CEOs rewarded for wrong kind of growth, study finds

Jan 04, 2011

Growth is good, right? Not always.

But committees still tend to reward CEOs when their companies grow due to – even though that has been found to hurt long-term shareholder value – rather than only rewarding growth due to improved profitability, says a paper co-authored by a professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management.

The practice sends CEOs a message to grow at all costs, while hurting chances for companies to further improve shareholder value. Still, corporate boards may not realize what they're doing, say the study's authors.

"Most people don't look long-term," says Partha Mohanram, an associate professor of accounting at the Rotman School who also holds the CGA Ontario Professorship in Accounting, who wrote the paper with Sudhakar Balachandran of Columbia Business School. "We're not alleging these guys are doing this on purpose -- far from it. We just think this is a fallacy many people fall for."

The paper confirmed past research showing the best kind of growth for improved shareholder value comes from increased profitability, while investment-related growth destroys value.

The authors carried out their studies using a sample of companies with compensation data on Execucomp, which tracks executive compensation among the S&P 1500 listed firms. Compensation was correlated to growth and different types of growth.

Although CEOs who improved their companies' profitability were rewarded, the researchers found that those who grew through increased investment actually got greater rewards. Companies with more value-oriented institutional investors showed a stronger link between improved compensation and profitability-related growth and a negative link between compensation and investment-driven .

"It's good to grow," says Prof. Mohanram, "but you have to grow in a way that adds value for shareholders."

Explore further: Retail pricing strategies: Do consumers prefer deep discounts or everyday low prices?

More information: The complete study is available at: www.rotman.utoronto.ca/newthin… execcompMohanram.pdf

Provided by University of Toronto, Rotman School of Management

4 /5 (6 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Large Shareholders Impact Companies' Profitability, Policies

Sep 05, 2006

Corporations can't choose their shareholders, but some might wish they could. A new study found that some large shareholders are associated with lower-than-average returns for the companies in which they invest, while other ...

Study: Benchmarks and 'leapfrogs' drive up CEO pay

May 25, 2010

Why have CEO salaries skyrocketed over the past 20 years? Much of the blame lies in the practice of compensation benchmarking, say the authors of a study to be published next week in the American Journal of Sociology.

Recommended for you

P90X? Why consumers choose high-effort products

14 hours ago

Stuck in traffic? On hold for what seems like an eternity? Consumers often face situations that undermine their feelings of control. According to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research, when a person's sense of con ...

Overdoing it: Multiple perspectives confuse consumers

15 hours ago

Television commercials for luxury vehicles pack a lot in their 30-second running times: the camera offers quick shots of the soft leather upholstery, the shiny colors, the state-of-the-art entertainment system, ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jamey
not rated yet Jan 04, 2011
It's not like Wall Street's going to actually pay attention to this. Investment people are the ones who sit on these boards, so they're going to reward investing, which gives them dividends *and* a cut, instead of re-investing, which only gives them dividends.
geokstr
1 / 5 (1) Jan 04, 2011
If we want to talk about misplaced incentives, we should start with politicians, who are rewarded for out-of-control spending to buy votes, and the union leaders they are in bed with, whose incentive is to suck as much out of the private sector as possible, either through taxes or political favors. But of course, a professor trying to do a study about those two groups of crooks can kiss his grant money goodbye.

An individual CEO can only hurt a relatively small number of people, but politicians do things that screw the entire country, and unions are in lock step with them.
Vendicar_Decarian
5 / 5 (1) Jan 04, 2011
"An individual CEO can only hurt a relatively small number of people" - Tard of Tards

Goldman Sachs.