Drug's likelihood of causing birth defects predicted by model

January 10, 2011 By Keri Stedman

(PhysOrg.com) -- When pregnant women need medications, there is often concern about possible effects on the fetus. Although some drugs are clearly recognized to cause birth defects (thalidomide being a notorious example), and others are generally recognized as safe, surprisingly little is known about most drugs’ level of risk.

Harvard researchers in the Children’s Hospital Boston Informatics Program (CHIP) have created a preclinical model for predicting a drug’s teratogenicity (tendency to cause fetal malformations) based on characterizing the genes that it targets.

The model, described in the March 2011 issue of Reproductive Toxicology (published online in November), used bioinformatics and public databases to profile 619 drugs already assigned to a pregnancy risk class, and whose target genes or proteins are known. For each of the genes targeted, 7,426 in all, CHIP investigators Asher Schachter and Isaac Kohane crunched databases to identify genes involved in biological processes related to fetal development, looking for telltale search terms such as “genesis,” “develop,” “differentiate,” or “growth.”

The researchers found that drugs targeting a large proportion of genes associated with fetal development tended to be in the higher risk classes. Based on the developmental gene profile, they created a model that showed 79 percent accuracy in predicting whether a drug would be in Class A (safest) or Class X (known teratogen).

For example, the cholesterol-lowering drugs cerivastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and fluvastatin are all in Class X. All of these drugs also targeted very high proportions of high-risk genes (98 to 100 percent). The anti-coagulant warfarin, also in Class X, had a proportion of 88 percent.

When Schachter and Kohane applied the model to drugs across all risk classes, the proportion of developmental genes targeted roughly matched the degree of known risk. However, the model needs further validation before Schachter is willing to share actual predictions for specific drugs. “We don’t want to risk misleading from taking necessary medicines,” he says.

One difficulty in validating the model is that the “known” teratogenicity it’s being tested against often isn’t known. Between Class A and Class X are Classes B, C, and D, with increasing amounts of risk, but the boundaries between them are based on minimal data. Teratogenic effects may be difficult to spot, since most drugs are taken relatively rarely in pregnancy, some may be taken along with other drugs, and any effects tend to be rare or too subtle to be noted in medical records. Moreover, data from animal testing doesn’t necessarily apply to humans.

“A lot of drugs in the middle of the spectrum, and maybe even some in Class A, may cause subtle defects that we haven’t detected,” says Schachter. “We can’t provide a yes/no answer, but we found a pattern that can predict which are riskier.”

Given the degree of uncertainty, Schachter and Kohane believe their model may be of interest to drug developers and prescribing physicians, and might provide useful information to incorporate in drug labeling.

“We can now say to patients, ‘This drug targets a ton of that are involved in developmental processes,’” says Schachter, assistant professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School (HMS).

Or, conversely, if a young pregnant woman has a heart condition and needs to be treated, physicians may be reassured by a cardiac drug’s profile, he adds. “Instead of saying, ‘we don’t know,’ we can now say that the drug is more likely to be safe in pregnancy.”

“We have here a prismatic example of the utility of a big-picture, macrobiological approach,” says Kohane, CHIP director and Lawrence J. Henderson Professor of Pediatrics at HMS. “By combining a comprehensive database of protein targets of drugs and a database of associated with drugs, we find a promising predictive model of drug risk for birth defects.”

Explore further: Broken bones and medication

Related Stories

Broken bones and medication

October 5, 2010

Although one in four women over 50 develops osteoporosis, most are unaware they have the disease — something Professor Suzanne Cadarette would like to change.

Modern society made up of all types

November 4, 2010

Modern society has an intense interest in classifying people into ‘types’, according to a University of Melbourne Cultural Historian, leading to potentially catastrophic life-changing outcomes for those typed – ...

Busting drug law fears

November 25, 2010

Portugal's decision to decriminalise all drug use did not lead to dramatic increases in drug abuse or drug-related harm, a joint Australian and UK study has found.

Sensitive testosterone detector linked to less aggression

December 3, 2010

Questionnaire results and DNA samples volunteered by a group of University of Alberta students has broken new ground in the study of aggression. U of A Psychology researcher Peter Hurd was looking at the link between an individual’s ...

More ear infections in teens with smoker at home

December 7, 2010

Family members who smoke are more apt to feel it is OK to smoke indoors as their children get older. But in households with secondhand smoke, children between 12 and 17 are 1.67 times more prone to have recurrent ear infections ...

Model predicts a drug's likelihood of causing birth defects

January 4, 2011

When pregnant women need medications, there is often concern about possible effects on the fetus. Although some drugs are clearly recognized to cause birth defects (thalidomide being a notorious example), and others are generally ...

Recommended for you

How the finch changes its tune

August 3, 2015

Like top musicians, songbirds train from a young age to weed out errors and trim variability from their songs, ultimately becoming consistent and reliable performers. But as with human musicians, even the best are not machines. ...

Machine Translates Thoughts into Speech in Real Time

December 21, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- By implanting an electrode into the brain of a person with locked-in syndrome, scientists have demonstrated how to wirelessly transmit neural signals to a speech synthesizer. The "thought-to-speech" process ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.