Scientific discovery moves racetrack memory closer to reality
IBM researchers today revealed a previously unknown aspect of key physics inside Racetrack memory -- a new technology design which stands to improve memory capabilities within mobile phones, laptop computers and business-class servers. This new class of memory could enable devices to store much more information - as much as a factor of 100 times greater - while using much less energy than today's designs.
The Racetrack memory project -- which started in IBM's Research labs only six years ago -- flips the current memory paradigm on its head. Instead of making computers seek out the data it needs as is the case in traditional computing systems IBMs Racetrack memory automatically moves data to where it can be used, sliding magnetic bits back and forth along nanowire "racetracks." This technique would allow electronic manufacturers to design a portable device capable of storing all the movies produced worldwide in a given year with room to spare.
Digital data is typically stored in magnetic hard disk drives, which are low-cost but slow due to their moving parts, or in solid state memory such as Flash memory, which are faster but more expensive. Racetrack memory aims to combine the best attributes of these two types of devices by storing data as magnetic regions also called domains in racetracks just a few tens of nanometers wide.
The new understanding, revealed today in the journal Science, allows the precise control of the placement of these domains, which the IBM team has proven can act as nano-sized data keepers that can not only store at least 100 times more memory than today's techniques, but can be accessed at much greater speeds. By controlling electrical pulses in the device, the scientists can move these domain walls at speeds of hundreds of miles per hour and then stop them precisely at the position needed -- allowing massive amounts of stored information to be accessed in less than a billionth of a second.
The full scientific details of the discovery can be read in the scientific paper. In short, the IBM scientists were the first to measure the time and distance of domain wall acceleration and deceleration in response to electric current pulses, which is how digital information is moved and processed in Racetrack memory. This not only gives scientists an unprecedented understanding and control over the magnetic movements inside these devices but also advances IBMs Racetrack memory -- driving it closer to marketplace viability.
We discovered that domain walls don't hit peak acceleration as soon as the current is turned on, and that it takes them exactly the same time and distance to hit peak acceleration as it does to decelerate and eventually come to a stop, said Dr. Stuart Parkin, an IBM Fellow at IBM Research Almaden. This was previously undiscovered in part because it was not clear whether the domain walls actually had mass, and how the effects of acceleration and deceleration could exactly compensate one another. Now we know domain walls can be positioned precisely along the racetracks simply by varying the length of the current pulses even though the walls have mass.
To achieve the densest and fastest possible memory, the domain walls inside the device must be moved at speeds of hundreds of miles per hour to atomically precise positions along the tracks. These timescales (tens of nanoseconds) and distances (micrometers) are surprisingly long, especially since previous experiments had shown no evidence for acceleration and deceleration for domain walls driven along smooth racetracks with current.
A closer look at Racetrack
For nearly fifty years, scientists have explored the possibility of storing information in magnetic domain walls, which are the boundaries between magnetic regions or "domains" in magnetic materials. Until now, manipulating domain walls was expensive, complex and used significant power to generate the fields necessary to do so. In a proof of concept paper in 2008(i) IBM researchers were the first to demonstrate the potential of Racetrack memory, showing how the use of spin momentum considerably simplifies the memory device.
The details and results of this research effort will be reported in the December 24, 2010 issue of Science. The paper is titled, Dynamics of magnetic domain walls under their own inertia, and is authored by Luc Thomas, Rai Moriya, Charles Rettner and Stuart Parkin of IBM Research Almaden.
More information: (i) Hayashi, M., Thomas, L., Moriya, R., Rettner, C. & Parkin, S. S. P. Current-Controlled Magnetic Domain-Wall Nanowire Shift Register. Science 320, 209-211 (2008)
For more information about Racetrack Memory, please visit: http://www.almaden … d/?racetrack
Provided by IBM
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Scotland passes turbine test to harness tidal power,
40 comments
-
The need for practical electronic and mechanical skills for aspiring experimentalists
5 hours ago
-
Refraction and splitting of a photon
6 hours ago
-
Total pressure load on a chain...
