Citing rights failings, firm divests Cisco holdings

Jan 12, 2011
A US investment management firm has divested of its holdings in Cisco, accusing the networking giant of failing to respond to human rights concerns, particularly in China, and lacking transparency.

A US investment management firm has divested of its holdings in Cisco, accusing the networking giant of failing to respond to human rights concerns, particularly in China, and lacking transparency.

Boston Common Asset Management cited Cisco's marketing of equipment to the Chinese Ministry of Public Security among the reasons for its decision to sell its stock in the San Jose, California-based company.

"Boston Common's decision to divest comes after years of campaigning for greater transparency and accountability on key and business development concerns," Boston Common's Dawn Wolfe said in a statement.

"Politically and socially repressive policies related to speech and privacy has a chilling effect on users and violates universally recognized human rights," she said. "When pressed for details on how Cisco addresses these risks, they come up short."

Founded eight years ago, Boston Common pursues an for its clients involving "rigorous analysis of financial, environmental, social, and governance factors."

Following last year's Gulf oil spill, Boston Common, which currently has $1.4 billion under management, divested of its holdings in BP.

As of September 30, Boston Common held some 167,000 shares of Cisco stock worth $3.6 million.

Boston Common also accused Cisco of "deceptive vote tallying" on a proxy item submitted at the company's 2010 annual shareholders meeting in November.

Boston Common's proposal said that Cisco, in 1998, "was selected as a key supplier for building China's nationwide IP backbone, which has been called 'the Great Firewall of China.'"

It said that a 2002 Cisco document publicly leaked in 2008 "made clear that Cisco engineers were aware of the ’s repressive censorship and surveillance agenda and may have regarded this as a business opportunity."

Boston Common sought shareholder approval for a motion calling on Cisco to publish a report listing "concrete steps the company could reasonably take to reduce the likelihood that its business practices might enable or encourage the violation of human rights."

Cisco recommended shareholders reject the proposal and said its "business practices are designed to and strive to promote, among other things, freedom of expression, privacy and other fundamental personal freedoms.

"With respect to Internet freedom, we have clearly stated our policies: Cisco does not customize, or develop specialized or unique filtering capabilities, in order to enable different regimes to block access to information; Cisco sells the same equipment worldwide," it said.

Cisco denied the charge it manipulated the proxy vote.

"Boston Common is inaccurate in its assessment regarding the vote tally of the shareholder sponsored proposals," a Cisco spokeswoman told AFP.

"Cisco disclosed the voting results for all proposals during the annual meeting using a consistent methodology based on the percentage of shares voted," she said

Explore further: Winners and losers of the demise of the big Comcast deal

Related Stories

Cisco to buy ScanSafe for $183 million

Oct 27, 2009

Cisco announced on Tuesday it has agreed to buy Web security company ScanSafe for some 183 million dollars, the latest in a string of acquisitions by the US networking giant.

Recommended for you

How smart are the mobile shoppers who use smartphones?

15 hours ago

In the age of the smart phone, how smart are the mobile shoppers who use these almost ubiquitous devices? A study from South Korea published in the International Journal of Mobile Communications hopes to answer that questi ...

India's Infosys gives muted earnings, stock falls

16 hours ago

Indian software giant Infosys Technologies saw its shares dip nearly seven percent Friday after it reported a single digit rise in yearly revenues and also missed quarterly profit estimates.

Apple wins patent appeal in China

20 hours ago

Apple has won an appeal in China over patent rights to voice recognition software such as the iPhone's "Siri", with a court overruling an earlier decision that had gone against the US technology giant.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

pt30
not rated yet Jan 13, 2011
Since when is an investment firm interested in the practices of a company's human rights record? They're there to make money.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.