Denmark, Finland and Belgium have best democracies: study

January 27, 2011

A new democracy barometer from the University of Zurich and the Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) shows the development of the thirty best democracies in the world. Den-mark, Finland and Belgium have the highest quality of democracy, whereas Great Britain, France, Poland, South Africa and Costa Rica the lowest. Moreover, the barometer shows no evidence of a crisis of democracy.

Diagnoses of a crisis of are as old as democracy itself; they are a common theme in the political discourse of the Western world. However, until now there was no instrument that allowed a systematic measurement of the quality and stability of democracy in highly developed across national borders and over long periods of time. A democracy barometer that has analyzed the development of the most important aspects of the world's thirty foremost democracies since 1990 has now been presented at the University of Zurich.

The barometer uses 100 empirical indicators to measure how well a country complies with the three democratic principles of freedom, equality and control as well as the nine basic functions of democ-racy. The comparison of thirty established democracies between 1995 and 2005 has revealed that Denmark is leading the way, followed by Finland and Belgium. "In the comparison, the lowest quality is exhibited by the democracies in Poland, South Africa and Costa Rica," says Marc Bühlmann from the University of Zurich. While Italy, as might be expected, finds itself towards the bottom end of the scale, it is surprising that Great Britain (26th) and France (27th) are also so far down the ranking. Equally surprising is the fact that Switzerland (14th) is only mediocre and lags behind 11th- placed Germany.

Quality of democracy on the rise

The democracy barometer can also be used to measure the quality of democratic systems over time. "There was, however, no evidence of an overall crisis or a decline in the quality of democracy," according to Bühlmann. Quite the contrary: if the quality of democracy in all thirty countries is seen as a whole, an increase in the quality of democracy from 1995 to 2000 can be observed and, despite a slight dip again between 2000 and 2005, it is still at a higher level in 2005 than in 1995. Consideration of the individual countries reveals that nine democracies exhibit a lower quality than in 1995 (ITA, CZE, POR, USA, CRC, FRA, IRL, AUS and GER), whereas the quality of democracy has risen in the remaining twenty-one countries.

The democracy barometer registers the differences in the quality of political participation, representa-tion and transparency as well as those concerning the rule of law, individual liberties or the ability of a government to actually implement democratic decisions. If the countries are viewed as a whole, an increase in the quality of transparency and representation becomes apparent, but so does a slight decline in the rule of law. The positive trend can be attributed – among other things – to the ever-better integration of women in the political process and the increase in transparency virtually forced into being by citizens, audit divisions, ombudsmen, NGOs and the media. On the other hand, the rule of law is losing ground due to an increasing unequal treatment of minorities. Here, too, there are ma-jor differences between the individual countries. Positive developments are apparent in younger de-mocracies such as South Africa and Cyprus, which are making up a lot of ground in terms of develop-ing and protecting personal liberties, whilst a decline was evident in George W. Bush's America and Silvio Berlusconi's Italy.

"Democracy is still a work in progress," say the two project leaders Marc Bühlmann (Zurich) and Prof. Wolfgang Merkel (Berlin). Sustainable democratization is needed, even in established democracies." Our democracy barometer shows the strengths and weaknesses of the democracies in the individual . But it also reveals where progress and success have been achieved and where it is worth studying the best practices of successful democracies more closely," say Merkel und Bühlmann.

Country comparison (average quality of democracy 1995-2005):

Denmark: 88.3
Finland: 87.7
Belgium: 85.1
Iceland: 83.5
Sweden: 82.9
Norway: 82.1
Canada: 79.4
Netherlands: 79.0
Luxembourg: 75.2
USA: 74.9
Germany: 73.2
New Zealand: 72.1
Slovenia: 69.6
Switzerland: 67.8
Ireland: 67.0
Portugal: 66.7
Spain: 66.6
Australia: 65.5
Hungary: 63.2
Austria: 63.1
Czech Republic: 58.2
Italy: 57.0
Cyprus: 55.5
Malta: 54.2
Japan: 45.8
Great Britain: 44.6
France: 42.8
Poland: 42.0
South Africa: 39.8
Costa Rica: 32.7

Provided by University of Zurich

4.8 /5 (12 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Yellowdart
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Hey, the USA isnt a democracy...It's a democratic republic!! :)

In all seriousness, why is control listed as one of their criteria?

The whole point of democracy is to empower the people to pursue life liberty and happiness, not to control them or do all those things for them.