7 hours ago
-
Water under pressure and temperature effects
10 hours ago
-
Flow, different liquid, pressure
11 hours ago
-
Dimensions and Degrees of Freedom
12 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
23 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (12) |
31
|
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (5) |
14
|
Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?
The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.
May 21, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (3) |
8
Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector
A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...
May 21, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (16) |
7
|
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Researchers demonstrate possible primitive mechanism of chemical info self-replication
(Phys.org) -- When scientists think about the replication of information in chemistry, they usually have in mind something akin to what happens in living organisms when DNA gets copied: a double-stranded molecule ...
Oldest Jewish archaeological evidence on the Iberian Peninsula
German archaeologists of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena found one of the oldest archaeological evidence so far of Jewish Culture on the Iberian Peninsula at an excavation site in the south of Portugal, ...
MIT researchers devise new means to synchronize a group of robots (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- For several years, roboticists have been working out ways to get a group of robots to perform synchronized activities as demonstrated most often in dance routines. Its not just about trying ...
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
We are suddenly getting a tsunami of quantum, optical, and spin-based discoveries and even devices in the past week or so.
Is everyone suddenly paranoid someone else is going to beat them to their patents, so now they have to publish even if they were stalling before?
These discoveries are amazing. They are now saying they think they can store like almost a terrabyte in a Smart Phone's memory? And what? A petabyte in a device the size of PC's hard drive?
Moore's law was suppposed to be like 2^(N/2), but they just jumped two orders of magnituded within 6 years...
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (9)
IBM is also predicting metal air batteries that will last 10 times longer then current generation. With a week of battery time and a terrabyte of memory in phone (why do even still call them phones? actually making calls is the least of their ability) you wont even need a desktop computer, just keyboard maybe and a monitor.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (4)
So why not also use this same technique to push magnetic domains, and therefore spin-bits, across nano-wire buses inside and between chips?
Oh yeah, look at the other IBM post.
Holographic video conferencing in five years. They'll be using those petabyte hard drives alright.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (10)
With that much space, someone will simply come up with a way to use it. Here's one: Real-life Tivo. Record everything that's going on around you 24/7, including your physical space but also all the data streams you encounter (phone calls, text messages, e-mails, TV shows, internet radio, facebook/twitter whatever-they're-called). Don't erase anything, just keep it around in case you want to rewind.
Why would anyone want this? I don't know, but I can't understand facebook, either.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
...and record the Holographic video conference you had with the boss (or the employee.)
Starcraft 3 and Diablo 4 with holographic actors instead of dinky animated 3d models.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
I really would like to have the best 10,000 movies of all time in *uncompressed* 1080p. That's around 40PB if my calcs are correct
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Figure the "enterprise" versions of these devices are probably going to be like 100 petabyte or even exabyte storage devices specifically designed for use with servers.
A buddy of mine works for one of Google's competitors, and that company has converted an entire shopping mall to a data center, with row after row after row of servers throughout most of the complex. Imagine if all of them had these...
It's like the forbidden planet.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Yeah, people might not like the cloud, but its coming. Google and Amazon and Apple are all building server farms as fast as they can right now. And they would all tell you that they still need more. It's a good time to be selling the servers and making the silicon inside them.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Hmmm, I remember someone saying once, "We'll never need more than 640K of RAM." Bill Gates if I recall correctly.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
But is Racetrack Memory the winning technology? It's really, really hard to push the king off the mountain.
As ComputerWorld explains, http://www.comput...myId=147
commercial Racetrack Memory products are 2-5 years away.
In comparison, Flash has been doubling capacity about every 1.3 years while halving price about every year. (Does anybody remember how great bubble memory was going to be? Or Nanochip? Or how optical drives would supplant magnetic hdds?) For decades, clever disc engineers have pushed the bar higher.
Luckily, we non-combatant consumers win no matter what technology ends up on top. And now it looks like my next laptop will have solid-state mass storage, not rotating. Cool.
But flash or racetrack in 2-5 years? Depends on how clever the Flash engineers are, too. No?
