Hackers strike at MasterCard to support WikiLeaks

December 8, 2010 By RAPHAEL G. SATTER and JILL LAWLESS , Associated Press

Hackers strike at MasterCard to support WikiLeaks (AP)

Enlarge

In this Dec.11, 2009 file photo, a sign for MasterCard credit cards is shown on the entrance to a bank, in New York. Mastercard is having severe technical problem Wednesday, Dec. 8, 2010, possibly a target by supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.(AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, file)

(AP) -- Hackers rushed to the defense of WikiLeaks on Wednesday, launching attacks on MasterCard, Swedish prosecutors, a Swiss bank and others who have acted against the site and its jailed founder Julian Assange.

So-called "hacktivists" operating under the label "Operation Payback" claimed responsibility in a Twitter message for causing severe technological problems at the website for MasterCard, which pulled the plug on its relationship with WikiLeaks a day ago.

MasterCard acknowledged "a service disruption" involving its Secure Code system for verifying online payments. It was not clear how widespread the problem was. Earlier, MasterCard spokesman James Issokson said consumers could still use their credit cards for secure transactions.

MasterCard is the latest in a string of U.S.-based Internet companies - including Visa, Amazon.com, PayPal Inc. and EveryDNS - to cut ties to WikiLeaks in recent days amid intense U.S. government pressure.

Visa said it was having no problems Wednesday. PayPal said it faced "a dedicated denial-of-service attack" for about half an hour Monday but had no problems with its website Wednesday.

The online attacks are part of a wave of support for WikiLeaks that is sweeping the Internet. Twitter was choked with messages of solidarity for the group, while the site's Facebook page hit 1 million fans.

Offline, the organization is under pressure on many fronts. Assange is in a British prison fighting extradition to Sweden over a sex crimes case. Moves by Swiss Postfinance, MasterCard, PayPal and others that cut ways to send donations to the group have impaired its ability to raise money.

Undeterred, WikiLeaks released more confidential U.S. cables Wednesday. The latest batch showed that the British government feared a furious Libyan reaction if the convicted Lockerbie bomber wasn't set free and expressed relief when they learned he would be released in 2009 on compassionate grounds.

Another cable revealed that American officials lobbied the Russian government to amend a financial bill the U.S. felt would "disadvantage U.S. payment card market leaders Visa and MasterCard."

Yet another U.S. memo described German leader Angela Merkel as the "Teflon" chancellor, but she brushed it off as mere party chatter. It also called her risk-averse and seldom creative.

The pro-WikiLeaks vengeance campaign appeared to be taking the form of denial-of-service attacks in which computers are harnessed - sometimes surreptitiously - to jam target sites with mountains of requests for data, knocking them out of commission.

PayPal Vice President Osama Bedier said the company froze WikiLeaks' account after seeing a letter from the U.S. State Department to WikiLeaks saying that its activities "were deemed illegal in the United States."

"It's honestly just pretty straightforward from our perspective," he said at a web conference in Paris.

Neither WikiLeaks nor Assange has been charged with any offense in the U.S., but the U.S. government is investigating whether Assange can be prosecuted for espionage or other offenses. Assange has not been charged with any offenses in Sweden either, but authorities there want to question him about the allegations of sex crimes.

Per Hellqvist, a security specialist with the firm Symantec, said a network of web activists called Anonymous - to which Operation Payback is affiliated - appeared to be behind many of the attacks. The group, which has previously focused on the Church of Scientology and the music industry, is knocking offline websites seen as hostile to WikiLeaks.

"While we don't have much of an affiliation with WikiLeaks, we fight for the same reasons," the group said in a statement. "We want transparency and we counter censorship ... we intend to utilize our resources to raise awareness, attack those against and support those who are helping lead our world to freedom and democracy."

The website for Swedish lawyer Claes Borgstrom, who represents the two women at the center of Assange's sex crimes case, was unreachable Wednesday.

The Swiss postal system's financial arm, Postfinance, which shut down Assange's bank account on Monday, was also having trouble. Spokesman Alex Josty said the website buckled under a barrage of traffic Tuesday.

