Review: Nookcolor is best dedicated e-reader

Dec 01, 2010 By PETER SVENSSON , AP Technology Writer
The Barnes & Noble NookColor, left, and an Apple iPad are shown in this photograph, in New York, Wednesday, Dec. 1, 2010. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)

(AP) -- When Barnes & Noble Inc. began to sell its first electronic reading device, the Nook, a year ago, I found it as welcome as a bookcase landing on my toe. It was a terrible design - slow, confusing and buggy.

The successor, the Nookcolor, is a huge improvement and the best dedicated on the market this holiday season.

The new color touch screen makes navigation and reading much easier. At $249, it is great for consumers who are not yet willing to spring for a pricier tablet computer such as the iPad.

The original had two screens: one big, Kindle-like gray-scale "electronic ink" display for reading and one small touch-enabled color display for navigation. It was like an unholy marriage between a Kindle and an iPod Touch, worse than either product on its own.

The Nookcolor, which went on sale two weeks ago, dispenses with the e-ink screen. The color screen has swelled to 7 inches diagonally, taking over the whole surface and making the Nookcolor look like the mid-sized product of a happy union between an iPhone and an iPad.

Other color e-book readers have hit the market this year from smaller names, including Sharper Image with its Literati. They've been hampered by poor screens that make the text shimmer uncomfortably. Barnes & Noble's screen uses the same technology as Apple Inc. does for its iPad, and it's wonderfully crisp.

E-ink readers such as the Kindle do have one selling point: They provide a more paper-like reading experience, which sounds attractive to people who find that staring at a computer screen for hours on end is uncomfortable. However, I believe most of this discomfort derives from screens that are set to shine too brightly. I found the Nookcolor quite comfortable to read on, partly because it's easy to adjust the brightness of the backlight for pretty much any reading environment. Blazing sunshine will still wash the screen out, though.

Most importantly, the touch-sensitive color screen makes navigation much easier. The Nook's software isn't exemplary in its clarity and I did experience a few glitches, but it's not hard to get the hang of it.

Here's how the Nook stacks up with the competition:

- Amazon.com Inc.'s Kindle has stuck to e-ink technology, which has been the norm for e-readers so far. It has only one virtue: It's easy to read in broad daylight. In all other ways, e-ink is a disastrous technology and makes navigation a chore. The Kindle can't show color, scroll or zoom images, and the text is dark grey on a light grey background. It doesn't come with its own light source.

In the Kindle's favor, the reader is cheaper, available for as low as $139. There's also a $189 version that comes with free access to AT&T Inc.'s cellular broadband network. (The first Nook was cellular too, but the current version relies solely on Wi-Fi hotspots.) The Kindle is about the same size as the Nookcolor, but weighs half as much.

The Kindle doesn't accept e-books from public libraries. The Nook does, though it treats them as second-class citizens. They can't been pinned to the "home" reading screen, so firing them up takes more time than with other titles.

- Apple Inc.'s iPad does far, far more than the Nook, and it is much better at presenting magazines and newspapers, thanks to a screen that's twice as big. Magazines, in particular, are terribly clumsy to navigate on the Nook. The Nookcolor is more portable and cheaper, and its screen brightness can be turned up higher, so it's a better choice if you plan to mainly use the tablet for reading novels. The iPad is better in every other way, so buy one if you can afford the $499 starting price.

Apple's iPod Touch is a viable e-book reader as well and starts at $229, making it slightly cheaper than the Nook. The screen is a third of the size of the Nook's. Like the iPad, the iPod Touch can access not just Barnes & Noble's e-book store, but scores of others, including Amazon's Kindle store. However, the small screen means that it's best bought as a general entertainment device. If you really want something to read books on, the Nook is a better choice.

Both the iPad and the beat the Nookcolor in terms of battery life, but at eight hours, the Nook is good enough. Expect to charge it every three or four days.

The Nook is based on Google Inc.'s smart-phone operating system, Android, but it doesn't run any of the tens of thousands of third-party Android programs, or apps, that are available for phones. Barnes & Noble plans to launch its own app store early next year. In the meantime, the Nook does come with a Web browser and a couple of apps, including Sudoku and Pandora's Internet music service.

Barnes & Noble is taking advantage of the color touch screen by selling children's books with built-in narration tracks. It's a fine idea, and my 3-year-old daughter soon got the hang of starting up the device, navigating to a book, and following along by swiping the screen to go from page to page. But the books cost $8 each, while iPhone and iPad apps that are more engaging and animated, such as a version of "Dr. Seuss "Green Eggs and Ham," cost just $2 each.