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Yeah, it's pretty awesome. I can carry thousands of time more information in my pocket than could be fit in a whole building when I was born.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Are you KIDDING??? I can use any amount you make available to me. I can use up a petabyte in 612 days. If I hook up 5 HD security cameras around my house (one for each external wall (4) and one for the front door (5 total)), each records 13.6GB/hour, 326.4GB/day, 1.632TB per day for all 5. That'd take 612 days to use up a PT. Not to mention all the possibilities that open up with that amount of storage. I'd also have cameras with multiple views on my vehicles while driving... I'd probably have a camera on my body somewhere, recording my entire life, have screen recorders that record full video of everything I do on the computer, making it easier to use my computer screen like a DVR (rewind what I had done a few minutes earlier).
continued...
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Then imagine all those cameras recording in 3D. I don't know about the 3D codecs yet, but I'd imagine they consume maybe 1.2 to 2x as much space per unit of time.
Imagine your DVR... I'd have mine recording continuously. Today, that'd be 2 receivers continuously recording. I think my Dish Network DVR records about 2.6GB/hour in HD, so I could record 5.2GB/hour all day long, non-stop. That's 124.8GB/day, 45TB, year... just on 2 channels of continuous recording. It also opens up the doors to "black box" type data recording of driving history, temperature, humidity, wind, power usage, etc... The possibilities are limitless.
Trust me, when that type of storage is available, we programmers will use it up. I've got 4.5TB of hard drive space on my primary home computer right now, and I'm about out of space.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
That was my first thought too when I read him saying there won't be PB drives.
BTW, Bill Gates didn't actually say that, but that phrase has been incorrectly attributed to him for decades now.
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
That's even better than the 1.5TB drive I got at Walmart 2 weeks ago for $70. Jeesh! We can now buy the storage equivilent of the human brain (~4TB) for $170. Freaking amazing! And that's just off-the-shelf tech in stores TODAY...
(yes, I know... we don't really know the storage capacity of the human brain. I quote 4TB because that's what I've heard from several sources over the last 10 years... just speculation, I know).
Dec 23, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Yes, that is very questionable, but the biggest difference between the human brain's memory and disk storage is that the brain's memory is highly associative, which easily trumps brute capacity alone.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
There is a limit to how much memory you need for a given task. Even tasks, such as video recording have an upper limit. For example - it is meaningless to record a movie at resolution which is higher than "resolution" of human eye. Eventually we will have more memory then we need to use for our task and goals. Heck even now I ask myself what to do with 350 gb of my 1 tb hdd.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
No it's not. For forensic purposes, you'd want a holgram with maximum resolution and maximum color depth.
So you wouldn't set up perfect surveillance of your home if you had the means? That would use much more than 1tb, even with the best compression imaginable. Even if discarded anything over a month old, I'm pretty sure you'd need much more than 1 tb.
----
As for holographic codecs, it would depend on the camera, color depth, resolution, and optical array/lidar resolution.
Formula for surface of a square is X^2.
Formula for surface of a cube is 6X^2, while sphere is 4pir^2.
Because every pixel is mapped in 3d, you need (x,y,z) coordinate for every pixel in a hologram.
cont..
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
Then to have resolution similar to a monitor, instead of 1600*900=1.44 million pixels, you would have like 1600*900*900 = 1.29 billion pixels.
You need all 1.29 billion pixels, even though only some are used in any given image, because you need to project the illusion of surfaces of unknown shape, curvature, and size in space.
So a hologram has thousands of times more pixels, and each pixel requires at least 2 more bytes of storage space just to record it's coordinate, which means a hologram file would be about 1350 times larger than a 2d photo, if it has 900 pixels resolution into the 3rd dimension.
Yeah, you'll be needing that petabyte hard drive.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Upwards and onwards. Always waiting for the next cool thing.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Your hand held gadget will still have wireless, but you'll also have "wired" connections which will use an optical port. You'll be able to place your phone in front of the port and transfer data at huge speeds over short distances, using arrays of optical transmitters and recievers based on the very same phased array concept currently used in radars, but will instead be with optics and infrared.
So the data transfer and the holographic cameras, etc, will all work based on similar principles, which are themselves based on phased array radar technology. The key difference is individual diodes are going to be on the nano-scale and micrometer scales where the wavelengths of visible light and infrared light operate
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Merry Christmas
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I can think of "theoretical" ways to store more data in the same space. For example, an analog approach might allow you to stor data in higher bases, which translates to much higher data density.
