CEOs rewarded for wrong kind of growth, study finds

January 4, 2011

Growth is good, right? Not always.

But committees still tend to reward CEOs when their companies grow due to – even though that has been found to hurt long-term shareholder value – rather than only rewarding growth due to improved profitability, says a paper co-authored by a professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management.

The practice sends CEOs a message to grow at all costs, while hurting chances for companies to further improve shareholder value. Still, corporate boards may not realize what they're doing, say the study's authors.

"Most people don't look long-term," says Partha Mohanram, an associate professor of accounting at the Rotman School who also holds the CGA Ontario Professorship in Accounting, who wrote the paper with Sudhakar Balachandran of Columbia Business School. "We're not alleging these guys are doing this on purpose -- far from it. We just think this is a fallacy many people fall for."

The paper confirmed past research showing the best kind of growth for improved shareholder value comes from increased profitability, while investment-related growth destroys value.

The authors carried out their studies using a sample of companies with compensation data on Execucomp, which tracks executive compensation among the S&P 1500 listed firms. Compensation was correlated to growth and different types of growth.

Although CEOs who improved their companies' profitability were rewarded, the researchers found that those who grew through increased investment actually got greater rewards. Companies with more value-oriented institutional investors showed a stronger link between improved compensation and profitability-related growth and a negative link between compensation and investment-driven .

"It's good to grow," says Prof. Mohanram, "but you have to grow in a way that adds value for shareholders."

Explore further: Large Shareholders Impact Companies' Profitability, Policies

More information: The complete study is available at:

Related Stories

Large Shareholders Impact Companies' Profitability, Policies

September 5, 2006

Corporations can't choose their shareholders, but some might wish they could. A new study found that some large shareholders are associated with lower-than-average returns for the companies in which they invest, while other ...

Study: Benchmarks and 'leapfrogs' drive up CEO pay

May 25, 2010

Why have CEO salaries skyrocketed over the past 20 years? Much of the blame lies in the practice of compensation benchmarking, say the authors of a study to be published next week in the American Journal of Sociology.

Recommended for you

The culinary habits of the Stonehenge builders

October 13, 2015

A team of archaeologists at the University of York have revealed new insights into cuisine choices and eating habits at Durrington Walls – a Late Neolithic monument and settlement site thought to be the residence for the ...

Ancient genome from Africa sequenced for the first time

October 8, 2015

The first ancient human genome from Africa to be sequenced has revealed that a wave of migration back into Africa from Western Eurasia around 3,000 years ago was up to twice as significant as previously thought, and affected ...

Mexican site yields new details of sacrifice of Spaniards

October 9, 2015

It was one of the worst defeats in one of history's most dramatic conquests: Only a year after Hernan Cortes landed in Mexico, hundreds of people in a Spanish-led convey were captured, sacrificed and apparently eaten.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jan 04, 2011
It's not like Wall Street's going to actually pay attention to this. Investment people are the ones who sit on these boards, so they're going to reward investing, which gives them dividends *and* a cut, instead of re-investing, which only gives them dividends.
1 / 5 (1) Jan 04, 2011
If we want to talk about misplaced incentives, we should start with politicians, who are rewarded for out-of-control spending to buy votes, and the union leaders they are in bed with, whose incentive is to suck as much out of the private sector as possible, either through taxes or political favors. But of course, a professor trying to do a study about those two groups of crooks can kiss his grant money goodbye.

An individual CEO can only hurt a relatively small number of people, but politicians do things that screw the entire country, and unions are in lock step with them.
5 / 5 (1) Jan 04, 2011
"An individual CEO can only hurt a relatively small number of people" - Tard of Tards

Goldman Sachs.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.