Next Mars rover to zap rocks with powerful laser

December 23, 2010 By Guy Webster

Next Mars rover to zap rocks with powerful laser

Enlarge

Researchers prepare for a test of the Chemistry and Camera (ChemCam) instrument that will fly on NASA's Mars Science Laboratory mission. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/LANL

A rock-zapping laser instrument on NASA's next Mars rover has roots in a demonstration that Roger Wiens saw 13 years ago in a colleague's room at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.

The Chemistry and Camera (ChemCam) instrument on the rover Curiosity can hit rocks with a laser powerful enough to excite a pinhead-size spot into a glowing, ionized gas. ChemCam then observes the flash through a telescope and analyzes the spectrum of light to identify the in the target.

That information about rocks or patches of soil up to about 7 meters (23 feet) away will help the rover team survey the rover's surroundings and choose which targets to drill into, or scoop up, for additional analysis by other instruments on Curiosity. With the 10 on the rover, the team will assess whether any environments in the landing area have been favorable for and for preserving evidence about whether life existed. In late 2011, NASA will launch Curiosity and the other parts of the flight system, delivering the rover to the surface of in August 2012.

Wiens, a geochemist with the U.S. Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory, serves as ChemCam's principal investigator. An American and French team that he leads proposed the instrument during NASA's 2004 open competition for participation in the Mars Science Laboratory project, whose rover has since been named Curiosity.

In 1997, while working on an idea for using lasers to investigate the moon, Wiens visited a chemistry laboratory building where a colleague, Dave Cremers, had been experimenting with a different . Cremers set up a cigar-size laser powered by a little 9-volt radio battery and pointed at a rock across the room.

"The room was well used. Every flat surface was covered with instruments, lenses or optical mounts," Wiens recalls. "The filing cabinets looked like they had a bad case of acne. I found out later that they were used for laser target practice."

Cremers pressed a button. An invisible beam from the laser set off a flash on a rock across the room. The flash was ionized gas, or plasma, generated by the energy from the laser exciting atoms in the rock. A spectrometer pointed at the glowing plasma recorded the intensity of light at different wavelengths for determining the rock's atomic ingredients.

Researchers have used lasers for inducing plasmas for decades. What impressed Wiens in this demonstration was the capability to do it with such a low-voltage power source and compact hardware. Using this technology for a robot on another planet seemed feasible. From that point, more than a decade of international development and testing resulted in ChemCam being installed on Curiosity in September 2010.

The international collaboration came about in 2001 when Wiens introduced a former Los Alamos post-doctoral researcher, Sylvestre Maurice, to the project. The core technology of ChemCam, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, had been used for years in France as well as in America, but it was still unknown to space scientists there. "The technique is both flashy and very compelling scientifically, and the reviewers in France really liked that combination," Maurice said. A French team was formed, and work on a new laser began.

"The trick is very short bursts of the laser," Wiens said. "You really dump a lot of energy onto a small spot -- megawatts per square millimeter -- but just for a few nanoseconds."

The pinhead-size spot hit by ChemCam's laser gets as much power focused on it as a million light bulbs, for five one-billionths of a second. Light from the resulting flash comes back to ChemCam through the instrument's telescope, mounted beside the laser high on the rover's camera mast. The telescope directs the light down an optical fiber to three spectrometers inside the rover. The spectrometers record intensity at 6,144 different wavelengths of ultraviolet, visible and infrared light. Different chemical elements in the target emit light at different wavelengths.

If the rock has a coating of dust or a weathered rind, multiple shots from the laser can remove those layers to provide a clear shot to the rock's interior composition. "We can see what the progression of composition looks like as we get a little bit deeper with each shot," Wiens said.

Earlier Mars rover missions have lacked a way to identify some of the lighter elements, such as carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, lithium and boron, which can be clues to past environmental conditions in which the rock was formed or altered. After NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Spirit examined an outcrop called "Comanche" in 2005, it took years of analyzing indirect evidence before the team could confidently infer the presence of carbon in the rock. A single observation with ChemCam could detect carbon directly.

ChemCam will be able to interrogate multiple targets the same day, gaining information for the rover team's careful selection of where to drill or scoop samples for laboratory investigations that will take multiple days per target. It can also check the composition of targets inaccessible to the rover's other instruments, such as rock faces beyond the reach of Curiosity's arm.

The instrument's telescope doubles as the optics for the camera part of ChemCam, which records images on a one-megapixel detector. The telescopic camera will show context of the spots hit with the laser and can also be used independently of the laser.

The French half of the ChemCam team, headed by Maurice and funded by France's national space agency, provided the instrument's and telescope. Maurice is a spectroscopy expert with the Centre d'Étude Spatiale des Rayonnements, in Toulouse, France. Los Alamos National Laboratory supplied the spectrometers and data processor inside the rover. The optical design of the spectrometers came from Ocean Optics, Dunedin, Fla.

The ChemCam team includes experts in mineralogy, geology, astrobiology and other fields, with some members also on other Curiosity instrument teams.

With the instrument now installed on Curiosity, testing continues at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. JPL, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, is assembling the and other components of the Mars Science Laboratory flight system for launch from Florida between Nov. 25 and Dec. 18, 2011.