DNA = 4 base
Codon = base 64
So if you could get to base 4 through some novel means of analog data storage, such as detecting and controlling the SIZE of the magnetic data points, and not just their existence (yes/no,) then you could store data in analog sets, allowing higher bases. Every time you double your base you double data density.
I'm not necessarily talking about DNA based computers, nor "analog computers". Just saying, you could have an analog converter for the secondary storage device.
Or in a photonic device, you could designate certain wavelengths of light to represent different values, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc, and then store data in "base n" in analog form at the nano-scale...somehow...
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
So yes, the addition of a third coordinate as well as 900 pixels of z does add up to 1350x the amount of data. But your statement is untrue except in the case of a truly unusual image in which all pixels in the hologram are visible, random, and unique. In terms of real world and practical applications, you will not be storing images 1350x the size of an equivalent 2d image.
By the way, unless you have camera array arranged in a circular fashion, you won't be shooting true, rotatable 3d anyways.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I could definitely use video that's orders of magnitude higher resolution than the human eye. I could zoom in to get more detail of a scene. zooming in has a whole plethora of uses.
and again, 3D holography has enormous size requirements. we haven't even begun to touch on AI yet, which will easily consume everything we through at it.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
In theory, it should be possible to store at least one number in base 12 on a single molecule through a mechanical means, by turning a nano-motor or manipulating a magnet or laser.
Then assuming the nano-motors or laser, etc, isn't larger than it's worth, you should end up with greater data density than anything I've seen so far. However, it will certainly be much slower than much of anything too, because it would require a device to read it and convert it to binary and vice versa.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
I agree. But hollywood and video game developers have access to the funds to do those types of projects using (presumably soon,) combination phased array optical cameras and lidar, you could probably do a "true" hologram with around 5 to 10 camera stations in the following locations with respect to subject/origin:
+/- x
+/- y
+ z
4 diagonals
So front/back, left/right, overhead, and 4 diagonal overheads using phased optical array detectors should eventually allow accurate, "better than human eye" quality 3-d mapping of just about anything.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The premise of your response it true; we do need more storage for 3D, but your understanding of how we store pixel data is incorrect. in the largest image files(uncompressed), we never store pixel location... only color data about the pixel. its coordinates are infered by its location in the file. the size of the image (width, high, color depth) are usually stored near the beginning of the file, then the rest is just a 2D array of colors. for 3D, we'd also include depth size in the header and our pixel data would be a 3D array.
but your overall point is true. 3D takes more space.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Have it set up where distinct values are seperated sufficiently on the temerpature scale to be well outside the margin of error.
Then let's say you can safely vary the temperature of the molecule by 30 degrees, and the margin of error in your measurement is is like 0.001 degrees. Then you should be able to easily store data by incrementing the temperature of the molecule by some easily maintainable metric, such as 0.1 degrees. This would means you could store numbers 0 to 299, more than a byte, in a single molecule if you can vary the temperature across 30 degrees.
Ok, so this is probably an exaggeration, but it is another example of trying to think outside the box of "bits and "bytes," electrons and magnetism.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Like instead of temperature, spin the molecule and count how fast it's spinning. each rpm could equal 1 increment in a non-binary numbernig system....
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
While true, we generally don't vectorize scanned images. Especially not photos. We use different algorithms that approximate the original pixels. This is not nearly as space efficient as "knowing" the true bounds of an object, but is significantly more efficient than no compression. 3D, however, will improve upon this because of the nature of 3D, we'll have better object boundary information available to make /some/ border identification, but lots of it will still have to be stored in a 3D pixel approximation. That's for STORAGE, but for display, 3D array of pixels, similarly to how your monitor and tv have a full 2D array of uncompressed pixels, even when displaying a compressed photo.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Although I thought of one other theoretical possibility, which is of course to literally count atoms like counting marbles or jelly beans in a jar.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Consider we have a "stick" made of a single Carbon Nanotube, then we can store an half-Byte of data in that nano-tube physically by moving the tube left to right by a distance equal to the width of one carbon atom, and clamping it in place. The length on the one side corresponds linearly to the value we are storing, 0 to 15.
