Little evidence to support most eHealth technologies, such as electronic patient records

Jan 18, 2011

Despite the wide endorsement of and support for eHealth technologies, such as electronic patient records and e-prescribing, the scientific basis of its benefits -- which are repeatedly made and often uncritically accepted -- remains to be firmly established.

Furthermore, even for the eHealth technologies that have proven to be successful, there is little evidence to show that such tools would continue to be successful beyond the contexts in which they were originally developed. These are the key findings of a study by Aziz Sheikh (University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland) and colleagues, and published in this week's .

In the study, the authors systematically reviewed the published systematic review literature on eHealth technologies and evaluated the impact of these technologies on the quality and safety of . The 53 reviews (out of 108), that the authors selected according to their criteria and critically reviewed, provided the main evidence base for assessing the impact of eHealth technologies in three categories: 1) storing, managing, and transmission of data, such as ; 2) clinical decision support, such as e-prescribing; and 3) facilitating care from a distance, such as telehealthcare devices.

The authors found that the evidence base in support of eHealth technologies was weak and inconsistent and, importantly, that there is insubstantial evidence to support the cost-effectiveness of these technologies. They also found some evidence that introducing these new technologies may sometimes generate new risks, such as prescribing practitioners becoming over-reliant on clinical decision support for e-prescribing or overestimate its functionality, resulting in decreased practitioner performance.

The authors conclude, "in the light of the paucity of evidence in relation to improvements in patient outcomes, as well as the lack of evidence on their cost-effectiveness, it is vital that future eHealth technologies are evaluated against a comprehensive set of measures, ideally throughout all stages of the technology's life cycle." They add: "Such evaluation should be characterised by careful attention to socio-technical factors to maximise the likelihood of successful implementation and adoption."

Explore further: AMA: Gender inequality still exists in medicine

More information: Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K, et al. (2011) The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview. PLoS Med 8(1): e1000387. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Physicians click their way to better prescriptions

Mar 10, 2010

Is it time for all community-based doctors to turn to e-prescribing to cut down on the number of medication errors? According to Rainu Kaushal and colleagues from the Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, electronic ...

IT can help CVD management

Aug 24, 2010

Robyn Whittaker from the University of Auckland and colleagues argue that information technology (IT)-based programs can improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) management and patient empowerment, but must be accompanied by ...

Airport security measures not backed by solid evidence

Dec 21, 2007

There is no solid evidence that the huge amounts of money spent on airport security screening measures since September 11th are effective, argue researchers in this week’s Christmas issue of the BMJ.

Recommended for you

New medical device to make the mines safer

Nov 21, 2014

Dehydration can be a serious health issue for Australia's mining industry, but a new product to be developed with input from Flinders University's Medical Device Partnering Program (MDPP) is set to more effectively ...

US family gets $6.75 million in Botox case

Nov 20, 2014

A New York couple who said Botox treatment of their son's cerebral palsy left him with life-threatening complications and sued its manufacturer won a $6.75 million verdict from a federal jury on Thursday.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dogbert
not rated yet Jan 18, 2011
The federal government has been pushing these technologies for years and spending millions of dollars encouraging the adoption of electronic records with no clear benefit.

ironjustice
not rated yet Jan 22, 2011
Quote: millions of dollars encouraging the adoption of electronic records with no clear benefit
Answer: I may depend on WHO is DOING the 'no clear benefit' investigation. Someone did an investigation of the prescribing of commercial dialysis operations and found they prescribe a great deal more than nonprofit dialysis centers. Another investigation which could / should be easily done with patient prescribing records is those doctors who work in the gastroenterology field. There is a theory as to WHY the ulcer cure by Dr. Marshall was so long in being implemented by some doctors and NOT implemented by others. The theory is since ninety percent of ulcers are said to be curable with Dr. Marshalls' antibiotic protocol the gastroenterologists are NOT prescribing the cure because a cure will put them out of business. An electronic record of WHO prescribes WHAT would easily show whether a patient prescribed ulcer drugs has EVER been tested for the cure.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.