I don't think dedicated e-readers are going to get much better than the Nook, at least not when it comes to the hardware. Maybe they'll become a bit slimmer and lighter and have longer-lasting batteries, but there won't be much time for big improvements, because within a few years, general-purpose tablets such as the iPad and Samsung Galaxy Tab will have taken over this niche. Though it may get some more apps next year, the Nook won't be able to match the versatility of a general-purpose tablet.

The Nookcolor could use one immediate improvement: a space between "Nook" and "color." As it is, the name sounds too much like a mispronunciation of "nuclear" when you say it too fast, and that's not a word you want to stumble into when you're at an airport security checkpoint.

But other than that, it's a good choice for someone who doesn't want to spring for an iPad. Welcome to adulthood, e-readers.

Explore further: BlackBerry sets new phone launch in revival bid

3 /5 (6 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Review: Barnes & Noble reader is dual-screen mess

Dec 09, 2009

(AP) -- The e-book reading device is the gadget gift of the season. Both Sony and Barnes & Noble have sold out of their new models, and new buyers will have to wait until January for delivery. So why are ...

E-reader faceoff: Kindle or Nook? Here's a comparison

Aug 27, 2010

There's a titanic battle brewing in the e-reader market. The Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook are leaving competitors in the dust this summer and are locked in a war that has dropped prices by more ...

Recommended for you

Samsung may launch first Tizen phone in India

17 hours ago

Samsung Electronics Co., which faces a slowdown in emerging market smartphone sales, will release its long-delayed Tizen-powered handset in India before the end of this year, a report said Monday.

Microsoft delays launch of Xbox in China

19 hours ago

Microsoft, which was due to launch the Xbox One in China on Tuesday, has said it will put back the "historic" event to later this year, slowing what was billed as the first game console to enter the market ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

damnfuct
5 / 5 (5) Dec 01, 2010
Still, isn't the point of an e-reader to have a non-backlit display?
Yellowdart
not rated yet Dec 01, 2010
Yeah, the battery life is rather low for an e-reader; however, its already been rooted, and as an android tablet...for that price, probably kicks the knees out of the iPad. Too bad B&N didnt release it with better app integration from the start or 3g...they'd destroy everything else.
Monshat
5 / 5 (1) Dec 01, 2010
For serious readers of books, the e-ink readers are close to perfection. If you want a computer with an LED screen for surfing, stretching the screen, gazing at pretty things and playing games, then go for the ipad.
trantor
5 / 5 (1) Dec 01, 2010
if you want to READ, get an e-ink. If you want to gaze at images and videos, and need an LCD (or OLED) display, it means you WONT BE READING!

plus, e-ink only consumes electricity when you move or change pages. If you are a slow reader, and spend TIME at each page, then get an e-ink reader.
boznz
not rated yet Dec 01, 2010
8 hours is not good enough for me, will stick with the normal e-ink until they can pan it out to 2-3 weeks.
Jadxia
not rated yet Dec 01, 2010
Backlit screens bother my eyes, which is why e-ink is so perfect for reading. I love the original nook, but if I wanted color I'd go for an iPad.
alq131
not rated yet Dec 02, 2010
I see no reason that the Kindle couldn't have a touch screen...its just some sort of capacitive layer overlay on, i'm assuming, ANY display. An e-ink reader with a touch screen could be neat...but as a reader, it could also be really annoying if you point to paragraphs or follow along with your finger, which I'm apt to do.

Not having a touch screen isn't a huge limitation. it would be great to have some better way of representing where in the book you are. dog-ear pages are gone, and while bookmarks exist electronically, they still don't seem the same as real bookmarks
Jon_42
not rated yet Dec 02, 2010
How is an e-ink display competition? i.e. doesn't Nook make one?
eg. until Kindle makes a color screen, just stick to comparing e-ink with other e-ink devices.
denijane
not rated yet Dec 22, 2010
Sony Reader has an option for touch screen. I own such reader and I'm extremely happy with it. Even though it doesn't have color. But why should it? I use it to read books, normal books are not in color. If I want to watch video or to browse, I'll simply use my laptop or phone. It makes absolutely no sense to me to buy LCD eReader. Because even if it looks fancy, it still strains my eyes.