Physicists take new look at the atom

Jan 17, 2011 By Daniel Stolte
Graduate student Vincent Lonij (left), associate professor of physics Alex Cronin, research assistant Will Holmgren and undergraduate student Catherine Klauss perform maintenance on a chamber used to beam atoms through a grating to measure a tiny force that helps physicists better understand the structure of atoms. (Photo by Norma Jean Gargasz/UANews)

(PhysOrg.com) -- University of Arizona physicists have discovered a new way to measure how single atoms interact with a surface. Their findings help develop nanotechnology and test new theories about the internal structure of atoms.

Measuring the between and surfaces with unprecedented precision, University of Arizona physicists have produced data that could refine our understanding of the structure of atoms and improve nanotechnology. The discovery has been published in the journal .

Van der Waals forces are fundamental for chemistry, biology and physics. However, they are among the weakest known , so they are notoriously hard to study. This force is so weak that it is hard to notice in everyday life. But delve into the world of micro-machines and nano-robots, and you will feel the force – everywhere.

"If you make your components small enough, eventually this van-der-Waals potential starts to become the dominant interaction," said Vincent Lonij, a graduate student in the UA department of physics who led the research as part of his doctoral thesis.

"If you make tiny, tiny gears for a nano-robot, for example, those gears just stick together and grind to a halt. We want to better understand how this force works."

To study the van-der-Waals force, Lonij and his co-workers Will Holmgren, Cathy Klauss and associate professor of physics Alex Cronin designed a sophisticated experimental setup that can measure the interactions between single atoms and a surface. The physicists take advantage of quantum mechanics, which states that atoms can be studied and described both as particles and as waves.

"We shoot a beam of atoms through a grating, sort of like a micro-scale picket fence," Lonij explained. "As the atoms pass through the grating, they interact with the surface of the grating bars, and we can measure that interaction."

As the atoms pass through the slits in the grating, the van-der-Waals force attracts them to the bars separating the slits. Depending on how strong the interaction, it changes the atom's trajectory, just like a beam of light is bent when it passes through water or a prism.

A wave passing through the middle of the slit does so relatively unencumbered. On the other hand, if an atom wave passes close by the slit's edges, it interacts with the surface and skips a bit ahead, "out of phase," as physicists say.

"After the atoms pass through the grating, we detect how much the waves are out of phase, which tells us how strong the van-der-Waals potential was when the atoms interacted with the surface."

Mysterious as it seems, without the van-der-Waals force, life would be impossible. For example, it helps the proteins that make up our bodies to fold into the complex structures that enable them to go about their highly specialized jobs.

Unlike magnetic attraction, which affects only metals or matter carrying an electric current, van-der-Waals forces make anything stick to anything, provided the two are extremely close to each other. Because the force is so weak, its action doesn't range beyond the scale of atoms – which is precisely the reason why there is no evidence of such a force in our everyday world and why we leave it to physicists such as Lonij to unravel its secrets.

Initially, he was driven simply by curiosity, Lonij said. When he started his project, he didn't know it would lead to a new way of measuring the forces between atoms and surfaces that may change the way physicists think about atoms.

And with a smile, he added, "I thought it would be fitting to study this force, since I am from the Netherlands; Mr. van der Waals was Dutch, too."

In addition to proving that core electrons contribute to the van-der-Waals potential, Lonij and his group made another important discovery.

Physicists around the world who are studying the structure of the atom are striving for benchmarks that enable them to test their theories about how atoms work and interact. "Our measurements of atom-surface potentials can serve as such benchmarks," Lonij explained. "We can now test atomic theory in a new way."

Studying how atoms interact is difficult because they are not simply tiny balls. Instead, they are what physicists call many-body systems. "An atom consists of a whole bunch of other particles, electrons, neutrons, protons, and so forth," Lonij said.

Even though the atom as a whole holds no net electric charge, the different charged particles moving around in its interior are what create the van-der-Waals force in the first place.

"What happens is that the electrons, which hold all the negative charge, and the protons, which hold all the positive charge, are not always in the same places. So you can have tiny little differences in charge that are fluctuating very fast. If you put a charge close to a surface, you induce an image charge. In a highly simplified way, you could say the atom is attracted to its own reflection."