"Yesterday it was very, very difficult, then things improved overnight," he told the AP. "But it's still not entirely back to normal."

Ironically, the microblogging site Twitter - home of much WikiLeaks support - could become the next target. Operation Payback posted a statement claiming "Twitter you're next for censoring Wikileaks discussion."

Some WikiLeaks supporters accuse Twitter of preventing the term "WikiLeaks" from appearing as one of its popular "trending topics." Twitter denies censorship, saying the topics are determined by an algorithm.

Meanwhile, the French government's effort to stop a company from hosting WikiLeaks has failed - at least for now.

The Web services company OVH, which says a client hosts the wikileaks.ch website, sought a ruling by two courts about the legality of hosting WikiLeaks in France. The judges said they couldn't decide right away on the highly technical case.

WikiLeaks angered the U.S. government earlier this year when it posted a video showing U.S. troops gunning down two Reuters journalists. Since then, the organization has leaked some 400,000 classified U.S. war files from Iraq and 76,000 from Afghanistan that U.S. military officials say contained information that could put people's lives at risk.

The latest leaks involve private U.S. diplomatic cables that included frank U.S. assessments of foreign nations and their leaders. Those cables have embarrassing U.S. allies, angered rivals, and reopened old wounds across the world. U.S. State and Defense department officials say foreign powers have curtailed their dealings with the U.S. government since the documents hit the Internet.

U.S. officials have directed their ire at Assange but even some American allies have begun to ask whether Washington shares the blame.

"The core of all this lies with the failure of the government of the United States to properly protect its own diplomatic communications," Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd said Wednesday. "To have several million people on their distribution list for a quarter of a million cables - that's where the problem lies."

Assange, meanwhile, faces a new extradition hearing in London next week where his lawyers say they will reapply for bail. The 39-year-old Australian denies two women's allegations in Sweden of rape, molestation and unlawful coercion, and is fighting his extradition to Sweden.

In a Twitter message Wednesday, WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson shrugged off the challenges and noted that the site still releasing documents and is mirrored by supporters in over 500 locations.

"We will not be gagged, either by judicial action or corporate censorship ... WikiLeaks is still online," Hrafnsson said.

©2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Sean_W
Dec 08, 2010

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
Releasing info that gets innocent civilians targeted by terrorists is free speech but deciding not to support those acts is some sort of inexcusable censorship? Asshenge should be free to do what he wants but Master Card should obey the whims of computer vandals? Today's modern ethical code is awfully confusing. Should I throw acid on kids and bomb markets to be considered a respectable person or do I just need to show support for people who do?
ArcainOne
Dec 08, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
I have been to wikilinks maybe twice in my life so I am unfamiliar with the level of content that is there. I have heard many good stories be uncovered that have aided society in my opinion. So I always imagined or at least hoped that the content released there was useful information in the eyes of the public such as governments, corporations, and scientists behaving badly and doing wrong. Making them accountable. However it should also be noted when you have Governments and corperations angry at you, people with lots of money thus power, they will do everything they can to protect that.
Zed123
Dec 08, 2010

Rank: 4.8 / 5 (5)
Should I throw acid on kids and bomb markets to be considered a respectable person or do I just need to show support for people who do?


First step, stop smoking whatever it is you've been smoking. Its making you crazy.

Next step, explain how you got from Wikileaks releasing documents to throwing acid on kids and bombing stuff?

In my opinion, the issue here is the fact that he hasn't been charged with anything illegal yet. He has the right to free speech and can say whatever he likes. However he must accept that if, by doing so, he has breached privacy or broken a law there may be consequences imposed on him by the society he lives in.

The problem with what Mastercard and others are doing is they are imposing penalties on someone who has still not been convicted of any wrong doing. Innocent until proven guilty, isnt that how its supposed to work?
Bob_B
Dec 08, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
@ArcainOne: you are wrong. Just because a Right Wing Senator said it was wikiLINKS you thought she knew what she was talking about?

Then you even repeat what she said? After all the media joked about her being so wrong about wikiLINKS, hehe.
holoman
Dec 08, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
So Denial of Service to MasterCard and others is justified ?

