Greenland ice sheet flow driven by short-term weather extremes, not gradual warming: research
Sudden changes in the volume of meltwater contribute more to the acceleration and eventual loss of the Greenland ice sheet than the gradual increase of temperature, according to a University of British Columbia study.
The ice sheet consists of layers of compressed snow and covers roughly 80 per cent of the surface of Greenland. Since the 1990s, it has been documented to be losing approximately 100 billion tonnes of ice per year a process that most scientists agree is accelerating, but has been poorly understood. Some of the loss has been attributed to accelerated glacier flow towards ocean outlets.
Now a new study, to be published tomorrow in the journal Nature, shows that a steady meltwater supply from gradual warming may in fact slow down glacier flow, while sudden water input could cause glaciers to speed up and spread, resulting in increased melt.
"The conventional view has been that meltwater permeates the ice from the surface and pools under the base of the ice sheet," says Christian Schoof, an assistant professor at UBC's Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences and the study's author. "This water then serves as a lubricant between the glacier and the earth underneath it, allowing the glacier to shift to lower, warmer altitudes where more melt would occur."
Noting observations that during heavy rainfall, higher water pressure is required to force drainage along the base of the ice, Schoof created computer models that account for the complex fluid dynamics occurring at the interface of glacier and bedrock. He found that a steady supply of meltwater is well accommodated and drained through water channels that form under the glacier.
"Sudden water input caused by short term extremes such as massive rain storms or the draining of a surface lake however, cannot easily be accommodated by existing channels. This allows it to pool and lubricate the bottom of the glaciers and accelerate ice loss," says Schoof, who holds a Canada Research Chair in Global Process Modeling.
"This certainly doesn't mitigate the issue of global warming, but it does mean that we need to expand our understanding of what's behind the massive ice loss we're worried about," says Schoof.
A steady increase of temperature and short-term extreme weather conditions have both been attributed to global climate change. According to the European Environment Agency, ice loss from the Greenland ice sheet has contributed to global sea-level rise at 0.14 to 0.28 millimetres per year between 1993 and 2003.
"This study provides an elegant solution to one of the two key ice sheet instability problems identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in their 2007 assessment report," says Prof. Andrew Shepherd, an expert on using satellites to study physical processes of Earth's climate, based at the University of Leeds, the U.K.
"It turns out that, contrary to popular belief, Greenland ice sheet flow might not be accelerated by increased melting after all," says Shepherd, who was not involved in the research or peer review of the paper.
Provided by
University of British Columbia
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Scotland passes turbine test to harness tidal power,
40 comments
-
More human population = greater mass?
19 hours ago
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
-
determining time frame for most recent geological layers
May 17, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
20 hours ago |
5 / 5 (8) |
11
Dragon makes history with space station docking
The private company SpaceX made history Friday with the docking of its Dragon capsule to the International Space Station, the most impressive feat yet in turning routine spaceflight over to the commercial ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
13 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (6) |
0
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
21 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (10) |
26
SKA super telescope to be built in Australia, South Africa (Update 2)
A long-running joust to host a radio telescope that would give mankind its farthest peek into the Universe ended on Friday with a Solomon-like judgement to split the site between Australia and South Africa.
21 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
2
NASA sees Hurricane Bud threaten western Mexico's coast
NASA satellites are providing rainfall, temperature, pressure, visible and infrared data to forecasters as Hurricane Bud is expected to make a quick landfall in western Mexico this weekend before turning back ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
15 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts
Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.
It's in the genes: Research pinpoints how plants know when to flower
Scientists believe they've pinpointed the last crucial piece of the 80-year-old puzzle of how plants "know" when to flower.
Researchers solve structure of human protein critical for silencing genes
In a study published in the journal Cell on May 24, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) scientists describe the three-dimensional atomic structure of a human protein bound to a piece of RNA that "guides" the pr ...
MIT researchers devise new means to synchronize a group of robots (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- For several years, roboticists have been working out ways to get a group of robots to perform synchronized activities as demonstrated most often in dance routines. Its not just about trying ...
Dec 08, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Dec 08, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Dec 08, 2010
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (5)
Yep. For those who seize on evidence that supports their bias, and rejects all data that doesn't, anything about climate warming is bound to be inconvenient to someone.
Dec 08, 2010
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (6)
It is true that these scum will be the most difficult to deal with, but they can FORGET popular support. That has gone forever - here's to the wisdom of crowds!
Dec 08, 2010
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Maybe you can get back in the good graces of the grantors if you can find some historical records that prove it was called "Greenland" because it was discovered by Eric the Green. And prove that there wasn't a Medieval Warming Period where for several hundred years it was warmer than it is today, and people farmed and raised livestock there. And that there were no vineyards in England at the same time.
http://en.wikiped...m_Period
Oops, looks like you'll have to get William Connolley to edit that out of wikipedia like he did when he fudged those other 5,000 wiki-pages to make them all favorable to AGW.
Oh, wait...too late.
Looks like wikipedia has gone all denialist and banned him from ever editing on their site again because of his blatant bias in favor of AGW.
Dec 09, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
"It turns out that, contrary to popular belief, Greenland ice sheet flow might not be accelerated by increased melting after all,"
Let me explain that since those who have commented don't have the ability to parse the sentence.
First: They are talking about the flow of the ice, not the water. The reason that is important is that bulk ice flow moves ice toward locations where it will calve and melt in the ocean.
Second, they are talking about the ice flow "might not be accelerated by increased melting" which means that the two events are coupled but not mutually causal.
They are not commenting on the rate of melting (which is well documented to be increasing). They are stating that the increased melting will not accelerate the flow of ice to the ocean (by their models).
Continued
Dec 09, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Now let me point out one other interesting thing.
jscroft, cremmy, and geokstr are talking about this being the death knell for the AGCC group. It seems very interesting to me that these same folks have been quick to point out that the models are useless. So, now that their mis-reading of the article seems to bolster their view that the ice sheets are not melting as fast, they are ready to consider the models they denounce as gospel.
Let me summarize. This is one of many models. These modelers explains it is improving at every release. The people who say modeling is useless and wrong are jumping on this model as being gospel. And no matter what the accuracy of the model, those commenting on the perception that this indicates the ice sheets are not melting are just wrong.
Dec 09, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Wow. These numbers only come to ~0.5 to ~1 inch per century, not the 1 meter per century commonly reported by CNN and other media outlets.
What happened? Did the alarmists finally realize nobody is buying this BS anyway?
At a rate of 1 inch per century, we're in great shape, because a few decades from now we are all going to be on mostly solar and nuclear anyway. The majority of oil reserves will run out in a few decades anyway; long, long before any irreversible environmental damage would ever be done.
Dec 09, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 09, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
If this guy's research really did say anything negative about global warming do you think it would have been published on this site?