Patent infringement verdict restored against Microsoft

Jan 05, 2011
A US appeals court has restored a verdict that found computer software giant Microsoft had infringed on a patent for an anti-piracy technology owned by a competitor, Uniloc USA.

A US appeals court restored a verdict that found Microsoft infringed on a patent for an anti-piracy technology owned by a competitor, Uniloc USA. But the court did not reaffirm a 388-million-dollar jury award.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overruled the decision of a lower court judge who threw out a jury's guilty verdict against Microsoft in September.

At the same time, it found that the method the jury used to calculate Uniloc's damages, known as the "25 percent rule," was "fundamentally flawed."

Jury's often estimate a plaintiff's losses as being 25 percent of the expected profits of the product containing the .

But in its 59-page opinion, the appeals court ruled that was insufficient to establish a reasonable for the technology's use.

The court said a new trial would be required to establish damages and interest due Uniloc.

Uniloc, which makes , called the ruling a "significant victory" in its eight-year-old suit against Microsoft over an anti-piracy system used in its Windows XP and Office XP products.

"We are very pleased with the ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit," Uniloc CEO Brad Davis said.

"This decision illustrates how large corporations, like Microsoft, have knowingly infringed on our technology for financial gain. We are proud of the work that we have accomplished since our founding and will continue to vigorously defend our existing and future innovations."

Explore further: Out-of-patience investors sell off Amazon

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Microsoft ordered to pay $388 mln in patent case

Apr 09, 2009

A federal jury ordered US software giant Microsoft on Wednesday to pay 388 million dollars to Uniloc for infringing on an anti-piracy software patent held by the Singapore- and US-based company.

Court Denies Vonage Bid for Patent Case Retrial

May 04, 2007

A U.S. appeals court denies a request by Internet phone company Vonage Holdings that it order a retrial in the patent infringement case brought against it by Verizon Communications.

Verdict spares Microsoft $358M in patent damages

Sep 11, 2009

(AP) -- A federal appeals court said Friday that Microsoft Corp. does not have to pay Alcatel-Lucent $358 million for patent infringement because of problems with how the damages were calculated.

Recommended for you

Out-of-patience investors sell off Amazon

3 hours ago

Amazon has long acted like an ideal customer on its own website: a freewheeling big spender with no worries about balancing a checkbook. Investors confident in founder and CEO Jeff Bezos' invest-and-expand ...

States ascend into the cloud

10 hours ago

Seven years ago, the state of Delaware started moving computer servers out of closets and from under workers' desks to create a consolidated data center and a virtual computing climate.

Microsoft drops Nokia name from smartphones

12 hours ago

Microsoft said Friday it was dropping the Nokia name from its Lumia smartphones, rebranding following the acquisition earlier this year of the Finnish group's handset division.

Amazon's loss makes holidays a question mark

12 hours ago

Amazon's trademark smile icon is becoming more of a grimace. The world's largest online retailer reported a wider third-quarter loss than analysts expected and gave a disappointing holiday forecast.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet Jan 05, 2011
If this holds up, then whoever invents the first quantum encryption in a quantum computer will "legally" rule the world, since nobody else will have a "legal" right to do much of anything with quantum computers.
yempski
not rated yet Jan 05, 2011
If this holds up, then whoever invents the first quantum encryption in a quantum computer will "legally" rule the world, since nobody else will have a "legal" right to do much of anything with quantum computers.


Rubbish !!

My understanding is that Uniloc offered to sell the tech to M$ and were rejected. M$ then copied Uniloc's IP in their products.