Here's the deal, MasterCard, Visa or whomever has the right to deny or do business with anyone.

That's the law !

Caliban
Dec 08, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
So Denial of Service to MasterCard and others is justified ?

Here's the deal, MasterCard, Visa or whomever has the right to deny or do business with anyone.

That's the law !



So, denial of service to Wikileaks is justified?
And, does the State dept have the legal right to "encourage" businesses and foreign governments to deny service, shut down servers, and issue warrants?

Assange/Wikileaks have done nothing illegal under US Law, any more than the NYT, Der Spiegel, the Guardian, et al, and what we are witnessing now is the ABUSE OF POWER by the State, plain and simple.

It is mind-bending how easily some of you can cry out about injustice against someone's(that's right, corporations are persons, too!)rights, and immediately turn around and hypocritically shout for the blood of someone excercising the self-same right.

Enjoy your penispuppetry. We all know where used condoms end up.

Zed123
Dec 09, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
@ Caliban

LOL penispuppetry. Nice one. :) Although not sure I like the mental image I have now lol
DamienS
Dec 09, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
I realise it can be a double edged sword supporting vigilantes, but I'm wholly behind Operation Payback's targets, especially having previously worked on the Church of Scientology and the music industry machine!
LuckyBrandon
Dec 09, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
@Zed-what was released was confidential documents. this is something people can be SHOT for. you can go to jail for telling a cop to fk off, THAT is free speech (yet since you can go to jail, not to free huh).
these guys are really asking for countries to come down on them...theyll be shut down before too long...
Skeptic_Heretic
Dec 09, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I realise it can be a double edged sword supporting vigilantes, but I'm wholly behind Operation Payback's targets, especially having previously worked on the Church of Scientology and the music industry machine!

Knowledge is Free.
We are legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.
dtxx
Dec 09, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
So Denial of Service to MasterCard and others is justified ?

Here's the deal, MasterCard, Visa or whomever has the right to deny or do business with anyone.

That's the law !



It's not the law at all though. What if mastercard wanted to kick out all black owned businesses on the basis of race? Is that in the clear then?
ArcainOne
Dec 09, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
@ArcainOne: you are wrong. Just because a Right Wing Senator said it was wikiLINKS you thought she knew what she was talking about?

Then you even repeat what she said? After all the media joked about her being so wrong about wikiLINKS, hehe.


Actually bob I have no idea what you are talking about... I do not think you read my post completely
Rank 5 /5 (11 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Yahoo kills 'Livestand' just 6 months after debut

(AP) -- Yahoo is killing a tablet magazine called Livestand just six months its debut on the iPad.

Technology / Business

created 13 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1

Computers excel at identifying smiles of frustration (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US have trained computers to recognize smiles, and they have turned out to be more adept at recognizing smiles of frustration ...

Technology / Computer Sciences

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (2) | comments 1 | with audio podcast report

Yahoo! ditches digital newsstand for iPads

Yahoo! shuttered its fledgling digital newsstand for iPads on Friday in what it said was the start of a product purge intended to make the floundering Internet pioneer more nimble.

Technology / Internet

created 14 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Facebook IPO debacle raises investor dander

The spate of complaints and investigations over the Facebook stock offering suggests big institutions had an edge over small investors, raising questions about the process.

Technology / Business

created 15 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Apple CEO Cook gives up $75M in stock dividends

(AP) -- Apple CEO Tim Cook is giving up $75 million in dividends on restricted stock that the company is awarding to all of its employees.

Technology / Business

created 18 hours ago | popularity 1.8 / 5 (4) | comments 2


Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse

(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...

Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)

The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts

Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.

It's in the genes: Research pinpoints how plants know when to flower

Scientists believe they've pinpointed the last crucial piece of the 80-year-old puzzle of how plants "know" when to flower.

Researchers solve structure of human protein critical for silencing genes

In a study published in the journal Cell on May 24, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) scientists describe the three-dimensional atomic structure of a human protein bound to a piece of RNA that "guides" the pr ...