Facebook raises $1B more from non US investors

Jan 21, 2011 By BARBARA ORTUTAY , AP Technology Writer

(AP) -- Facebook said Friday it has raised $1 billion from non-U.S. investors, which combined with an infusion from Goldman Sachs and Russia's Digital Sky Technologies in December, brings the haul from its latest round of funding to $1.5 billion.

The investments value the social networking site at $50 billion, more than the current market values of Yahoo Inc. or eBay Inc., but below those of Amazon.com Inc. and Google Inc.

Facebook did not say Friday how it plans to spend the $1.5 billion.

The company, which is based in Palo Alto, Calif., had the option to raise up to $1.5 billion from non-U.S. investors through Goldman, but limited the offering to $1 billion. Spokesman Jonny Thaw declined to comment further on the decision to limit the offering, which was oversubscribed - meaning more people wanted in than got in.

Earlier this week, Goldman said it was barring U.S. investors from taking part in the Facebook offering, citing widespread media coverage that could have violated securities guidelines that govern private placements.

The investments are in Facebook's Class A shares. The company's Class B shares, held by executives and early employees hold 10 times the voting power of the Class A stock. Facebook created its dual-class stock structure in 2009 to give CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other executives control over the company. Google has a similar structure.

As anticipated, Facebook also said it will start filing public financial reports by April 30, 2012. While that doesn't technically mean an initial public stock offering, that is the most likely outcome because Facebook will have to make many of the same disclosures of a publicly traded company anyway.

The specific date for filing financial reports comes because the company expects to have more than 500 shareholders by the end of April this year. Once that happens, the Securities and Exchange Commission requires it to disclose its financial results and other details on a quarterly basis so that its investors are adequately informed.

That requirement kicks in 120 days after the first fiscal year in which a company exceeds the 500 shareholder threshold. Since Facebook's fiscal year ends Dec. 31, the latest possible date would be April 30, 2012.

It was the 500-shareholder rule that prompted Google Inc. to go public in the summer of 2004. If Facebook follows a similar timeline, its IPO could come during the summer of 2012.

Explore further: Out-of-patience investors sell off Amazon

3 /5 (4 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

What could Facebook have to hide?

Jan 14, 2011

In a controversial move deemed either shrewd or unfair -- depending on whom you ask -- investment firm Goldman Sachs recently invested $450 million in the high-profile, world-changer Facebook. The deal provides Facebook with ...

US probe after Goldman investment in Facebook

Jan 05, 2011

A Goldman Sachs investment of nearly half a billion dollars into Facebook has spawned a probe by US regulators eager to safeguard the dividing line between public and private companies, The Wall Street Journal r ...

Wall Street divided over Facebook prospects

Jan 09, 2011

Wall Street sentiment is mixed over Facebook's financial prospects as the privately held social-networking website faces a possible entry into the market next year.

US clients excluded from Facebook offering: report

Jan 17, 2011

Citing "intense media attention," Goldman Sachs has decided to exclude US clients from the private offering of as much as $1.5 billion in shares of Facebook, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday.

Facebook finds powerful 'friend' in Goldman: report

Jan 03, 2011

Social-networking giant Facebook could flex its growing might after reportedly raising 500 million dollars from Goldman Sachs and a Russian firm in a deal valuing the website at 50 billion dollars.

SEC rule likely to trigger Facebook IPO in 2012

Jan 07, 2011

(AP) -- With so many investors becoming fans of the company, Facebook will be legally required to begin sharing more information about its finances and strategy by April 2012, according to documents distributed ...

Recommended for you

Out-of-patience investors sell off Amazon

17 hours ago

Amazon has long acted like an ideal customer on its own website: a freewheeling big spender with no worries about balancing a checkbook. Investors confident in founder and CEO Jeff Bezos' invest-and-expand ...

States ascend into the cloud

23 hours ago

Seven years ago, the state of Delaware started moving computer servers out of closets and from under workers' desks to create a consolidated data center and a virtual computing climate.

Microsoft drops Nokia name from smartphones

Oct 24, 2014

Microsoft said Friday it was dropping the Nokia name from its Lumia smartphones, rebranding following the acquisition earlier this year of the Finnish group's handset division.

Amazon's loss makes holidays a question mark

Oct 24, 2014

Amazon's trademark smile icon is becoming more of a grimace. The world's largest online retailer reported a wider third-quarter loss than analysts expected and gave a disappointing holiday forecast.

User comments : 10

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Sinister181
not rated yet Jan 22, 2011
Great. More cash into Zuckerberg's pocket.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Jan 22, 2011
Now govt regulations are driving investors overseas.
Skeptic_Heretic
not rated yet Jan 22, 2011
Now govt regulations are driving investors overseas.

Goldman Sachs limited the offering, not the SEC. Try reading the articles before you post.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Jan 23, 2011
Now govt regulations are driving investors overseas.

Goldman Sachs limited the offering, not the SEC. Try reading the articles before you post.

"barring U.S. investors from taking part in the Facebook offering, citing widespread media coverage that could have violated securities guidelines that govern private placements."
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Jan 23, 2011
Now govt regulations are driving investors overseas.

Goldman Sachs limited the offering, not the SEC. Try reading the articles before you post.

"barring U.S. investors from taking part in the Facebook offering, citing widespread media coverage that could have violated securities guidelines that govern private placements."

"the Securities and Exchange Commission has guidelines that regulate the amount of solicitation and publicity that is allowed in connection with a private placement."
http:/news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_facebook_investors
Another example of how regulators stifle. Better to avoid any potential problems rather than suffer the potential litigation.
Skeptic_Heretic
not rated yet Jan 23, 2011
Wasn't a problem with google. This is called lying through the regulations. Goldman is famous for playing these games to control their future financial outlooks. You'd rather remove the regulations in total allowing absolute abuse of financial registers.

You need to learn how the real world works.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Jan 23, 2011
Wasn't a problem with google. This is called lying through the regulations. Goldman is famous for playing these games to control their future financial outlooks. You'd rather remove the regulations in total allowing absolute abuse of financial registers.

You need to learn how the real world works.

Then the SEC should sue for liable.
In the real world, your statism has unintended as well as intended consequences. Both of which can be detrimental to prosperity.
Skeptic_Heretic
not rated yet Jan 23, 2011
Then the SEC should sue for liable.
In the real world, your statism has unintended as well as intended consequences. Both of which can be detrimental to prosperity.
Better than anarchy, where every consequence is intended, regardless of whether people suffer or not.
poof
not rated yet Jan 24, 2011
What the hell is a social web site going to do with a billion dollars?
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Jan 24, 2011
Then the SEC should sue for liable.
In the real world, your statism has unintended as well as intended consequences. Both of which can be detrimental to prosperity.
Better than anarchy, where every consequence is intended, regardless of whether people suffer or not.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.