New CPR technique for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increases survival by 53 percent

Jan 18, 2011

A study led by Dr. Tom P. Aufderheide, professor of emergency medicine at The Medical College of Wisconsin, shows an alternative method of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation increases long-term survival of patients.

The study, which is published in the January 19th, 2011 online version of Lancet, and will be in an upcoming publication of Lancet, determined that active compression-decompression cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure gave patients a better chance of survival. When the pressure inside the thorax decreases, blood flow to the heart and brain increases.

About 800,000 people in the U.S., Canada and Europe have an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest every year. The survival rate averages just 5%, in part because standard CPR is inefficient, providing just 25% of healthy blood flow to the heart and brain.

In the randomized study, 46 emergency medical service (EMS) agencies in urban, suburban and rural areas of the USA, including EMS in Oshkosh, provided either standard CPR or the new technique to adults who had a non-traumatic arrest presumed cardiac in nature.

The new technique uses two devices simultaneously to increase circulation. One is a handheld device that attaches with a small suction cup to the patient's chest. After each compression, the suction cup allows the chest to be lifted up, stimulating blood flow. The second device, called an impedance threshold device, attaches to the patient's airway using a facial mask or . When the chest lifts upward, the impedance threshold device prevents air from rushing into the lungs. That creates a vacuum inside the chest and helps refill the heart after each compression. Researchers found in each compression-decompression cycle, the heart and brain receive nearly three times more when compared with standard CPR.

A total of 813 standard CPR patients and 840 intervention patients were analyzed in the study. Researchers found 6% of the standards CPR patients survived to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic function. That compares with 9% in the intervention group (improvement of survival chance 53% in intervention group). The same proportions of patients in each group survived to one year.

"Based on our findings, active compression-decompression CPR with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure should be considered as an alternative to standard CPR to increase long-term survival after ," said Dr. Aufderheide.

Explore further: Supplement maker admits lying about ingredients

Related Stories

New studies confirm chest compressions alone

Dec 26, 2007

Two large-scale studies published in the Dec. 18 issue of the American Heart Association’s medical journal, Circulation, report that the chances of surviving cardiac arrest are no better – and may be worse – when b ...

Recommended for you

Supplement maker admits lying about ingredients

18 hours ago

Federal prosecutors say the owner and president of a dietary supplement company has admitted his role in the sale of diluted and adulterated dietary ingredients and supplements sold by his company.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

napdaw
3 / 5 (2) Jan 19, 2011
I'm wondering about the ethics on this study. They surely didn't get consent to decide who to use the new technique on - since it was a live ore death situation and if they had a good idea that the new technique worked better, I bet the families of those who just used CPR are thinking my loved ones could still be alive if the EMS had chosen to intervene differently.
jtdrexel
3 / 5 (2) Jan 19, 2011
when the person is dying and not about to respond, you automatically get consent to save the person's life. this does not seem like it would be a big ethical issue if this new method only increases the chances of survival!
trekgeek1
5 / 5 (2) Jan 19, 2011
One is a handheld device that attaches with a small suction cup to the patient's chest.


This is why I always carry a plunger with me. They called me crazy, but who's crazy now!
tkjtkj
not rated yet Jan 20, 2011

This is why I always carry a plunger with me. They called me crazy, but who's crazy now!


cool, but that's only half of number of needed devices: you'll also have to carry a sock to be intermittently stuffed in a throat at each uplift of the plunger .. THEN you might call yourself 'prepared!'

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.