Or is that how they are attempting to measure decline?
Quantum_Conundrum
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Anyone notice that, with very few exceptions, the more progressive a country is the worse it rates on this scale.

It would be interesting to see how the relative ranking on this scale correlates to relative ranking on things like crime, poverty, inflation, GDP, debt/deficit as a % of GDP, etc...

Only one democracy, South AFrica, is in the top 10 per capita murder rate, while two more democracies are 19th and 20th, being Poland and Costa Rica. All three of these nations rated dead last on the above scale.

It should be pointed out that the U.S. is 24th worst nation in per capita murder rate, and 4th worst democracy in per capita murder rate.

However, it doesn't corellate well, because Great Britain, Japan, and France have very low per capita murder rates. France is only 1/3rd as bad as the U.S., while Britain is slightly better than them, but Japan has ten times less murder per capita than the U.S.

At least they are protecting the "right to life"...
geokstr
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
Hey, the USA isnt a democracy...It's a democratic republic!! :)

In all seriousness, why is control listed as one of their criteria?

The whole point of democracy is to empower the people to pursue life liberty and happiness, not to control them or do all those things for them.

Or is that how they are attempting to measure decline?

This "study" is probably weighted towards "social democracy" as being the barometer of perfection, as practiced in Europe, not a republic designed to protect the liberty of the individual. They don't much believe in the rights of the individual over there like "equality under the law" and "freedom of speech", with the "right to bear arms" being especially odious. "Social rights" and "social justice" are way more important concepts to them.

Note the criticism of the Bush era, which was no less transparent that the Obama era, where nearly all of Bush's policies have been adopted.
jjoensuu
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
yea I have been wondering about the reason and motivation of this an that other recent report, the one ranking countries by "happiness" (in which Finland and Denmark also where listed near the top). Just makes me wonder because I happen to be from one of those countries...
Phideaux
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I don't see how anyone can doubt that personal liberty took a shellacking under the Bush administration. The question is was (or is) it justified for reasons of national security.
Paljor
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I have also heard that dennmark is one of the safest countries in the world.
geokstr
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
I don't see how anyone can doubt that personal liberty took a shellacking under the Bush administration. The question is was (or is) it justified for reasons of national security.

Perhaps you can tell us all the myriad ways in which your personal liberty took a shellacking?

And how it's improved so much under Obama, who has mainly continued all the policies under Bush.
bg1
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Anyone notice that, with very few exceptions, the more progressive a country is the worse it rates on this scale....


You've got it backwards, the countries at the top of the list are the most socialist.
Quantum_Conundrum
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
bgt:

Honestly there aren't as many correlations as I first thought.

It is weird that regardless of where a country ranks on this list, most of the more socialist democracies have much lower murder rates than the U.S., including several that rank near the bottom of this list, but also certainly including denmark.

Maybe social or fiscal extremes help prevent murder, while "moderate" counries don't do enough...
Yellowdart
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Maybe social or fiscal extremes help prevent murder, while "moderate" counries don't do enough...


Well, there is that whole iRobot idea that if you quarantine everyone, they obviously cant murder one another.
Yellowdart
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I don't see how anyone can doubt that personal liberty took a shellacking under the Bush administration. The question is was (or is) it justified for reasons of national security.

Perhaps you can tell us all the myriad ways in which your personal liberty took a shellacking?

And how it's improved so much under Obama, who has mainly continued all the policies under Bush.


In the hands of someone responsible, the Patriot Act is seen as a good thing. However, the danger of it is when, someone else uses that power for ill intentions.

In other words, Bush may have only actually used it against terrorists, leaving all other aspects alone. However, those under him may not have, or had we elected the next "Hitler" what they would use that same power for instead?

That is the prime danger in such an act. I'm not sure it was worth that risk.
sstritt
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
I have also heard that dennmark is one of the safest countries in the world.

Unless you draw a cartoon of Mohammed. :-)


ryggesogn2
Jan 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
the ability of a government to actually implement democratic decisions.

Does this mean that in a 'good' democracy 51% can control 49% of the population?

Except for Belgium, the top 'democracies' are all quite homogeneous and small. This enables social pressures, customs and norms to have more influence than the state. If US states were broken out in this study, I bet the smaller, more homogeneous rural states would be tops on the list.
Eikka
Jan 28, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)

Does this mean that in a 'good' democracy 51% can control 49% of the population?


In the previous elections in Finland, the turnaround was 67.9% from a voting population of roughly 75% which turns around to just about 50.9% of the whole population.

