, professor of mathematics at Pitt, one of the authors of the study.

But Caginalp and one of his students, coauthor Mark DeSantis, found strong statistical evidence that a short-term price trend tends to increase trading prices in financial markets, to a magnitude of almost half that of valuation.

The researchers also found statistically significant positive impacts on the price with respect to the stock’s short-term volatility and volume trend, as well as to the nation’s money supply. According to the study, the findings about the money supply’s impact validate “asset-flow theory,” which holds that additional cash fuels trading price increases.

Caginalp finds the positive correlation of stocks’ short-term volatility to price surprising.

“In classical finance, the inverse risk-reward relationship stipulates that high volatility should be interpreted as greater risk, which should diminish the price that traders would pay for the ,” he said.

Caginalp hypothesizes that traders are attracted to high volatility because they foresee as an opportunity for greater profits.

In conducting the study, Caginalp and DeSantis had direct contact with data: The researchers analyzed a data set consisting of 111,356 records from 119 funds, corresponding with the daily closing of those funds for the 10-year period from Oct. 26, 1998, through Jan. 30, 2008.

“Papers that discuss motivations beyond valuation rarely have direct contact with market data,” says Caginalp. “As such, it is easy for exponents of efficient market theories to dismiss them.”

Explore further: What happened to savings for the future?

More information: Caginalp and DeSantis' findings appear in Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, which is currently available online at www.elsevier.com/locate/nonrwa and will be published in the journal in April 2011.

Provided by University of Pittsburgh

4 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Truth revealed in rare disaster theory

Oct 13, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Research that supports a theory that investors need to account for rare disasters when making decisions on the stockmarket has been accepted for publication in the international top journal in finance.

What could Facebook have to hide?

Jan 14, 2011

In a controversial move deemed either shrewd or unfair -- depending on whom you ask -- investment firm Goldman Sachs recently invested $450 million in the high-profile, world-changer Facebook. The deal provides Facebook with ...

Recommended for you

Industrial clusters fuel economies, according to study

Dec 22, 2014

Experts have long theorized that having a cluster of firms within a given industry helps a region's economy grow. Now a study co-authored by an MIT professor shows empirically that clusters of almost all ...

Economic output less dependent on road transportation

Dec 22, 2014

For the past 10 years, motorization in the U.S. has been on the decline, due mainly to more telecommuting, greater use of public transit, increased urbanization of the population and changes in the ages of drivers.

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.