(PhysOrg.com) -- It was one of the most infamous murders in British history: Hawley Crippen, a doctor from Michigan, was convicted and hanged in 1910 for murdering his showgirl wife and burying some of her remains in their London cellar.
But now, a hundred years later, a team of forensic scientists led by Michigan State Universitys David Foran has provided evidence that those remains were not Cora Crippens.
In fact, they were not even from a woman.
In a study published in the January issue of the Journal of Forensic Sciences, Foran and colleagues compared the DNA from tissue used in the century-old trial that helped convict Hawley Crippen to that of Cora Crippens maternal relatives.
If the remains were Cora Crippens, they would share specific DNA characteristics with her current day relatives. But there was no match, said Foran, a forensic biologist and director of MSUs Forensic Science Program.
Based on the genealogical and mitochondrial DNA research, the tissue on the pathology slide used to convict Dr. Crippen was not that of Cora Crippen, Foran said. Further DNA testing showed that the tissue was male in origin.
The research team also includes Brianne Kiley and Carrie Jackson from MSU and John Trestrail, whos now retired from the Center for the Study of Criminal Poisoning in Grand Rapids.
To learn more, read the study and a previous special report on the Crippen case.
Explore further: Explainer: How to solve a jewel heist (and why it takes so long)