Though if you count the three major parties in the parliament who collectively got 66.8% of the votes and 73% of the seats, it seems that only 34% of the people could make any meaningful impact on the actual politics through the way they chose to vote.

Though the actual political system in Finland works through a system where you vote for a person but the votes get pooled for the party, so who actually gets elected depends on the party itself, and the policies aren't necessarily decided by the people you chose to vote, but according to the party line which follows its own internal hierarchy and politics. It's known as "party dicipline".

So one could argue that overall, it matters very little how people vote in Finland.
Eikka
Jan 28, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
And that fact is evident in the rhetorics of the Finnish members of the parliament themselves. They consider themselves as "deciders" instead of "representatives".

All in all, they have extensive suverenity in how the country is run, and many of the decisions are done in closed cabinets and only released to the public when they're about to implement them, which is considered a major problem by the people. The ministers on the other hand seem to openly regard the public feedback as a nuisance.

Bog_Mire
Jan 28, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
I found the Danes, Belgians and Fins a bit wound up and depressed. Maybe it was the weather.
geokstr
Jan 28, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
In the hands of someone responsible, the Patriot Act is seen as a good thing. However, the danger of it is when, someone else uses that power for ill intentions.

In other words, Bush may have only actually used it against terrorists, leaving all other aspects alone. However, those under him may not have, or had we elected the next "Hitler" what they would use that same power for instead?

That is the prime danger in such an act. I'm not sure it was worth that risk.

But your initial comment claimed that personal liberty had taken a shellacking under Bush. Your clarification is much more moderated, and unfortunately, applies to a lot of laws/regulations on the books today.

For instance, "net neutrality" has very modest aims, according to Genachowsky's FCC, but is it worth the risk, considering that it opens the door to content control? And Obama has asked for power to shut down the internet for "emergencies". Do you see any dangers here as well? Hint: look at Egypt right now.
ryggesogn2
Jan 28, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
The ministers on the other hand seem to openly regard the public feedback as a nuisance.

So do most US members of Congress.
I found the Danes, Belgians and Fins a bit wound up and depressed. Maybe it was the weather.

Maybe it was the lack of economic opportunity and merit based salaries.
technicalengeneering
Jan 28, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
They cannot be serious about Belgium being a democracy. Yes they are civilised and yes they live in a modern and free country but it's not democratic. Not because no one listens to the people but because they do. The next thing that happens is them breaking the world record of not agreeing with each other.
Daein
Jan 30, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
This certainly isn't a measure of freedom.
Rank 4.8 /5 (12 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Consumption rivalry
    created20 hours ago
  • Bilateral trade between all countries
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Is the economic foundation of social media in jeopardy?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • Psychology: Rosenthal and Hawthorne Effect
    createdMay 15, 2012
  • Is GDP and National Income the Same Thing?
    createdMay 13, 2012
  • Difference between hourly wage and real GDP per hour worked?
    createdMay 12, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Social Sciences

More news stories

Math predicts size of clot-forming cells

UC Davis mathematicians have helped biologists figure out why platelets, the cells that form blood clots, are the size and shape that they are. Because platelets are important both for healing wounds and in strokes and other ...

Other Sciences / Mathematics

created 21 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (11) | comments 88

Ancient Bethlehem seal unearthed in Jerusalem

Israeli archaeologists have discovered a 2,700-year-old seal that bears the inscription "Bethlehem," the Israel Antiquities Authority announced Wednesday, in what experts believe to be the oldest artifact ...

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3.5 / 5 (13) | comments 22

Oldest Jewish archaeological evidence on the Iberian Peninsula

German archaeologists of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena found one of the oldest archaeological evidence so far of Jewish Culture on the Iberian Peninsula at an excavation site in the south of Portugal, ...

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (4) | comments 12

Dollars and sense: Why are some people morally against tax?

As the U.S. presidential election campaigns heat up, the economic debate is dominated by bailouts, austerity and, inevitably, taxation. Now a new study published in Symbolic Interaction asks why tax is such an important issue ...

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3 / 5 (2) | comments 12


SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity

(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...

Transvaginal mesh op restores pelvic organ prolapse at price

(HealthDay) -- Transvaginal mesh (TVM) procedures are effective for anatomical restoration of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but patients report a worsening of sexual function following surgery, according to ...

Travel to high altitudes tied to Crohn's, colitis flare-ups

(HealthDay) -- People with inflammatory bowel disease, which includes Crohn's disease and colitis, may be at increased risk for flare-ups when they fly or travel to high altitudes for skiing or mountain climbing, ...

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit

Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.