Viacom replays copyright claims in YouTube appeal

Dec 03, 2010 By MICHAEL LIEDTKE , AP Technology Writer
In this file photo made Jan. 19, 2010, the entrance to Viacom's headquarters is shown in New York. Viacom is appealing a court decision Friday, Dec. 3, 2010, that YouTube obeyed copyright laws even though the Internet video site used to show thousands of pirated clips. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, file)

(AP) -- Viacom Inc. is seeking to overturn a court decision that dismissed its claims of copyright abuse against YouTube even though the Internet video site used to show thousands of pirated clips.

The challenge filed Friday in a federal appeals court in New York had been expected since a June ruling rebuffed Viacom's copyright infringement lawsuit against YouTube and its owner, Google Inc.

Viacom's renewed effort to collect more than $1 billon in alleged damages from Google is the latest twist in a closely watched legal battle that has already dragged on for nearly four years. Oral argument on the appeal probably won't happen until at least next summer.

The case revolves around the premise that YouTube became the world's leading online video channel after its 2005 inception by turning a blind eye to the rampant piracy on its site. Viacom argued that YouTube's founders realized the copyright-protected clips from shows such as Viacom's "The Daily Show" attracted far more viewers than the amateur video of cute kittens and angst-ridden teenagers.

Piracy was so prevalent at YouTube in its early years that Google branded the video-sharing site as "a `rogue enabler' of content theft" before it bought the service in 2006, according to internal documents unearthed in the lawsuit.

The unauthorized material stored on YouTube included tens of thousands of clips from Viacom programs shown on MTV, Comedy Central and Nickelodeon.

Underscoring its resolve, Viacom hired well-known attorney Theodore Olson to steer the challenge in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. He served as U.S. solicitor general during the first term of President George W. Bush.

"We are appealing a very bad decision, which would have serious repercussions for our economy and for the creative works for people who spend time trying to enrich our lives," Olson said in an interview.

Google is confident the lower-court ruling that cleared YouTube will be upheld. "We regret that Viacom continues to drag out this case," spokesman Aaron Zamost said.

Viacom's appeal will hinge on its argument that YouTube doesn't qualify for the protections allowed under a 12-year-old law that insulates Internet services from copyright claims as long as they promptly remove illegal content after being notified of a violation.

U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton concluded that YouTube had complied with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, absolving it of legal liability for the theft of its users. He dismissed Viacom's lawsuit before a trial.

But Viacom contends YouTube doesn't fall under the law's "safe harbor" provision because its founders - Chad Hurley, Steve Chen and Jawed Karim - welcomed the piracy as a way of expanding its audience and increasing the chances that they could get rich quick by selling the site to a larger company. The founders cashed in when Google bought YouTube for $1.76 billion four years ago.

None of them is still in leadership positions at YouTube, which now receives about 35 hours of video every minute. The site relies on technology developed by Google to identify and block unauthorized content.

Viacom's appeal cites evidence that YouTube could have done more to prevent pirated clips from appearing on its site, but held off on imposing tougher controls because the site's managers knew viewership would plunge without the copyright-protected material.

Granting YouTube immunity under the 1998 copyright law would be "absurd, disquieting and disruptive," Olson wrote in Viacom's 61-page appeal.

But Internet service providers and free-speech groups believe more damage would be done if YouTube loses its tussle with Viacom. They fear a ruling against YouTube would undercut the digital copyright act and make it more difficult for people to express themselves online, because service providers fearing lawsuits would block controversial, but legal content.

Explore further: Net neutrality balancing act

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Judge rebuffs Viacom in YouTube copyright case (Update)

Jun 23, 2010

(AP) -- YouTube's actions spoke louder than its founders' words when it came down to deciding whether the Internet's most watched video site illegally exploited copyrighted clips owned by media company Viacom ...

Viacom-YouTube secrets to be exposed in lawsuit

Mar 17, 2010

(AP) -- A legal tussle pitting media conglomerate Viacom Inc. against online video leader YouTube is about to get dirtier as a federal judge prepares to release documents that will expose their secrets and other confidential ...

Viacom, YouTube air dirty laundry in legal battle

Mar 18, 2010

(AP) -- Viacom Inc. and Google Inc.'s YouTube site began airing each other's dirty laundry Thursday, providing a tantalizing peek at the wheeling and dealing that triggered a bitter battle over the copyright ...

YouTube wins piracy case against Spanish TV

Sep 23, 2010

YouTube cannot be held responsible for screening images uploaded on its site, a Spanish court said on Thursday, throwing out a case brought by a local TV channel over alleged copyright infringement.

New round of documents aired in Viacom-Google case

Apr 16, 2010

(AP) -- Before it bought online video service YouTube, employees of Google Inc. believed YouTube's business was risky because it relied on pirated content and recommended pursuing a different strategy, newly released documents ...

Recommended for you

Net neutrality balancing act

3 hours ago

Researchers in Italy, writing in the International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management have demonstrated that net neutrality benefits content creator and consumers without compromising provider innovation nor pr ...

Twitter rules out Turkey office amid tax row

Apr 16, 2014

Social networking company Twitter on Wednesday rejected demands from the Turkish government to open an office there, following accusations of tax evasion and a two-week ban on the service.

How does false information spread online?

Apr 16, 2014

Last summer the World Economic Forum (WEF) invited its 1,500 council members to identify top trends facing the world, including what should be done about them. The WEF consists of 80 councils covering a wide range of issues including social media. Members come ...

User comments : 0

More news stories

Tiny power plants hold promise for nuclear energy

Small underground nuclear power plants that could be cheaper to build than their behemoth counterparts may herald the future for an energy industry under intense scrutiny since the Fukushima disaster, the ...

Hand out money with my mobile? I think I'm ready

A service is soon to launch in the UK that will enable us to transfer money to other people using just their name and mobile number. Paym is being hailed as a revolution in banking because you can pay peopl ...

Classifying cognitive styles across disciplines

Educators have tried to boost learning by focusing on differences in learning styles. Management consultants tout the impact that different decision-making styles have on productivity. Various fields have ...