Reverence for the heavens
January 14, 2011 By Leslie Mullen
Is this what our own Milky Way Galaxy looks like from far away? Similar in size and design to our home galaxy, spiral galaxy NGC 3370 is about 100 million light-years away, toward the constellation Leo. Credit: NASA, ESA, Hubble Heritage (STScI/AURA)
For some, the contemplation of the cosmos is a religious experience. Vatican astronomers say this can lead to profound insights about ourselves and the nature of the universe.
Our Sun is just one small point of light in the swirl of suns that shape the disc of the Milky Way. The galaxys hundreds of billions of stars are strewn so widely apart, it would take a spaceship traveling at the speed of light one hundred thousand years to travel the distance. The starry wheel of the galaxy turns around a massive black hole, a point of infinite density with gravity so complete that not even light can escape.
The structure and scale of our galaxy is astonishing. But ours is just one among hundreds of billions of galaxies in the universe.
Little wonder, then, that the contemplation of the cosmos can evoke the same emotions as religious awe and reverence. According to Father Paul Pavel Gabor, an astronomer for the Vatican Observatory, this is not always a positive experience. Just as some may experience fear and trembling when contemplating God and Heaven, there are those who become similarly overwhelmed when confronted with the astronomical proportions of the heavens.
They find it quite awe-inspiring, but in the wrong way, Gabor notes. When I show people pictures of the local cluster of galaxies, just to give them a sense of the scale of things, the reaction quite often is, Oh dear. Im completely insignificant, and Im uncomfortable about this whole universe thing.
Science, and particularly geometry and astronomy/astrology, was linked directly to the divine for most medieval scholars. The compass in this 13th century manuscript is a symbol of God's act of creation. God has created the universe after geometric and harmonic principles, to seek these principles was therefore to seek and worship God. Credit: Österreichische Nationalbibliothek
In Gabors view, one way to counter this despair is to have faith in a higher power, to believe in a God that created the universe as a gesture of love.Faith tells you that the universe is not something to intimidate you, but it is something given to you as a gift, by somebody who wants to give you something nice, something pretty, he says. So looking at those astronomy pictures, you can either feel that the glass is half full, and believe that youre really being given something here, or you can feel the glass is half empty and this is just frightening and you want to hide in your little rabbit hole somewhere.
Whether you are terrified or thrilled by the grandeur of the universe, there is no disputing its elemental nature: it is the source of us all. As Carl Sagan once said, We are made of star stuff. The chemical elements that shape the breadth of creation also form our galaxy, our planet and even the cells of our bodies. Exploring the cosmos therefore is one way to get close to a grand creator. This notion is reflected in the final lines of John Gillespie Magee Jr.s poem High Flight, which President Reagan read at the memorial service for the Challenger astronauts:
with silent, lifting mind I've trod
The high untrespassed sanctity of space,
Put out my hand, and touched the face of God.
The Great Architect
The term cosmos means ordered world. For most of recorded history, humans have believed that God created the ordered universe out of chaos. This belief is still shared by a majority of people around the world today, but aspects of that faith have changed as our scientific knowledge of the cosmos has grown. For instance, Gabors colleague, Vatican astronomer Brother Guy Consolmagno, says that while many people believe God created the universe, they think its very enormity makes it impossible for God to take any personal note of us. This mote of dust we call planet Earth is insignificantly tiny in comparison to the smallest of stars, and each of our lives lasts for the briefest of cosmic moments.
Timeline of events that followed the Big Bang. Rather than matter and energy erupting into a pre-existing space, modern Big Bang theory holds that space and time came into being simultaneously with matter and energy. Recent observations, including those by NASA's WMAP orbiting oberatory favor specific inflation scenarios over other long held ideas. Credit: NASA
Some people will refuse to believe because they still havent grasped what kind of God were talking about, a God that is so other that it is possible, says Consolmagno.This philosophical notion of a God for whom all things are possible, and who is beyond our basic human capacity of understanding, finds an echo in the still mysterious nature of the universe. For instance, most of the universe is currently attributed to the obscure categories dark energy and dark matter. Writing in Scientific American, the astrophysicist David Cline noted those terms are really just expressions of our ignorance.
