Lunar water may have come from comets - scientists
The image of the moon is courtesy of NASA.
Water on the Moon came in large part from comets which bombarded the lunar surface in its infancy, a study published on Sunday suggests.
For decades, the Moon was thought to have been as dry as it was void of life and atmosphere.
This assumption, though, has been revisited after findings by NASA last year of significant traces of frozen water in a permanently shadowed crater.
Astrophysicists led by James Greenwood of Wesleyan University in Connecticut analysed rock samples collected during the Apollo expeditions, looking in particular at variations in hydrogen isotopes in a water-loving mineral called apatite.
The signature, they say, points to three potential sources: from the sub-surface lunar mantle, from protons brought by the "solar wind" of particles blasted from the Sun -- and from comets.
The isotope measurements in the apatite were similar to those previously found in three well-known comets: Hale-Bopp, Hyakutake and Halley.
Comets have been described as frozen reservoirs of water orbiting the Sun, for they contain vast quantities of ice in their heads.
Under a "giant impact" theory dating back to the 1970s, the Moon was formed from part of Earth, after our planet collided with a space rock or planet some 4.5 billion years ago.
"Significant delivery" of cometary water occurred after the Moon-forming event, suggests Greenwood's team.
Comets also provided Earth with some of its lavish endowment of water as well as key chemicals to kickstart life, according to some hypotheses.
The paper is published online by the journal Nature Geoscience.
More information: http://www.nature. … geo1050.html
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Scotland passes turbine test to harness tidal power,
41 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
8 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
8 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
8 hours ago |
4.4 / 5 (10) |
0
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
8 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
0
Dragon makes history with space station docking
The private company SpaceX made history Friday with the docking of its Dragon capsule to the International Space Station, the most impressive feat yet in turning routine spaceflight over to the commercial ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
23 hours ago |
4.9 / 5 (9) |
0
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts
Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.
Transvaginal mesh op restores pelvic organ prolapse at price
(HealthDay) -- Transvaginal mesh (TVM) procedures are effective for anatomical restoration of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but patients report a worsening of sexual function following surgery, according to ...
Travel to high altitudes tied to Crohn's, colitis flare-ups
(HealthDay) -- People with inflammatory bowel disease, which includes Crohn's disease and colitis, may be at increased risk for flare-ups when they fly or travel to high altitudes for skiing or mountain climbing, ...
Jan 10, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
1. So comets existed 4.5 billion years ago[infancy of moon]. Why are they still around because as far as I know no comet lasts for more than a few hundred years at best.
There is no Oort cloud that we can detect with current technology and even if the reports of vapoury objects out there in the outer reaches of space is true, there is far too few to give the right number and size of comets required to show up here.
2. How long would water last on the moon? 4.5 billion years? With such a low gravity? Maybe there's a way to keep the water trapped that I've not considered. Or maybe it's only on a side that never gets any sun?
3. Just how do we know that comets provided earth with some of it's water? Is there any substantiating evidence for this? Or is this simply a guess-o-fact?
4. Just how many miracles does it take? First the giant impact [for which no evidence exists] then the comet[s] smashing into the moon?
Jan 10, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
Have fun guys.
Jan 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Halley's comet (and all others) would beg to differ.
2. There is no side of the moon that never gets any sun (only a side of the moon that always faces earth and one that doesn't). Although there may be parts that are shelterd from direct sunlight. with no atmosphere to disperse the heat any part that is continually in shadow (e.g. an overhang or a cave) is permanently below freezing point for water. Sublimation can still lead to loss of water.
3. Prevalence of isotopes in comets/asteroids and earthbound water (though that ratio points more to asteroids than to comets)
4. None. Miracles don't occur beause we live in a real universe. If you look the composition of the moon and the earth they are rather similar - leading to a theory about a common origin (e.g. by giant impact). It would be highly unlikely that two so similar objects just happened to be caught in a newtonian lock by chance.
Jan 10, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
I think we all know that as far as your knowledge goes that it barely registers on the nano-scale.
Jan 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
It is very likely that the impactor that created the moon came from L4 or L5 - these are stable enough to have accumulated a lot of mass when planets were forming, and the best models of the moon formation involve a low-speed collision implying something in a similar orbit to earth's orbit.
The are many comet-like bodies in the Kupier belt, with Pluto being one of the biggest known. These orbits are stable over long periods (billions of years) until passing stars nudge them into resonance with inner planets, destabilize orbits and letting them trickle in.
You could find these things out for yourself, Kevin, by keeping an open mind while reading.