To physicists, who prefer things neat and clean and tractable with razor-sharp mathematics, such a system, made up from many smaller particles zooming around each other, is difficult to pin down. To add to the complication, most surfaces are not clean. As Lonij puts it, "Comparing such a dirty system to theory is a big challenge, but we figured out a way to do it anyway."

"A big criticism of this type of work always was, ‘well, you're measuring this atom-surface potential, but you don't know what the surface looks like so you don't know what you're really measuring.'"

To eliminate this problem, Lonij's team used different types of atoms and looked at how each interacted with the same surface.

"Our technique gives you the ratio of potentials directly without ever knowing the potential for either of the two atoms," he said. "When I started five years ago, the uncertainty in these types of measurements was 20 percent. We brought it down to two percent."

The most significant discovery was that an atom's inner electrons, orbiting the nucleus at a closer range than the atom's outer electrons, influence the way the atom interacts with the surface.

"We show that these core electrons contribute to the atom-surface potential," Lonij said, "which was only known in theory until now. This is the first experimental demonstration that core electrons affect atom-surface potentials."

"But what is perhaps more important," he added, "is that you can also turn it around. We now know that the core electrons affect atom-surface potentials. We also know that these core electrons are hard to calculate in atomic theory. So we can use measurements of atom-surface potentials to make the theory better: The theory of the atom."

Explore further: Universe may face a darker future

More information: prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v105/i23/e233202

Related Stories

Organic Molecules Stay on Top

Nov 19, 2007

The van der Waals force, a weak attractive force, is solely responsible for binding certain organic molecules to metallic surfaces. In a model for organic devices, it is this force alone that binds an organic film to a metallic ...

Experiments Prove Existence of Atomic Chain Anchors

Feb 03, 2005

Atoms at the ends of self-assembled atomic chains act like anchors with lower energy levels than the “links” in the chain, according to new measurements by physicists at the National Institute of Standards ...

Researchers Holding Steady in an Atomic-Scale Tug-of-War

Mar 31, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- How hard do you have to pull on a single atom of -- let's say -- gold to detach it from the end of a chain of like atoms?* It's a measure of the astonishing progress in nanotechnology that ...

Scientists Image the 'Anatomy' of a Molecule (w/ Video)

Aug 28, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- For the first time, IBM researchers in Zurich, Switzerland, have taken a 3D image of an individual molecule. Using an atomic force microscope, the researchers constructed a "force map" of ...

Recommended for you

Universe may face a darker future

22 minutes ago

New research offers a novel insight into the nature of dark matter and dark energy and what the future of our Universe might be.

High-intensity sound waves may aid regenerative medicine

18 hours ago

Researchers at the University of Washington have developed a way to use sound to create cellular scaffolding for tissue engineering, a unique approach that could help overcome one of regenerative medicine's ...

Formula could shed light on global climate change

23 hours ago

Wright State University researchers have discovered a formula that accurately predicts the rate at which soil develops from the surface to the underlying rock, a breakthrough that could answer questions about ...

User comments : 14

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gwrede
1 / 5 (1) Jan 17, 2011
"An atom consists of a whole bunch of other particles, electrons, neutrons, protons, and so forth," Lonij said.
Damn. I need to brush up on physics...
AlexanderThink
not rated yet Jan 17, 2011
"An atom consists of a whole bunch of other particles, electrons, neutrons, protons, and so forth," Lonij said.
Damn. I need to brush up on physics...

No need to revise your physics. They are probably babbling about the force carriers. And maybe the quarks. But mentioning neutrons and protons, they are implying quarks. Damn, i'm talking again with myself.
Pyle
2 / 5 (1) Jan 17, 2011
This is going to explode. We are going to have scores of labs performing this testing on many different permutations of materials and temperatures. Advances in lubricants, synthetic proteins, superconductivity?