Another area of scientific ignorance is the time before the Big Bang. What, if anything, happened before the universe began its current outward expansion? The Roman Catholic priest Georges Lemaître originally proposed the idea that the universe expanded from an initial point (which he called the primeval atom), and the Catholic Church supported the Big Bang theory even before most cosmologists did. This day without yesterday was seen as being consistent with the creation ex nihilo (out of nothing) as described in the Book of Genesis.
According to a recent Reuters news report, Pope Benedict XVI said that "God's mind was behind complex scientific theories such as the Big Bang". The Pope did not cite the Big Bang specifically, but spoke more generally about the creation of the universe:
"The universe is not the result of chance, as some would like to believe. In contemplating it, we are invited to read for ourselves something quite profound: the wisdom of the Creator, the inexhaustible imagination of God, his infinite love for us. We should not let ourselves be limited by the concept of theories that only arrive at a certain point and which -- if you look closely -- are not set up as rivals of faith, but don't manage to explain the ultimate sense of reality. In the beauty of the world, in its mystery, in its grandness and in its rationality how can we not read the eternal rationality, and how can we do nothing less than to be taken by hand as it leads us to the ultimate unique God, creator of heaven and earth."
-- Read the entire homily (in the original Italian):
In another talk given at a different time, Pope Benedict said that one way we could try to understand the universe better is through mathematics:
[Galileo] was convinced that God has given us two books, the book of Sacred Scripture and the book of Nature. And the language of Nature -- this was his conviction -- was mathematics, so it is the language of God, a language of the Creator. The surprising thing is that this invention of our human intellect is truly key to understanding Nature, that Nature is truly structured in a mathematical way, and that our mathematics, invented by our human mind, is truly the instrument for working with Nature, to put it at our service, to use it through technology.
-Read the entire translated homily
Consolmagno says that some wonder whether mathematics was invented by man to describe Nature, or whether we discovered the mathematical properties that were built into Nature by a higher power.
Maybe its a little bit of both, he says. The thing that always astonishes me, beyond the fact that the universe is mathematical, the universe makes sense. The mathematics is beautiful. When a student grasps what Maxwells equations tell them, theres this leap of joy thats as great as looking at the sunset that Maxwells equations can explain. Why it should work at all is something no philosopher has been able to figure out.
Provided by
Astrobio.net
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Scotland passes turbine test to harness tidal power,
41 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
7 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
7 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
7 hours ago |
4.3 / 5 (9) |
0
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
7 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
0
Dragon makes history with space station docking
The private company SpaceX made history Friday with the docking of its Dragon capsule to the International Space Station, the most impressive feat yet in turning routine spaceflight over to the commercial ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
22 hours ago |
4.9 / 5 (9) |
0
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Transvaginal mesh op restores pelvic organ prolapse at price
(HealthDay) -- Transvaginal mesh (TVM) procedures are effective for anatomical restoration of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but patients report a worsening of sexual function following surgery, according to ...
High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts
Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.
Travel to high altitudes tied to Crohn's, colitis flare-ups
(HealthDay) -- People with inflammatory bowel disease, which includes Crohn's disease and colitis, may be at increased risk for flare-ups when they fly or travel to high altitudes for skiing or mountain climbing, ...


Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (12)
Yea, that's the ticket, lie to yourself, believe in magic.
Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (7)
Clarke's Three Laws are three "laws" of prediction formulated by the British writer and scientist Arthur C. Clarke. They are:
1.When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right; when he states that something is impossible, he is probably wrong.
2.The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
3.Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (9)
Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (13)
This statement presupposes that religious belief is a matter of choice. It isn't. Those who can't accept invalid arguments and wishful beliefs arn't immoral or being stubborn. It has been my experience that most religious believers think that unbelivers have some ulterior motive in rejecting the believer's unsound arguments. This is an immature view.
Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
If there is a God, the mathematics He used to create the universe is quantum mechanics. To me the fact that scientists discovered how to make sense out of quantum mechanics is the true miracle. (I'm old enough to remember when "the problem of infinities" was a real problem, originally solved by a patchwork quilt of renormalization. Today those tricks of mathematics that made the infinities go away are just taught as: "This is the way you do the math so you get a usable answer.)
Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (8)
Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (9)
It's appropriate to quote a fiction writer in defense of religion.
It irks me how church officials love to point out that the understanding of god is beyond our comprehension, so we shouldn't question it. However, the officials themselves seem to be more than willing to tell us all about god and what he wants from us. Funny, that.
Jan 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Jan 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
Jan 15, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
Jan 15, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
Dogma, claiming to have truth, is as dangerous in science as it is in religion.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Jan 15, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
If it wasn't for the final 'by a higher power' part, both assertions would be true.
As soon as you have two or more objects that can be counted and a mind that can reason symbolically, you've invented mathematics, and the rest is history.
Jan 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Maybe you don't understand the language outside of science, so I'll translate for you: "The understanding of the godesses is not a matter of rational reasoning, so don't try to verify or falsify it".If somebody asks them why shouldn't they answer?
Would you refrain from telling some curious pupil all about science after being asked?
The real problems come when we try to tell other people (our kids) how to behave although they don't want to hear anything on that subject.
But we would never try to enforce our opinion on other adults, wouldn't we?
Jan 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Let's assume the author of this sentence knows the semantical difference between "lying" and "erring".
Then, what can we conclude about the author's practical stance on truth?
Jan 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Because, in my insider experience, it depends on education. In fact, it was my teacher in religion, a Catholic priest and academic, who told me that it is not the belief which defines whether you are good or evil but your behaviour towards human beings.
That there are evil people on one's own side of the fence and that there are "saints" on the other side of one's fence.
And that's my credo, too.
Jan 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The SM fits excellently for the RCC.
Jan 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
In finding Teilhard deChardin on Wiki, as a Jesuit priest (died 1955), it states he had many serious disagreements with the Catholic church that were NOT embraced, and some writings were denied publication due to doctrine, especially his ideas on the creation. His name is totally unfamiliar to me as a person with a creation theory.
I would be glad to know that I am completely wrong about the church embracing the explosion of an atom theory for creation, as put forth by Georges Lemaitre. Do you know of any books, doctrines to that effect? Until then, I will be thoroughly dismayed at the church taking credit for embracing the so-called Big Bang.
Jan 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Ethelred
Jan 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The RCC refrains from judging scientific details like that. They only declare whether a theory is (not) compatible with their doctrines. The BigBang model is highly compatibel.
Jan 27, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jan 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The way you ask the question I humbly assume that your understanding of these symbols is the colloquial one.
Nevertheless we live in a digital era and you should have heard of non-decimal number systems where e.g. 5 + 5 = A is the correct (hexadecimal) representation of the corresponding decimal 5 + 5 = 10. In another number system 2 + 2 = 10 is correct and so on.
Thus, 2 + 2 = 5 might be correct depending on the underlying assumptions. The layman knows one underlying assumption only, the naive one. The mathematician however sees an infinity of possibilities.
Jan 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jan 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jan 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
There is not just one mathematics, but an infinite number of possible mathematics derived from different axiom sets. Many of these new branches of mathematics are interesting extensions of previous mathematics, although some, like non-Euclidian geometry, replace one axiom with another.
To me, as a mathematician, the amazing thing is how often these new mathematics later turn out to be useful in explaining some aspect of reality. Right now, physicists are applying Hawking's model of black holes, including evaporation to other physical systems which can be constructed in the laboratory. (I guess it is possible to conceive of a lab where you can create black holes and watch them evaporate. I certainly don't think the LHC is that lab, although it comes close. ;-)
Jan 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Humility and reverence may be natural consequences of realizing how little we know compared to the enormity of the cosmos.
Five decades (50 = 2010-1960) of "truthing" were required for us to finally realize that what we call the Sun is actually a brightly glowing sphere of waste (91% H and 9% He) from the neutron star ~700,000 km below!
See “Neutron Repulsion” [db (DOT) tt/9SrfTiZ], The APERION Journal, in press, 2011, 19 pp.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Jan 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
1. youtube.com/watch?v=AQZe_Qk-q7M
2. youtube.com/user/omatumr#p/u/1/sXNyLYSiPO0