Provided by JPL/NASA search and more info website

4.3 /5 (10 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Quantum_Conundrum
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: 2.2 / 5 (5)
The instrument's telescope doubles as the optics for the camera part of ChemCam, which records images on a one-megapixel detector. The telescopic camera will show context of the spots hit with the laser and can also be used independently of the laser.


Only one megapixel?

What's the deal? This is NASA and the ESA, for goodness sake.

We already have smart phones with TWO cameras exceeding that.
Zenmaster
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Sure, ChemCam may not be absolute state of the art today. But compare with the relevant components in consumer-level cameras. There are vast differences in the optics used, CCD size, and CCD quality. Better light gathering capability, better light sensitivity per pixel, more accurate imaging.

Considering memory-storage and transmission requirements of collected data, you'd want to reliably image only that which is actually needed and no more.
Modernmystic
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: 1.8 / 5 (6)
NASA is a ****ing joke. Yay another rover on Mars...meh.

Let's continue to send out little robots with cameras for the next forty years, just like we've done nothing but play pat-a-cake in LEO since we landed on the moon.
Quantum_Conundrum
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (4)
NASA is a ****ing joke. Yay another rover on Mars...meh.

Let's continue to send out little robots with cameras for the next forty years, just like we've done nothing but play pat-a-cake in LEO since we landed on the moon.


Well, everything seems to require a billion dollars just to even start now.

I think I saw a recent estimate claiming it would cost 100 billion dollars to put a man on the moon today, and this is considering that all of the technologies already exist, and instead of the main computer weight a thousand pounds, it could weigh 1 pound, etc, and they say it would still cost 100 billion to land a man on the moon and come right back...

Everything is so corrupted and BS now compared with 40 to 50 years ago.
GSwift7
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
So this will only tell you which elements are present, not the structure or relative quantity of them? I did some reading and I can't seem to find any clear indication of whether it can measure relative quantities.

Interresting that this thing alone is over 10 million dollars and was about 4% of the total mission cost.
Quantum_Conundrum
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: 1.3 / 5 (6)
So this will only tell you which elements are present, not the structure or relative quantity of them? I did some reading and I can't seem to find any clear indication of whether it can measure relative quantities.

Interresting that this thing alone is over 10 million dollars and was about 4% of the total mission cost.


10 million dollars for a 1 megapixel camera. They should have bought an iPod.
Jotaf
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Try sending your phone's camera to Mars and see if it survives the cosmic rays! :)

All the microcontrollers and circuits used in space probes must be coated with gold, made to resist extreme accelerations and vibration, and many other things. Radiation can disrupt electric signals easily and your software/hardware can't crash with a single bad bit. (Like our computers and phones do.)

Also, NASA only uses hardware that has been proven flawless for several years, not the latest gadgets, because they can't return them to the manufacturer from space!
Mira_Musiclab
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I think also you need to consider the optical range, pulse duration, and the fact it's being used for spectrography. Some pretty fast captures, and not exactly photography going on in this bit.

I'd have to look, but I'd be pretty sure the pan-cams, etc, will boast far higher resolutions.
Mira_Musiclab
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Took another read. Does appear that they imply the 1-meg detector is not part of the spectrograph, but for photography. Does seem kind of low considering..

Kindly disregard my previous...
:P
DamienS
Dec 23, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I think I saw a recent estimate claiming it would cost 100 billion dollars to put a man on the moon today, and this is considering that all of the technologies already exist, and instead of the main computer weight a thousand pounds, it could weigh 1 pound, etc, and they say it would still cost 100 billion to land a man on the moon and come right back...

Everything is so corrupted and BS now compared with 40 to 50 years ago.

The initial, optimistic, projected cost for Apollo was 7 billion. A later, more realistic cost was estimated to be 20 billion. The final cost of project Apollo was reported to Congress as $25.4 billion in 1973.

$25.4 billion in 1973 dollars is about $121 billion in 2009 dollars (allowing for inflation). So according to your figure of $100 billion, it would actually be cheaper today.
Rank 4.3 /5 (10 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    created18 hours ago
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
    createdMay 19, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)

The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 21 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (8) | comments 13

Dragon makes history with space station docking

The private company SpaceX made history Friday with the docking of its Dragon capsule to the International Space Station, the most impressive feat yet in turning routine spaceflight over to the commercial ...

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 14 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (6) | comments 0

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 22 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (10) | comments 26

SKA super telescope to be built in Australia, South Africa (Update 2)

A long-running joust to host a radio telescope that would give mankind its farthest peek into the Universe ended on Friday with a Solomon-like judgement to split the site between Australia and South Africa.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 22 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 2

NASA sees Hurricane Bud threaten western Mexico's coast

NASA satellites are providing rainfall, temperature, pressure, visible and infrared data to forecasters as Hurricane Bud is expected to make a quick landfall in western Mexico this weekend before turning back ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 16 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse

(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts

Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.

It's in the genes: Research pinpoints how plants know when to flower

Scientists believe they've pinpointed the last crucial piece of the 80-year-old puzzle of how plants "know" when to flower.

Researchers solve structure of human protein critical for silencing genes

In a study published in the journal Cell on May 24, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) scientists describe the three-dimensional atomic structure of a human protein bound to a piece of RNA that "guides" the pr ...

MIT researchers devise new means to synchronize a group of robots (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- For several years, roboticists have been working out ways to get a group of robots to perform synchronized activities as demonstrated most often in dance routines. It’s not just about trying ...