'Nuclear' candy turns out to be toxic

Jan 14, 2011

US authorities issued a recall Friday for a brand of Pakistan-made candy called Toxic Waste Nuclear Sludge Chew Bars because it turns out the sweets actually are toxic.

Tests showed that the cherry flavoring in the chew bars contained extremely high levels of lead -- 0.24 parts per million when the US limit is 0.1.

"That potentially could cause health problems, particularly for infants, small children, and ," the said.

The recall affects all flavors of the and all the bars the company ever made from its inception in 2007 until January 2011.

The candy was imported from Pakistan by an Indiana-based company called Circle City Marketing and Distributing, which said it has not received any reports of sickness from the product.

Explore further: Oil-swishing craze: Snake oil or all-purpose remedy?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Sambirano chocolate bars are recalled

Jul 09, 2007

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has announced the voluntary recall of Scharffen Berger Kumasi Sambirano chocolate bars because of mislabeling.

Salmonella scare prompts legal action

Apr 23, 2007

A salmonella scare in Britain leading to the recall of 1 million Cadbury chocolate bars has prompted authorities to begin prosecuting the candymaker.

Ferrari chocolate candy is recalled

Jun 07, 2007

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has announced the recall of Ferrari Chocolates because of undeclared peanuts and possible fungi contamination.

Harry & David recall nut-containing candy

Apr 16, 2007

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced the recall of approximately 2,000 boxes of candies distributed by the Harry & David Operations Corp.

Recommended for you

Suddenly health insurance is not for sale

Apr 18, 2014

(HealthDay)— Darlene Tucker, an independent insurance broker in Scotts Hill, Tenn., says health insurers in her area aren't selling policies year-round anymore.

Study: Half of jailed NYC youths have brain injury (Update)

Apr 18, 2014

About half of all 16- to 18-year-olds coming into New York City's jails say they had a traumatic brain injury before being incarcerated, most caused by assaults, according to a new study that's the latest in a growing body ...

Autonomy and relationships among 'good life' goals

Apr 18, 2014

Young adults with Down syndrome have a strong desire to be self-sufficient by living independently and having a job, according to a study into the meaning of wellbeing among young people affected by the disorder.

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Royale
5 / 5 (1) Jan 14, 2011
Pakistan's apparent weak try at terrorism. (That was a joke by the way, so no flaming please).

I love that quote; "The recall affects all flavors of the candy and all the bars the company ever made from its inception in 2007 until January 2011."

Hahaha. We're recalling everything this company has ever made.
dirk_bruere
5 / 5 (5) Jan 14, 2011
Seems the name is quite accurate.
sstritt
3.4 / 5 (5) Jan 14, 2011
Truth in advertising!
gwrede
3 / 5 (4) Jan 14, 2011
Circle City Marketing and Distributing, which said it has not received any reports of sickness from the product.
Duh!

If the levels are only 2 1/2 times the legal minimum, how could there be any sickness.

But that's hardly the point, now is it?
mvg
5 / 5 (1) Jan 14, 2011
Who would have guesssed it was really toxic??
Bob_Kob
3 / 5 (4) Jan 14, 2011
Why is is always lead...
fixer
5 / 5 (2) Jan 14, 2011
2 1/2 times the MAXIMUM.

But yeah, more manufacturers should advertise accurately.
Skeptic_Heretic
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 15, 2011
2 1/2 times the MAXIMUM.
Doesn't it disturb you people that there is an acceptable maximum amount of lead allowed in any candy?

What exactly is an acceptable amount of lead in candy? According to the article, it's 0.1 ppm

trekgeek1
2 / 5 (1) Jan 16, 2011
2 1/2 times the MAXIMUM.
Doesn't it disturb you people that there is an acceptable maximum amount of lead allowed in any candy?

What exactly is an acceptable amount of lead in candy? According to the article, it's 0.1 ppm



You'll never remove every atom of certain elements from food, so it's reasonable to allow a tolerable limit.
Veneficus
1 / 5 (3) Jan 17, 2011
A factor 2.5 can hardly be called dangerous. Safety margins will be higher than that anyway.
fixer
5 / 5 (1) Jan 18, 2011
They probably are, but would you willinly eat lead?

More news stories

UAE reports 12 new cases of MERS

Health authorities in the United Arab Emirates have announced 12 new cases of infection by the MERS coronavirus, but insisted the patients would be cured within two weeks.

Filipino tests negative for Middle East virus

A Filipino nurse who tested positive for the Middle East virus has been found free of infection in a subsequent examination after he returned home, Philippine health officials said Saturday.

Easter morning delivery for space station

Space station astronauts got a special Easter treat: a cargo ship full of supplies. The shipment arrived Sunday morning via the SpaceX company's Dragon cargo capsule.

Hackers of Oman news agency target Bouteflika

Hackers on Sunday targeted the website of Oman's official news agency, singling out and mocking Algeria's newly re-elected president Abdelaziz Bouteflika as a handicapped "dictator".

NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs

Robonaut, the first out-of-this-world humanoid, is finally getting its space legs. For three years, Robonaut has had to manage from the waist up. This new pair of legs means the experimental robot—now stuck ...