Trans-uranium elements and the so called island of stability?
Wulfgar
not rated yet Jan 17, 2011
Is this a blow to the Casimir Effect? I thought there was some thinking that Van Der Waals and Casimir might be the same thing... No Vacuum energy contribution?
Question
1 / 5 (1) Jan 17, 2011
They mention that the van-der-Waals force is not a magnetic force and it doesn't appear to be caused by the strong or weak nuclear forces and it is much stronger than the gravitational force so that only leaves the slight static electrical charges as to the source. That would appear to be the source since atoms and molecules even after they form chemical bonds still have uneven electrical charges on their surfaces while being electrically neutral over-all.
Pyle
5 / 5 (1) Jan 17, 2011
Question:
The article explains the source of the force - movement of charge "within" the atom. I don't think static electrical charge is quite the right way to describe it since on the macro scale that involves the release of electrons.

Your second sentence is more on point.

Wulfgar - I don't think so. The gist I get here is that they believe the Van Der Waals force is caused by the changing position of charge "within" the atom.
Parsec
5 / 5 (5) Jan 17, 2011
Is this a blow to the Casimir Effect? I thought there was some thinking that Van Der Waals and Casimir might be the same thing... No Vacuum energy contribution?

No, the Van Der Walls effect is the attractive force between atoms caused by the electrons in each influencing the other.

The Casmir effect is caused by quantum effects. They are quite different and have much different magnitudes (strengths).
Question
1 / 5 (1) Jan 17, 2011
Pyle: You may be right. But t would seem that "movement of charge within the atom" could not stop the tiny gears in a
nano-robot. Relatively fixed minor charges on the surface of an atom or molecule probably could.
ForFreeMinds
1 / 5 (3) Jan 17, 2011
I personally find this a fascinating development. The ability to measure atom surface potentials so much better should advance theoretical physics, as well as have potential practical applications.
Pyle
5 / 5 (1) Jan 18, 2011
Question:

Relatively fixed minor charges on the surface of an atom or molecule probably could.


Huh? What is the surface of an atom or molecule? What would cause such a "relatively fixed" charge?

I think you are not properly conceptualizing the atom at the quantum level. Atoms aren't little balls in an OChem set when viewed at this scale. They are probability clouds where precision is impossible due to quantum uncertainty. (Quantum effects are in play here too, but don't confuse this as being in disagreement with Parsec's point above.)
Question
1 / 5 (1) Jan 18, 2011
Quote from article: "Our measurements of atom-surface potentials can serve as such benchmarks," Lonij explained. "We can now test atomic theory in a new way."

Pyle: Isn't it generally accepted that molecules have a shape? Well where and why would molecules have shape? It comes from the shape of the very atoms that the molecule is composed of. The shape of atoms and molecules come from the varying electromagnetic field on their surfaces.
The quantum idea of a shapeless uniform atom needs to be revised. While the electrons in an atom are not in fixed positions they aren't everywhere at once either. They most likely oscillate in relatively fixed positions. This in turn gives the atom a charge shape, or "surface potential", which is over all neutral.
Pyle
3 / 5 (2) Jan 18, 2011
Question: To avoid a semantics argument, yes, I can concede your point. Just don't get too tied to "surface" and "oscillation in relatively fixed positions".

Somebody else chime in here, but I kind of think electrons ARE "everywhere" within their probability cloud at once. The measured effect of the Van der Waals forces, to my understanding, varies based upon the degree to which the electrons potential is on the outer layer (surface) of the probability cloud.

To go back where I think this started, static electricity is the transfer of electrons between atoms creating charged ions. That is not what is being measured here.
bluehigh
1 / 5 (1) Jan 18, 2011
.. is caused by the changing position of charge "within" the atom.
.. They most likely oscillate in relatively fixed positions.

How far do these charge variations move and at what velocity. Is this movement non-radiative through constant velocity/direction or do these charge variations change in acceleration and if so what are the radiative components? Any cyclic behaviour or patterns to these supposed charge variations on these so-called atom surfaces?

gwrede
2.6 / 5 (5) Jan 19, 2011
I need help from everyone:

P L E A S E H E L P U S G E T

R I D O F T H I S !!!!

We CAN get rid of this. Please, EVERY time you see this ad, or similar, do press the _report_abuse_ button! That will annoy the administrators within a few weeks enough to really DO something about it.

But, we really need everyone's help here.

welcome to our website:
=== W W W - Lttsy - c o m ===

50%off ca,ed hardy t-shirt$22 jeans,coach

* * *

enjoy yourself.
thank you!!
=== W W W (Lttsy) c o m ===

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.