A nano-tube is about 12nm diameter, and you'd only need length equal to about 16 atom's width, plus however much you need for a clamp of the mechanism to move it. This would theoretically allow 9 half-bytes stored in an area about 39nm by 39nm, and about 20nm tall. Compared to the best cache in a 32nm process chip, which is currently just one BIT in a 32nm by 32nm transistor, not even counting wires...
So this could theoretically store 4.5 bytes mechanically in the same space as a modern bit.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Even the nano-tube approach could theoretically obtain a much higher data density than DNA, by the time you count DNA bases are doubled, and the deoxyribose or ribose part is about the same as the machinery to move the sticks, and the read head might be a laser or a force microscope analogous to a ribosome. The data density is similar to DNA, if not greater.
If you used the polymer as in paragraph 1, you might be able to obtain data densities as much as 49 nibbles (half bytes) in an area of 36nm by 36nm by ~20nm height.
Even DNA can't be any denser, because polymers are actually narrower than DNA bases, plus again, the DNA has the deoxyribose and the pairing to waste space. If you interpret DNA in codons of 2 = base 16, and not as dense as just using polymer "sticks".
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Technology is limited by our capacity to gain useful benefit from deploying it.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
However regardless of consumer uptake, if you offered Google Petabyte memory drives, they would probably buy out your entire production capacity.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Actually, 3d will make the visual search algorithm easier, because these devices will work just like Radar and Sonar, except with visible and infrared light. This will allow the computer to find "boundaries" much easier than just using two dimensional photography. The software will be able to cross reference the infrared, visible, and lidar aspects to spot exactly where boundaries are and exactly what their colors, temperatures, and shapes are in 3d.
Whereas conventional vision finding software works by contrasting pixels and looking for specified two-dimensional shapes, and they aren't very good at dealing with it when the shapes aren't oriented precisely. With the tools I'm talking about, this won't be a problem.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
A hollywood studio or game developer using a system of cameras to see all surfaces, and correct for one another's margins of error, should be able to eventually map the 3-d surface of an actor's body accurate to within the wavelength of visible light.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
I worry about an FBI surveillance program with Street View like database with constant updates. I am very libertarian when it comes to police actions, it might be about time to update our privacy laws, IMHO.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
These pulses are used the same way radar and sonar works, to measure the surface of the object/person, giving an accurate 3-d return signal, who's resolution is limited only by the wavelength of light and the scale of the detectors, which would be a phased array of nano-dipoles (probably carbon nano tubes or something similar.)
So for science and forensic cameras, they can have resolution approaching nearly 300,000 times what most human eyes can discern at arm's length...in each dimension.
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
yeah, well, I find people tend not to realize what new technologies are capable of. We have these smart phones and stuff, but we aren't realizing how world changing this technology can be.
We have the computer technology to do self-driving cars now, and yet only a handful of groups in the world are even working on the actual application of these technologies. All the individual component technologies exist.
Then there's nanotech. The applications in medicine and manufacturing are almost fantastic, and yet the government has spent very little for R&D. We should be spending as much or more in nanotech than anything else.
When you try to explain what this stuff definitely can do, and what it probably can do, people just laugh or shrug..
Dec 24, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 28, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Are you serious?
I have 4 terabytes filled in my home PC... I could easily fill much much more also. I am considering buying 2 more 2tb drives instead of deleting some of my bluray videos and 1080p television shows...
As soon as 3D takes off, which is just around the corner (next few years at least), you will see 100gb+ 3D movies. 10 movies per terabyte... I have over 100 movies on my hard drives and god knows how many hundreds of hours of television shows right now.
I don't know what you use your home PC for, but don't dictate what I can or should be able to use mine for, and don't make stupid statements like "There is no need for X amount of memory/hard drive space"... because you will proven wrong every single time.
(and that's just home PC's, forget about enterprise systems that ALREADY house petabyte databases...)
Dec 30, 2010
Rank: not rated yet