Government's 'nudge' approach may struggle to make an impression, warn experts

Jan 25, 2011

The government's "nudge" approach to public health may struggle to make much impression on improving population health, warn experts in the British Medical Journal today.

An accompanying editorial argues that the notion of nudging adds nothing to existing approaches and risks wasting resources.

Theresa Marteau, Director of the Behaviour and Health Research Unit at Cambridge University (the Department of Unit on Behaviour and Health), and colleagues ask whether the concept stands up to scientific scrutiny as a basis for improving .

Nudging involves altering environments to prompt healthier behaviour, without banning particular choices or using .

The concept of nudging people towards healthier behaviour has captured the imagination of the public, researchers, and policy makers, say the authors. Its appeal lies in the seemingly simple, low cost solutions that can be applied to a wide array of problems, and there is some evidence that it can work.

For example, putting yellow duct tape across the width of supermarket trolleys with a sign requesting shoppers to place fruit and vegetables in front of the line doubled fruit and vegetable purchasing, and placing fruit by the cash register increased the amount of fruit bought by school children at lunchtime by 70%.

However, they argue that, "at present, the evidence to support the view that nudging alone can improve population health is weak." They also point out that nudging has the potential to generate harms as well as benefits, particularly if an emphasis on nudging results in a neglect of other, potentially more effective interventions.

Nudging is often used very effectively by industry to prompt unhealthy behaviour, for example in the marketing of food and alcohol.

The authors argue that effective nudging "may require legislation, either to implement healthy nudges … or to prevent unhealthy nudges from industry."

The authors argue that research is needed to determine the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of nudging and related ideas. Currently there is precious little good science on which to build practical examples which would work.

They conclude: "Without regulation to limit the potent effects of unhealthy nudges in existing environments shaped largely by industry, nudging towards healthier behaviour may struggle to make much impression on the scale and distribution of behaviour change needed to improve population health to the level required to reduce the burden of chronic disease in the UK and beyond."

In an editorial, Chris Bonell and colleagues at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine also question whether it is clear what is meant by nudging and whether it really offers anything new, and warn that "little progress will be made if public health policy is made largely on the basis of ideology and ill defined notions that fail to deal with the range of barriers to healthy living."

A blog by BMJ News Editor, Annabel Ferriman, argues that the Conservatives have invented the nudge as a new way of encouraging people to live in a healthy way, and asks: can you tell your nudge from your nanny?

Explore further: Tip-over furniture can kill kids

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Unhealthy lifestyle more than doubles stroke risk

Feb 20, 2009

People who lead unhealthy lifestyles are more than twice as likely to suffer a stroke than those who eat and drink sensibly, don't smoke, and take regular exercise, finds a study published on bmj.com today.

Sexual health: Computer-based approaches increase knowledge

Sep 08, 2010

Interactive computer packages are effective in improving knowledge about sexual health, according to a new study by Cochrane researchers. Computer-based approaches could help to tackle problems such as sexually transmitted ...

Claiming benefits improves the health of the unemployed

Mar 06, 2009

Unemployment benefits help reduce the negative health-related behaviours often associated with being unemployed. A study published in the open access journal BMC Public Health has found that unemployment benefits recipients are le ...

Recommended for you

Tip-over furniture can kill kids

47 minutes ago

(HealthDay)—It can happen in an instant: A small child pulls up on a television, dresser or computer monitor and gets critically injured when the furniture tips over.

Slow progress toward meaningful use stage 2

1 hour ago

(HealthDay)—Providers and hospitals are making slow progress toward achieving meaningful use stage 2, according to an article published July 10 in Medical Economics.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

geokstr
1 / 5 (1) Jan 25, 2011
This is how socialism gradually slips into its logical conclusion, totalitarianism.

Our leaders, the credentialed elites, who know much better than we do what's best for us, first give us a "nudge". That's doesn't work, so next comes the "shove". Frustration sets in - why are the peasants not listening to their betters? So then we get the "command". This leads to outright resistance from the proles.

So finally, the resort is to the pogroms and purges, to enforce obedience by whatever means necessary; starvation, execution, being worked to death in the gulags. It's already cost over 100 million poor bastards their lives since 1917. And that's only the citizens killed by their own Marxist governments, not casualties of war between nations.
saklat
not rated yet Jan 27, 2011
None of the public I know have had our imagination caught by 'nudging' - we were all hyperventilating (surely not good for our health?) at some of the Government's Behavioural Unit's illogical suggestions. (Musical notes on stairs = cacophony; computer game vouchers for children = more inactive behaviour) Why don't they stop allowing the selling off of school sports facilities and re-introduce physical education?